Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by The Droitwich Canal Trust

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    —  The Droitwich Canal Trust (DCT) is in a good position to comment on its close Partnership with British Waterways (BW) in restoring the Droitwich Canals.

    —  The support of BW has enabled a full Partnership to be formed and to progress the funding necessary to complete this project.

    —  BW support has resulted in considerable added value to for the Droitwich Partnership.

    —  The ongoing involvement of BW has ensured a high quality restoration and has substantiated an exit strategy.

    —  The actual value of the BW support far outweighs the cost to BW.

    —  DCT greatly sympathises with the Cotswolds Canals Trust and other restoration organisations following this decision.

    —  DCT suggests that this announcement has given the wrong message to any bodies who may be inclined to support waterways restoration.

    —  DCT believes that the real solution is for sufficient long term funding to support both retention of the existing waterways system and its extension through restoration.

  1.  This submission is made on behalf of the Droitwich Canals Trust Ltd (DCT) and has been approved by its Council of Management. DCT has been both campaigning for and actively progressing restoration of the Droitwich Barge and Junction Canals since 1973. The restoration is now entering its final stage and we are confident that completion will take place by the end of 2009. During the past eight years, DCT has worked closely in partnership with a British Waterways (BW) project team and our experiences during this period may be of interest to the Select Committee in its deliberations.

  2.  As with many canal restoration trusts, DCT progressed the restoration for the first 25 years largely without support or major grant funding. Although considerable progress was made, it became clear to the directors that full restoration would only be achieved in a reasonable timescale through a partnership. With this in mind the support of BW was sought and given by its then Chief Executive and this was soon followed by a similar commitment from the Waterways Trust. Although these commitments came without any guarantee of specific funding, they acted as a catalyst to move the project forward.

  3.  This resulted in the formation of a Partnership of the above organisations with the District and County Councils who committed £1 million each as contributions towards the full funding package. This enabled applications to the Heritage Lottery Fund and Advantage West Midlands (the Regional Development Fund) to be made successfully and with other grants, to achieve £10.5 million of the required £11.5 million. Since then, we have reduced the funding gap considerably through other applications and private donations to the point where contracts can be let for the full works.

  4.  Throughout this period, DCT and other members of the Partnership have worked closely with a BW project team which has gradually developed bringing in all necessary disciplines as required. Although all funding has been obtained by the partnership, we are well aware of the added value that the BW resourcing has given to the project. Without it, it is extremely unlikely that the grant applications would have been accepted. The directors of DCT and our employees have benefited considerably from having the range of expertise that BW has brought to the project, from other completed restorations and from operating over 2,000 miles of navigable waterways with all its inherent problems.

  5.  As we progress towards completion, we believe that it is vital to have the input of BW in developing an exit strategy. Without this in place, it is unlikely that most of the funding would have been granted and the Local Authorities are understandably reluctant to take on any long term commitments. The ongoing support of BW as the project develops will ensure that the canals will be restored to a sufficient standard to minimise long term maintenance costs. Indeed, without this it is extremely unlikely that BW would be prepared to take them over on completion, given their current financial restrictions.

  6.  DCT is of the opinion that the actual value that the BW project team has put into the project far outweighs the cost to BW. It has been essential in convincing the local authorities and others that the restoration is viable and in obtaining the grant funding. Without it, DCT would probably have been forced into continuing the work itself in a climate of increasing costs and complex legislation which is mitigating against volunteer effort alone.

  7.  We have every sympathy with the Costwolds Canals Trust as their project has been managed very much in parallel with ours sharing much of the BW resources. This has enabled them to obtain considerable funding well in excess of the actual cost to BW. This withdrawal of support, without prior consultation with its partners, at such a critical stage in the restoration, will undoubtedly caste doubts regarding the total funding and the time scale to completion.

  8.  We wish to emphasise the benefits of support from British Waterways in the more general context of waterways regeneration and restoration. Many such projects are at an early stage, kept alive by the enthusiasm and dedication of volunteer. They can only progress, however slowly, by obtaining small grants to cover their ongoing work and one off expenditure such as commissioning feasibility studies. Where ever they seek funding, from Local Authorities, other Trusts or from private donations, some assurance on the viability of the scheme is essential.

  9.  We suggest that the withdrawal of BW from the Cotswolds Partnership gives the wrong message to all potential funders. Restoration Trusts have been very successful in obtaining funding many times in excess of the financial support from BW and this has now been made more difficult.

  10.  We are fully aware of the current difficulties facing BW following the severe cuts in its grant aid and we understand that difficult decisions must be made. We regret that this has resulted in BW withdrawing from the Cotswolds Restoration. We submit that the real answer is for Government to provide sufficient long term funding to enable both the retention of the existing waterways network to the highest heritage standard and its gradual extension through the completion of restoration projects.

The Droitwich Canals Trust

March 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 1 July 2008