Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Thrupp Parish Council Canal Working Group

  We deplore BW's withdrawal from the project, with the consequent removal of public money—we do not believe public bodies should be allowed to act in this fashion.

  The Thrupp and Brimscombe Community has supported the restoration of the canal from the start and our enthusiasm played a major part in winning HLF funding. However we have found BW a difficult partner to work with throughout. There has always been mixed priorities of restoring the canal and Brimscombe Port in a way that meets community and environmental needs and the property development aims of BW. It seems inappropriate that a public body should have these mixed objectives and also be so unaccountable to local communities.

  The key points I would like to make are:

    1.  The restoration of the Cotswold Canal and Brimscombe Port are worthwhile and need Government support;

    2.  The restoration needs to meet community and environmental needs, which must not be made subservient to property development profits;

    3.  The project needs to be brought under democratic control with formal involvement of community representatives in decision making.

Cllr Martin Whiteside

District Councillor and chair of Thrupp Parish Council Canal Working Group

February 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 1 July 2008