Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the British Association for Shooting and Conservation (DMB 45)

  The British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC) would like the following points to be considered by the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee.

  1.  BASC's view is that sufficient public access exists on the English coastline. BASC questions why so much money, time and effort is being spent on legislative proposals for the creation and extension of access, when existing access is poorly used and many access routes are in disrepair.

  2.  There are many instances where landowners and occupiers have entered into voluntary or permissive new access agreements, through the Countryside Stewardship Scheme and the Higher Level Stewardship Scheme (HLS). New access under such schemes is provided where there is a demonstrable need, and require that the route does not impact on conservation objectives. Providing new coastal access through targeted HLS agreements would ensure new access routes were needed, cost-effective and well managed.

  3.  If coastal access is legislated for through the Marine Bill, despite the lack of a demonstrable need and despite the high cost to the taxpayer, then BASC has outlined the accompanying points 4-14 in its views of the existing proposals.

  4.  BASC welcomes the publication of Natural England's outline scheme for coastal access, to accompany the coastal access provisions in the draft Marine Bill. The outline scheme provides the key principles under which alignment of a coastal trail would be based.

  5.  BASC welcomes a consultative approach at a local level, with the first stage in that approach involving landowners and occupiers, inclusive of those with shooting interests on that land.

  6.  BASC welcomes the fact that the scheme will not include provisions relating to "higher rights" on the coast such as horse-riding or cycling, and seeks assurances that this will be retained.

  7.  BASC recommends that members of the public using the coastal "trail" be required to keep dogs under close control and that dogs be kept on leads at all times on areas of "spreading room". This would not include the use of working dogs being supervised by landowners, occupiers or involved in sporting shooting.

  8.  BASC welcomes the fact that with regard to Natura 2000 sites Natural England will have a duty to carry out an appropriate assessment (in accordance with the Habitat Regulations) to consider the implications of a coastal `trail' and an area of `spreading room' within such sites.

  9.  BASC welcomes recognition of the fact that although some areas of mudflats and saltmarsh are used as beaches by local people, more extensive inter-tidal areas of this type are generally unsuitable for open-air recreation by the public.

  10.  Given the sensitive and dangerous nature of mudflats and saltmarsh and the fact that wildfowling is managed in these areas BASC recommends that these areas are defined as excepted land for "spreading room" seaward or landward of the "trail". In BASC's view this would be consistent with Natural England's stated position that it does not regard it as a priority to offer access to saltmarsh and mudflats.

  11.  BASC welcomes the inclusion of specific guidance on shooting in the outline scheme, and the commitment to work with shoot managers regarding access routes on land that is shot over. BASC supports the alignment of any `trail' to the seaward side of woodland managed for shooting and any land regularly used for driven shoots. BASC recommends that shooting interests need in general to be considered in terms of where the `trail' is aligned—to be provided for in local consultation with landowners and occupiers. BASC would like to see the same provisions made for land used for wildfowling and rough shooting.

  12.  The proposed arrangements for limiting occupiers' liability will still mean that additional costs relating to managing access will have to be met by occupiers.

  13.  BASC welcomes the proposals for land falling within paragraph 1 of CROW Schedule 1 as excepted land, cropped land and intensive grassland. BASC seeks assurances that the crops grown to benefit game and wildlife, which may remain in the ground for two years, are also recognised as excepted land.

  14.  BASC recommends that fair and proportionate compensation should be paid to landowners where a new coastal "trail" and/or "spreading room" is legislated for on their land.

Dr Conor O'Gorman

Land Management Policy Officer

The British Association for Shooting and Conservation

May 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 22 July 2008