Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


Annex 3

1.  What are the possible positive and negative social, environmental and economic consequences of biofuels? How might trade-offs between climate benefits and environmental and social impacts be made? Is there a need to develop a new biofuel strategy for the UK or EU, to balance the environmental, social, economic and climate impacts of biofuels?

Introduction

  There are a number of issues around the question posed by this inquiry which the social sciences are uniquely placed to address, and the call for submissions to the inquiry explicitly recognises this urgent need to explore the wider social and economic impacts of biofuels. Particular social science interests in this area are around issues such as land use and planning, in particular rural land use and the potential impact on rural economies; the potential role of biofuels in energy security; the effect of biofuels on developing economies, in particular the issue of food security; and a wider interest in public engagement with the energy and climate change agenda, and the role of biofuels within this.

ESRC supported bioenergy research

  The ESRC's portfolio in this area is limited. However, the social and economic aspects of biomass are addressed to some extent through wider initiatives funded through other Research Councils such as the bioenergy SUPERGEN consortium (covered in more detail in the memorandum from EPSRC) and the TSEC Biosys and Bioenergy initiative, which aims to take a whole-systems approach to issues such as the role of biofuels in energy security, and a range of economic issues arising from biofuels.

  Much of the ESRC interest in biofuels is focussed around issues of the rural economy and land-use planning, with some major work being undertaken as part of the cross-Council Rural Economy and Land Use Programme. Work under this programme is addressing the potential local impacts of the growth of energy crops, in particular public opinion on the potential changes to agricultural landscapes as a result of large scale growth of energy crops. The importance of strategic rural planning is a vital issue here, with the need for a clear vision and public consensus on land use identified as priorities, with land used for energy crops likely to significantly reduce land available for food crops, which may in turn have an impact on food pricing, as has been seen in countries such as Mexico, which has a significant percentage of land devoted to energy crops. The impact of such a strategy would impact most heavily on developing countries, although developed countries would also feel the impact of any major change in land use in this way.

  ESRC research under the Sustainable Technologies programme has also addressed issues relating to biofuels, with biomass boilers identified as one particularly suitable form of microgeneration for implementation in rural communities, which are often less well integrated into energy infrastructures, and can help local farmers through diversification into a new income source. However, the support available for community initiatives such as this has been rather chaotic to date, and the funding available to support community initiatives remains small and short term.









 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 21 January 2008