Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


Memorandum from the Institution of Mechanical Engineers

  The Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) is a professional body of over 78,000 professional engineers in the UK and overseas. The Institution's membership is involved in all aspects of energy exploration, conversion, supply, use and recovery. As a Learned Society, IMechE's role is to be a source of considered, balanced, impartial information and advice.

  IMechE welcomes the Environmental Audit Committee's inquiry into Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS). CCS has the potential to reduce the impact of energy generation. Given the very short timescale, the Institution's response will focus attention on general issues affecting new and existing coal plants in the UK (including Kingsnorth) and particularly the need for market, certainty regarding the implementation of CCS.

  The Institution believes that:

  1.  For a variety of reasons, including diversity, security of supply and grid balancing, coal-fired power generation should be allowed to continue to meet the UK's energy demand, at least in the short and medium terms. There is, therefore, a strong case to allow new coal-fired plants to be built.

  2.  Coal's high carbon content dictates that new and existing plants should only be allowed to continue to operate if their carbon emissions can be substantially reduced by roughly 85-90%. To achieve this, CCS and biomass co-firing are the two most viable options.

  3.  The Government needs to provide a strong incentive for coal plant operators to reduce their emissions, over and above the uncertainties of the EU ETS. We believe this is best provided by setting a date, after which all coal-fired plants would only be allowed to operate if the amount of CO2 emitted per MWh used (heat and/or electricity) are below a specific level.

  4.  Although the full CCS technology chain has not yet been demonstrated at commercial scale, all the individual elements of that chain have been realised; there is every reason to be optimistic that full-scale CCS is a practical prospect.

  5.  CCS is applicable to natural gas-fired generation as well as coal. A similar emissions limit and cut-off date should apply to gas to ensure a fair and level playing field for both energy sources.

  6.  Our preliminary assessment is that a suitable cut-off date would probably be 1 June 2018.

  7.  Efficient modern coal-fired plants, operating in power-supply mode only and without CCS, have emissions factors of about 700gCO2/MWh. Our preliminary assessment, therefore, of a suitable post-2018 emissions factor for coal would be 100kgCO2/MWh.

  8.  Making use of a significant proportion of the heat currently wasted, by operating in Combined Heat and Power (CHP) mode, through links to suitable domestic, commercial and/or industrial heat users, would also greatly reduce the plant's emissions per unit of energy delivered. Alongside CCS and biomass co-firing, such schemes should be strongly encouraged and incentivised.

  9.  Such a technology blind approach gives operators freedom to find the most cost effective ways to meet this requirement, be it by pre or post-combustion CCS, CHP, biomass co-firing or any combination of these measures; and

  10.  The Government must recognise and support the tremendous potential for UK engineering, applied via CCS and other projects, to set a world lead in this vital emerging technology area, and the consequent job creation, export earnings and global emissions reduction opportunities.

2 June 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 22 July 2008