Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Scotch Whiskey Association

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) is the trade body which represents the interests of the Scotch Whisky industry at home and abroad. Its main objective is to protect and promote Scotch Whisky.

  1.2  Scotch Whisky is important to the economy of Scotland and the UK as a whole. With exports contributing £2.5 billion a year to the balance of trade, Scotch Whisky represents almost a quarter of all UK food and drink exports and supports 65,000 jobs. It competes in the world market with other distilled spirit drinks, such as Cognac.

  1.3    The SWA is following closely the development of the global and domestic biofuels industry. It has significant implications for the UK potable alcohol distilling sector, not least in relation to procurement, price and competition issues. It will be important to take a holistic view of the implications of the development of the biofuels sector and to ensure that there is a level playing field for all distillers, whether of potable alcohol or for fuel.

  1.4  The SWA welcomes the Committee's timely inquiry and the opportunity to provide evidence on the sustainability of the biofuels industry.

2.  IMPLICATIONS FOR RAW MATERIAL SUPPLY CHAIN

  2.1  Scotch Whisky is a strictly defined product, with a production process protected in UK law, under The Scotch Whisky Act 1988 and the Order made under it (which came into effect in June 1990). Scotch Whisky must be distilled and matured in Scotland. The raw materials used in Scotch Whisky production are cereals, water and yeast.

  2.2  The industry relies on a sustainable cereals supply chain, using good quality, largely Scottish-sourced grain as its major raw material. In 2005, for example, the industry used some 442,000 tonnes of barley and around 545,000 tonnes of other grains (largely wheat and maize) in Scotch Whisky production.

  2.3  As the committee is aware, the Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO) will obligate fuel companies in the UK to replace 5% of their total transport fuel with biofuels by 2010-11. The Government's biomass strategy estimates that to achieve this target, even assuming a 50% import of biofuel, around 1.68m tonnes of wheat would be required in the UK for bioethanol production.

  2.4  The Scotch Whisky industry is experiencing growing international demand, with global exports in 2006 rising by 4% in value and 6% in volume compared to 2005. New investment in distilling, warehousing and bottling capacity is being made across Scotland to meet that demand. Supported by growth in traditionally important markets, such as the USA, but also in significant emerging markets in Asia and South America, it is anticipated that Scotch Whisky production will continue to increase in the coming years, with a greater demand for barley and wheat as its essential raw materials.

  2.5  It is therefore clear that bioethanol plants working on an industrial scale, and using grain (principally wheat) as their raw material, will have an impact on cereals supply in the UK. This is particularly important at a time of growth for the Scotch Whisky industry and when such plants are likely to have capacities, and a demand for grain, in excess of the Scotch Whisky industry's total grain whisky production capacity.

  2.6  As a result, the SWA is carefully monitoring the potential implications of the biofuels sector for the availability of basic raw materials for Scotch Whisky production. Should the bioethanol industry, for example, continue to grow as is widely expected, a direct consequence is likely to be a tightening in cereal supply and an increase in cereal prices (at a time when world cereals prices have already increased significantly. Wheat and malting barley prices, for example, have more than doubled in the past 12 months).

  2.7  The Scotch Whisky industry supports specific grain varieties (through the Home Grown Cereals Authority (HGCA)) which provide efficient alcohol yields and other beneficial factors. Whilst we would envisage the bioethanol industry requiring grain with similar distilling properties, there is a risk of diversion by farmers to growing different varieties of grain which are not tailored for the potable alcohol market, with a consequent reduction in the acreage of wheat and barley for the potable alcohol distillers. Should the agricultural sector respond to a demand for different cereal varieties, availability of distilling quality grain could be impacted, with a potential detrimental affect on production efficiencies.

  2.8  The industry is also mindful that the anticipated size of biofuel plants in the UK may encourage cereal growers to focus on growing crops attractive to that industry, such as oilseed rape, rather than barley and wheat. Such a trend would reduce grain availability and again increase demand and price for traditional distilling cereals.

  2.9  The recent decision by the European Commission to suspend for one year the CAP set-aside provisions is welcome, but it is unlikely by itself to have much effect on the cereal market and prices, as the land currently set aside is not likely to be used for planting cereal crops.

  2.10  The SWA believes it is important the Government ensures that any assistance provided to the biofuels industry, in particular the production of bio-ethanol, does not have any unintended consequences for the competitiveness of existing industries, such as the UK spirits sector.

3.  IMPLICATIONS FOR CO-PRODUCTS MARKET

  3.1  The production of ethanol from grain produces a nutrient-rich co-product used widely as feed, for example for the Scottish meat and dairy herd. This is an important local, sustainable market for distillers.

  3.2  Bioethanol production from grain will also create a significant volume of co-product, which will impact on the distilling industry's established outlets. This would have implications from an economic point of view (reducing income from animal feeds) and on the re-use of residues from the production process (a lower number of available outlets).

  3.3  The distilling industry is exploring opportunities to utilise co-products as an alternative fuel, as well as continuing its current policy of sustainable recycling to animal feeds. We would wish Government to be supportive of these efforts, outside of biofuels, to assist moves towards a low-carbon economy.

4.  COMPETITION IMPLICATIONS

  4.1  A wide range of incentives are being offered to biofuels producers in the UK to stimulate growth in the industry. In contrast, there are no such incentives available in the potable alcohol distilling sector and new entrants face significant capital barriers to the market.

  4.2  It is important that Government ensures that the range and scale of incentives, including subsidies, being offered, for example to locate in the UK, does not create an uneven playing field for spirits manufacturers that are in direct competition for raw material and outlets for co-products.

  4.3  The UK Government has expressed, in its biomass strategy, a desire to ensure that its own strategies towards biofuels will not lead to an uneven playing field. That is of course welcome but we remain to be convinced that the framework for biofuels development in the UK contains adequate checks and balances to ensure unintended consequences for other industries.

  4.4  The SWA would encourage the Government to be specific about how they intend to ensure a level playing field and what account has been taken of the potential disbenefits to indigenous distillers of the subsidies available to biofuels distillers.

5.  REGULATORY CONTROL FRAMEWORK

  5.1  It is technically feasible that a biofuels producer might seek to distil alcohol of potable quality.

  5.2  Whilst we understand that the tax revenue from both potable and fuel alcohols are, and will be strictly controlled by, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), there remains concern that the reduced rate of taxation for biofuels could, theoretically, make it attractive to the counterfeit industry to use alcohol intended for fuel purposes in what might purport to be potable products, without any of the usual stringent food safety checks in place.

  5.3  It is imperative for public health and excise protection reasons that robust strategies and policing are put in place to stop the diversion of non-potable alcohol into the potable alcohol market.

  5.4  The legitimate potable alcohol trade and its trade associations continues to work closely with HM Revenue & Customs, with the spirits industry's commitment clearly demonstrated by our "Memorandum of Understanding" with HMRC to tackle spirits fraud. Launched in October 2005, this agreement sets out a framework to formalise the long-standing co-operation between the industry and HMRC. This enables HMRC to target resources on the areas of highest risk and the industry would not wish to see any developments in the biofuels industry undermine the success such co-operation has achieved.

  5.5  We would therefore encourage HM Revenue & Customs to adopt a similar approach with the biofuels industry and ensure that all parts of the alcohol supply chain (potable and otherwise) are subject to similar levels of scrutiny.

6.  CONCLUSION

  6.1  The emergence of the biofuels industry will have significant implications for a wide range of sectors, including the UK distilled spirits industry. In supporting the development of biofuels, care must be taken not to undermine the competitiveness of existing industries and to ensure a level playing field for distillers of potable and non-potable alcohol to the benefit of the wider economy.

2 October 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 21 January 2008