Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Centrica (EEFP 21)

  Centrica welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the scope of the EFRA Select Committee's forthcoming inquiry into energy efficiency and fuel poverty.

  During the course of its inquiry, we believe it would be useful for the Committee to consider (amongst others) the following areas:

CERT (CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION TARGET)

    —  The level of support given for microgeneration and other emerging technologies, currently a split activity with BERR.

    —  The level of support offered by Government to energy suppliers in the delivery of challenging CERT targets, particularly around possible forms of data-sharing.

    —  The level of administrative burden faced by energy suppliers in the delivery of CERT targets.

    —  We believe the scope to incentivise energy efficiency innovation through CERT and other mechanisms are often overlooked, particularly at a research and development level.

    —  Consideration should also be given to any Suppliers Obligation post-2012 and what energy efficiency measures this framework will involve, possibly reflecting on the success of the Energy Efficiency Commitment.

ENERGY EFFICIENCY—OVER-LOOKED SECTORS

    —  Consideration should be given to steps which can be taken to drive and incentivise energy efficiency in other sectors, including SME business sector, the private rental household sectors, participation by the non-household sector.

FUEL POVERTY

    —  Recognition that fuel poverty is caused by complex interaction of quality of housing stock, household income and energy prices—not just energy prices.

    —  Equal consideration should be given to these other areas during the course of the inquiry.

    —  Energy suppliers recognise the important role they have to play in tackling fuel poverty, however consideration should also be given to the role of government in tackling fuel poverty.

DATA SHARING

    —  The issue of identifying those eligible for both fuel poverty and energy efficiency supplier led schemes remains a huge challenge for energy suppliers in terms of both financial costs and manpower.

    —  We would welcome consideration into possible forms that data-sharing with relevant Government Departments (particularly DWP) could take.

TAKE UP AND TARGETING OF GOVERNMENT BENEFITS

    —  Research shows that a large amount of Government benefits go unclaimed, which would offer the potential to make a real, sustainable difference to household income.

    —  Consideration should be given to steps which could be taken both to improve the take up of Government benefits and also to increase awareness of the help and advice that is available on accessing Government entitlements.

WINTER FUEL PAYMENT

    —  The Winter Fuel Payment is often not used to pay energy bills. We believe that Winter Fuel Payment should be paid directly to suppliers so that we can offset this against their energy bills.

    —  In addition the Winter Fuel Payment is paid to all those aged over 60, irrespective of income. Consideration of whether the Winter Fuel Payment should be better targeted and extended to other vulnerable groups would be helpful.

SMART METERS

    —  Consideration should be given to the role and scope of smart meters in tackling fuel poverty and encouraging households to become more energy efficient.

    —  Smart meters offer potential to lowering household carbon emissions through more accurate readings and lower energy usage. In addition they could be an important tool in combating fuel poverty by potentially eliminating the adverse cost differential between credit and prepayment meters.

April 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 6 November 2008