Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by The Kennet & Avon Canal Trust

1.  SUMMARY

  We understand that The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee will hold a one-off evidence session on British Waterways (BW), to follow up its work in this area last year (Seventh Report of Session 2006-07, HC 345-I). The Committee will take oral evidence from both Defra and British Waterways to examine BW's regeneration and restoration role, with particular reference to BW's decision to withdraw from the Cotswold Canal Partnership.

  The Kennet and Avon Canal Trust considers that the Government has not taken due account of the environmental, social and economic benefits that would accrue to the communities through which the Canal passes as a result of the successful completion of the project. These benefits are now in doubt because of the withdrawal of British Waterways as the lead partner.

  We would ask that the Department reconsiders its decision.

2.  THE KENNET AND AVON CANAL

  By way of example to the Department when considering its decision in the light of our submission and others, we draw on the parallels offered by the Kennet and Avon Canal Trust and its partners including British Waterways, in demonstrating the achievements obtained by pursuing a similar project as the Cotswold Canal to completion. All parties to the K&A partnership, have successfully restored and returned the canal to the nation in attractive condition and working order, as a vital resource for employment, leisure and Tourism. The Kennet and Avon Canal which runs for 87 miles and connects the River Avon at Bristol with the River Thames at Reading was in its heyday and is once more, a waterway of strategic importance connecting London with Bristol and forming part of a group of canals in the South West which are a focus for restoration (the Wiltshire and Berkshire, the Cotswolds, the Herefordshire and Gloucestershire, the Exeter, the Bude, the River Tone and the River Parrett).

  The culmination of the successful restoration of the K&A was its official re-opening to through navigation in 1990 by HM The Queen. However, the waterway still suffered from significant and long-standing structural problems of water leakage and embankment stability which, unless they were addressed, would have threatened future usage of the canal.

  A second major phase of restoration was subsequently undertaken, following a successful £25 million bid made in 1996 to the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) for funding to complete the restoration of the canal. Matched funding, totalling an additional £4.24 million, was provided by British Waterways, the Kennet and Avon Canal Trust and riparian local authorities. Work began in 1997 and involved:

    —  Ensuring an adequate water supply to sections of the canal though Devizes, including the Caen Hill Lock Flight

    —  Stabilising the embankment within the Bath Valley

    —  Improved access and interpretation plus nature conservation, heritage and landscaping projects throughout the length of the waterway

  Work was completed in December 2002 and the works completion was celebrated by the visit of HRH the Prince of Wales in May 2003.

3.  EVIDENCE OF THE BENEFITS OF A SUCCESSFUL RESTORATION

  A successful restoration brings many tangible benefits many are achieved during the life time of the restoration as well as afterwards. The Kennet and Avon Canal Trust and its partners led the way in canal restoration and the understanding of its benefits. After the successful completion of the Heritage Lottery Fund Project, in the process, gaining a sustainable future for the waterway, research has found that there are significant National, Regional and Local benefits.

  The following is just an extract of the recent research—Ecotec 2006

  The economic impacts associated with the Kennet and Avon Canal are substantial, and have grown significantly since 2002:

    —  Tourism and leisure activity along the canal corridor supports a diverse array of tourism and leisure businesses and connected employment in the areas through which the canal passes. Almost half of all tourism and leisure businesses within the canal corridor say that the canal is important to their business. On average, around 10-20% of the turnover of tourism and leisure businesses within the canal corridor is likely to be attributable to expenditure by canal users. This expenditure directly supports between 770 and 930 full-time jobs in the tourism and leisure economy within the canal corridor.

    —  Visitor numbers to the Kennet and Avon Canal have increased between 2002-2005. Evidence suggests in particular that the number of informal visitors to the canal towpath has increased at a greater rate than countryside visits nationally. Tourism and leisure businesses report that informal visitors to the canal have become increasingly important to their businesses since 2002.

    —  In the future, the upward trends in visitor numbers and consequent expenditure are likely to continue. A number of marina developments are in the pipeline, and should they go ahead, these developments will relieve pressure on the substantial waiting lists for moorings that currently exist. Over one third of businesses say that the canal restoration has benefited their business, while 18% believe that the canal will become more important to them in the future.

    —  The Kennet and Avon Canal continues to act as a significant attraction to property developers, despite the planning restrictions that exist along substantial stretches of the canal's route. In the future, the canal will form the centrepiece of the redevelopment of Newbury town centre.

  The Kennet and Avon Canal continues to deliver significant economic benefits to the local economies through which it passes. These economic benefits have increased since 2002, and, based on current trends, are likely to continue to increase in the future.

4.  THE COTSWOLDS CANALS PROJECT

  Direct parallels can be drawn from The Kennet and Avon Canal's regeneration. A similar model is being used for the regeneration of the Cotswold Canal and similar benefits are expected by that Partnership within the communities the canal passes through.

  We submit that no other form of investment of a similar sum of money as is involved in the funding cut currently inflicted, will provide such a plural and inclusive form of long lasting benefit on the scale the Cotswold Canal Partnership are working towards either in its adopted timescale or in any other, shorter or longer.

  It should also not be forgotten that the economic model used in the restoration work on this particular Canal, relies on the funding of British Waterways and money donated via the Cotswold Canal Trust and other community channels to act as a primer. These funds liberate a far greater resource in labour and volunteer effort applied in the restoration of the Canal. That effort in turn acts as a catalyst in the economic growth of the Canal corridor. If DEFRA had to go out and procure the same effort it would have to pay several times more than the current value of the cut for the same work. In short DEFRA could not obtain the same social and economic value for its investment as it does through British Waterway's participation in the Cotswold Partnership.

  The Kennet and Avon Canal Trust and its partners therefore object strongly to the decision that British Waterways withdraws from the Cotswolds Canals Partnership.

  It would be short sighted and put in jeopardy the long term economic and social prospects of the communities through which the Cotswold Canal passes. We appeal to DEFRA to consider the investment cut not only in strict monetary terms but in terms of how much additional resource and effort that the cut in funds actually represents and which will now go to waste leaving a committed community without a major focus and a loss of purpose whose value is far greater to the region than the face value of the monetary cut.

  Alongside the potentially crippling loss in momentum within the project built up over many years of dedicated focus which the cuts will bring at a stroke, employment will be lost, volunteer workforces will dissipate to the loss of the community, valuable leisure amenities will not now be created. Employment prospects will directly diminish in the region as a result.

  We feel that ways should be found to allow dedicated finance to be allocated to British Waterways which will allow them to continue their participation in the group and to continue to deliver the many benefits which the community has already benefited from as a result of this project progressing and those which await a rural community on completion of such a project, in line with those that we along the Kennet and Avon Canal have achieved.

The Kennet & Avon Canal Trust

March 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 1 July 2008