Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Ken Bailey

BRITISH WATERWAYS—COTSWOLD CANALS PROJECT

  1.  Now 2 Years into a three year project :

    a.  Only one planning application for works submitted in that time, Six months after project HLF approval.

    b.  Only one project has been started, Eighteen months after project approval.

  2.  Virtually no additional funding sources has been identified by BW from the start of this project.

  3.  Delays in the project have resulted in a large amount of money being lost due to inflation over the period. A lot of straight forward dredging and lock chamber repair work could have been carried out and paid for with limited input from British Waterways project staff.

  4.  Considerable time and effort has been spent on re-costing the project with increases each time.

  5.  British Waterways have generally refused to put work out to tender, insisting on using their preferred contractors.

  6.  Lack of senior Engineering Project manager until January 2008.

  7.  High staff turn-over in all areas and low morale within British Waterways project team.

  8.  Lack of high level (director) push behind such a major project.

  9.  Reluctance to use the knowledge or information available from long standing Cotswold Canals Trust members.

  10.  Reluctance to allow significant volunteer involvement on the ground until recent months.

  11.  Very little progress with land owner negotiations for other than those with Company of Proprietors of Stroud water Navigation and also Glos County Council.

  12.  Response to Maintenance problems has been some what lacking, such as a failed sluice gate which took several weeks to repair resulting in the death of a considerable number of fish. Volunteer offers to make either temporary and permanent repairs were declined.

  13.  When BW announced that they would be withdrawing from the project they apparently asked DEFRA "for a one week period to notify staff and other project partners" as reported in Hansard in response to a question asked by David Drew MP.

    a.  Stroud District Council were informed some 30 mins before press.

    b.  Cotswold Canals Trust 10 mins before the press.

    c.  Company of Proprietors of Stroud water Navigation have yet to be notified formally . . ..

  14.  A considerable number of projects, both private and publicly funded", have been build round the "restored canal" which may fail if the project stalls.

  15.  BW withdrawing may will not only result in the loss of their own fairly small outstanding financial contribution. but may also mean that HLF funding will not be available to others to continue the work.

Ken Bailey

March 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 1 July 2008