Select Committee on Environmental Audit Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Question 200-202)

MR PHIL WOOLAS MP, MS JAN THOMPSON, MR CHRIS DODWELL AND MR SCOTT WIGHTMAN

25 MARCH 2008

  Q200  Mr Stuart: Do you think a reformed CDM is the right instrument to deal with deforestation?

  Mr Woolas: Yes and no is the answer. The United States' position has been caricatured as one which says, "Why should we pay criminals not to do something that they shouldn't be doing anyway?" In other words, why should a market pay someone or a government pay someone not to do something illegal. The alternative point of view is to say that if you are to base carbon policies on science rather than on politics then carbon sinks are just as important and have to be taken into account in the same way as a power station does; and we are in the latter camp. On your baseline you have two considerations: you have the national baseline and the very sensitive issue of national sovereignty, particularly as expressed by Brazil, Indonesia and indeed other countries; then you have the point that was related to before about additionality. If we can show verifiable mechanisms of deforestation projects that take on board the sustainability then I think they will be part of the carbon market, but the jury is out on this issue.

  Q201  Mr Stuart: What about the EU ETS? Would it completely destabilise the ETS if reforestation or deforestation credits were allowed to enter in?

  Mr Woolas: At the moment, yes. Other things being equal, it would have such an impact that it would cut our nose to spite our face. Our policy is to work towards the inclusion of deforestation and aforestation of course within that market.

  Q202  Mr Stuart: Do you basically accept that eco-services, if you like, provided by forests being paid for is part of the long-term future?

  Mr Woolas: Yes, we do.

  Ms Thompson: If you were including it you would have to have deeper commitments and would have to do the balancing. The point I was going to make was, there is a mechanism for piloting approaches of how to tackle forestry issues. In Bali the UK Government announced a contribution of £15 million to the World Bank's forest carbon partnership facility which has a couple of funds in it—a readiness fund which looks at building capacity in developing countries so that they can measure these emissions properly and try and address issues of leakage and that sort of thing; and a carbon fund which looks at testing out incentive mechanisms and how payments are to be made and whether or not this comes through carbon markets, through public finance and to whom those payments would go and so on. Those pilots are getting underway now through this year and next so we can see where we get to by the time we are looking to conclude an international agreement.

  Mr Woolas: It is worth saying that Bali did include this. I thought personally that one of the greatest breakthroughs of Bali was that.

  Chairman: We have covered quite a lot of ground in the last two hours. We are grateful to both you and your officials for coming in both for the content and the manner in which you have dealt with our questions. We much appreciate that.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 8 July 2008