Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 200-208)

MR JO BURGON, MR TONY BURTON AND MR GWYN WILLIAMS

9 JUNE 2008

  Q200  Chairman: How much have you spent so far on the path that you have got?

  Mr Burgon: We do not manage that path. We get a grant from Natural England in terms of the National Trail. It is not our path; it is a right of way. We act as an agent for the Highway Authority across our land in Devon and Cornwall. We do not own the 600 miles of the National Trail in the south west. We maintain it over the land that we have responsibility for.

  Q201  Dan Rogerson: Presumably, until we know exactly what form the Bill is going to take, for example, were estuaries to be brought into it, you cannot tell what it might cost?

  Mr Burgon: Yes, and all the spreading room management and all the rest of it.

  Q202  Dan Rogerson: You were telling us before about the role of access authorities, local authorities, being crucial in this. Do you think that the Bill therefore requires greater clarification as to what the responsibilities and liabilities are of the various organisations involved?

  Mr Burgon: Yes.

  Q203  Chairman: When do you think this work is going to be finished that you are doing with Natural England?

  Mr Burgon: I hope this autumn. I think it is quite quick. I have just started discussions with a member of their team.

  Q204  Chairman: So would your recommendation be to this Committee, in the light of Mr Gray's questioning and your reluctance until you finish this work to be a little firmer, that the Government should not contemplate introducing this measure as real legislation as opposed to draft until (a) the work you have done has been completed and evaluated, and (b) they have made it very clear in the light of what you are doing with them just how much resource is going to be available to turn the legislative requirements into reality?

  Mr Burton: I think that is fair and I think that time frame would allow that to happen because I am sure that is the level of scrutiny that it will require as it is going through Parliament. If we can help Natural England inform that process by the autumn that should enable us to come to an effective assessment.

  Q205  Chairman: I just cannot understand the process. We have heard that there are a number of significant players in terms of the access arrangements—local authorities, landowners, bodies like yourself. Then there is the question of farmers and people who cultivate who may need to use environmental schemes, the Higher Level Scheme, for example, to achieve some of the objectives. In other words, it is not a question of money to one group of people; it is a lot of little pots. Is this evaluation going to look at all of those potential pots to come to a number, possibly greater than 50, as the final outcome of this process?

  Mr Burgon: I think you will have to ask Natural England that. I do not know.

  Q206  Chairman: It is not a trick question.

  Mr Burgon: We have not got into that level of discussion.

  Q207  Chairman: You have not?

  Mr Burgon: No.

  Q208  Chairman: So we ought to go back to Natural England and ask that question?

  Mr Burgon: Yes.

  Chairman: Right; we will do that. Jolly good. Thank you very much indeed. You have genuinely been very helpful to us. If, as I said before at the conclusion of our previous session, there are things that occur to you that you would like to confide in the Committee we would be delighted to hear from you. Thank you very much indeed for both your oral and your written contributions today.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 22 July 2008