Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Wychavon District Council

SUMMARY

  1.  The Droitwich Canals Restoration project is soon to become a reality with major construction works starting in the summer. This is primarily due to the strong working partnership between British Waterways (BW) and Wychavon District Council staff with strong and effective support of Worcestershire County Council and Droitwich Canals Trust. Wychavon has found BW to be an innovative and accommodating partner with the project having benefited greatly from the regeneration and restoration skills within the organisation.

  2.  Wychavon District Council is concerned that the reduction in funding available to British Waterways has significantly contributed to the decision to withdraw from the Cotswold Canal restoration.

  3.  Although we have received assurances that the Droitwich Canal Restoration project is not affected it is a concern that organisational changes resulting from that decision both in respect of the staff involved in the project and wider budget pressures within the organisation could impact on the delivery and sustainability of the restoration.

  4.  The Council is mindful of the reliance that large scale regeneration schemes place on external funding and that the decision taken by BW to withdraw from the Cotswold Restoration scheme may impact on future projects involving BW if potential funders view BW as a "risky" partner. We do hope however that such a scenario would not arise.

PROJECT BACKGROUND

  5.  Wychavon District Council has been working closely with British Waterways, since 2000 to restore the Droitwich Canals in Worcestershire, to full navigation and to create a linear park along the canal corridor which will protect and enhance the environment and provide a recreational resource for residents and visitors.

  6.  The reopening of the Droitwich Canals will create a unique 21 mile cruising ring using the River Severn and the Worcester & Birmingham Canal and will act as a stimulus to the local economy by encouraging new tourism based businesses and the redevelopment of canal side land and properties.

  7.  Working in partnership with British Waterways we have secured over £8 million pounds of external funding from organisations including Advantage West Midlands and the Heritage Lottery Fund. Wychavon and Worcestershire County Council have each provided £1 million of funding towards the project.

  8.  Planning approval for the project was received in January 2008 and we expect to start the first major works package in the early summer. Completion of the project is due by spring 2010.

BRITISH WATERWAYS

  9.  Over the last 8 years we have developed and maintained excellent working relationships with British Waterways and have found BW to be an innovative and accommodating partner. In particular the Droitwich Canals project team and its Project Manager, has in conjunction with the Wychavon team "made this project happen". The Council is conscious that without the dedication of the staff involved and their willingness to engage with stakeholders and funding bodies at all levels we would not be in the fortunate position we are in at this time. BW has brought considerable expertise into the project in relation to the engineering solutions needed to reopen the canals to navigation and in respect of the redevelopment opportunities along the canal.

  10.  Wychavon cannot comment and it would not be appropriate for us to do so, on the reasons for British Waterways decision to withdraw from the Cotswold Canal Restoration other than to restate the information is already within the public domain. We are aware of the financial pressures on BW which have increased over the last 12 months which from our perspective has appeared to have reduced their ability to accept project risks whilst maintaining the national canal network.

  11.  Without having access to all relevant information we are unable to express an opinion on the merit of the decision by British Waterways to withdraw from the Cotswold scheme but we would not expect them to have done so unless it was absolutely necessary and after proper consideration of the impacts. We acknowledge that as a public body difficult decisions do need to be taken and we are aware from having worked closely with the BW team that there were a number of issues that have substantially increased the project cost and consequent risk to BW. Whether these justified the decision is not a matter we can comment on.

  12.  Wychavon has been reassured of British Waterways commitment to the Droitwich project, for which we are grateful. We consider the continuing support of BW to be essential to the success of the restoration and would have serious concerns about the viability of the scheme without British Waterways resources, knowledge and its willingness to accept responsibility for the future ownership and management of the waterway.

  13.  The decision to withdraw from the Cotswold scheme could have an impact on the Droitwich project as many of the staff were shared between the projects. Internal changes within BW following the withdrawal from the scheme have yet to be clarified but we would be deeply concerned if they resulted in the loss of key staff and knowledge which are considered essential to the Droitwich scheme. The Council has sought appropriate assurances on this matter and expects to receive them shortly.

  14.  Our close working relationship with British Waterways from the earliest stages of the project has meant that the risks associated with the scheme are known to each of us as well as the main funding bodies. In the event of the project risk and cost increasing we would expect BW to meet its commitment to complete the project, as both Wychavon and BW have resolved at Board level to commit to the Droitwich Canals restoration.

  15.  The Council is aware that internal budgetary constraints within British Waterways have limited the operations of the individual waterway regions. We understand that this has occurred as a consequence of the reduction in grant funding from the sponsoring department.

  16.  There has been a clear impact upon the Droitwich restoration project as a consequence of the cut in funding including a forced reduction in staff within the West Midlands Waterways Unit which is no longer able to support the restoration project to the same extent as it did to prior to the imposition of budget cuts.

  17.  We are mindful that the Cotswold Canal Restoration scheme was substantially funded by both the Heritage Lottery Fund and the South West Regional Development Agency. Will these agencies and indeed other potential funders may now be less inclined to become involved in schemes where BW is a key partner? Without successful multi-agency partnerships its is difficult to foresee how future canal restoration projects could be brought to fruition.

  18.  We would ask that the Committee reviews the decision to withdraw from the Cotswold canal scheme within the wider context of British Waterways regeneration successes. The gravity of the decision must, however, be acknowledged and impact of the reduced funding available to BW in future financial years needs to be ascertained otherwise there is a risk that other projects will be curtailed despite BW's assurances to the contrary.

  19.  Funding pressures within BW in the future may also result in further reductions in maintenance expenditure which is of concern to the Council as we have agreed with BW that the restored canals will be transferred into their ownership upon completion. This mechanism has been adopted as it would ensure the canals are maintained by the appropriate authority as cruising waterways are part of the national canal network. Following the expenditure of considerable public funds to restore the canals to navigation it would be unconscionable to see that gain negated by inadequate long-term maintenance.

Jack Hegarty, Managing Director

Wychavon District Council

March 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 1 July 2008