Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


APPENDIX 17

Memorandum submitted by HM Prison Service

INTRODUCTION

  1.  While the threat of Al Qaeda inspired terrorism is new, HM Prison Service has significant experience of holding prisoners convicted of, or suspected of being involved in, terrorist offences.

NUMBERS

  2.  On 23 October 2007 there were 130 prisoners held under TACT (Terrorism Act) or for TACT related offences in prisons in England and Wales. Of this 130, 59 were on remand, 48 were convicted, 7 were held under BIA powers as detainees, 10 were held under Home Office powers awaiting extradition and 6 others were held for offences related to terrorism; either members of domestic terror groups such as the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) or individuals whose methodology is similar to terrorist organisations although they themselves are not known to be affiliated to any specific group.

  3.  One hundred and thirteen of the 130 were held in High Security Prisons with 49 of them held at Belmarsh, 40 of whom are on remand there. Of the 113, 26 were High Risk Category A, 74 Standard Risk Category A, 3 Category B, 1 Category C and 9 yet to be categorised. Of the remaining 17 held outside High Security Prisons in lower category prisons, many are either individuals on the periphery of Al Qaeda inspired terrorist groups or are members of groups such as the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) or Democratic Revolutionary Movement for the Liberation of Arabistan (DRMLA) imprisoned for offences committed in the 1970s and 1980s.

  4.  Of the 130, 50 are self-declared foreign nationals and 7 are nationality unknown. They come from across North Africa, the Middle East and the Indian Subcontinent, with Algerians and Jordanians representing the largest groupings.

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

  5.  HM Prison Service has a long-standing policy of dispersing prisoners assessed as Category A around High Security Prisons. This has a number of benefits: it prevents large groupings of the most dangerous prisoners being formed; it disrupts attempts to continue their criminal activities; allows better monitoring and tactical management; and allows for the creation of purposeful regimes within a framework of effective security. Historical evidence from around the United Kingdom demonstrates that concentration of terrorist prisoners can have negative outcomes; with the management of HMP The Maze in Northern Ireland a striking example of the effects.

  6.  Given the London-centric focus of the counter-terrorism aspects of the Criminal Justice System, including the Police and HM Courts Service, most remanded TACT and TACT related offenders are held at HMP Belmarsh. However, post sentencing most prisoners are dispersed around the High Security Estate based on a vigorous risk assessment, input from key partner agencies and the offending behaviour and resettlement needs of the prisoner.

  7.  HM Prison Service treats all prisoners, regardless of offence, equally. There are no plans to implement "Special Category" status for terrorist prisoners; we regard terrorists as we regard all prisoners: with criminogenic, personal and resettlement needs that require addressing.

HMPS PROGRAMME OF WORK

  8.  In March 2006, HM Prison Service set up the Extremist Prisoners Working Group (EPWG) to examine the nature, scale and scope of extremism and radicalisation within prisons in England and Wales. This group contained representatives from senior operational and intelligence staff from across the prison estate, the Prison Service Muslim Advisor, Prison Service Muslim chaplains, Home Office, National Offender Management Service, Office of the National Co-ordinator for Special Branch, Metropolitan Police Service Counter Terrorist Command and the Security Service, along with expert academic support. Its recommendations, published in February 2007, identified five key workstreams for implementation by a dedicated HMPS unit.

  9.  HM Prison Service is committed to delivering an extensive programme of work, set out by the EPWG, to tackle extremism in prison. It is divided into five core strands:

    —  training and Awareness Raising;

    —  information and Intelligence Gathering and Analysis;

    —  countering Radicalisation and Facilitating De-radicalisation;

    —  tactical Management of Prisoners; and

    —  development of Policy and Procedure.

  10.  HM Prison Service is actively working with its partner agencies to manage issues around extremist prisoners, ensuring that they are dealt with in such a way as to maximise public protection. The Prison Service's work is part of the Government's CONTEST (counter terrorism) strategy. We discuss operational and strategic issues with our partner agencies on a regular basis.

  11.  HM Prison Service is developing an approach to allow it to challenge extremist ideologies and behaviours and has recently issued guidance to all frontline staff on what to look out for and report on, alongside oral briefings to prison governors. Whilst HM Government assesses Al Qaeda inspired extremism to be the greatest risk, we are also concerned with other extremists within the prison population including:

    —  dissident Irish republicans;

    —  Ulster loyalists;

    —  anarchist, anti-globalisation or anti-capitalist groups;

    —  animal Rights/Liberation activists; and

    —  members of the far right.

  12.  HM Prison Service is committed to diversity and is working to ensure that actions against extremists neither stigmatise Muslim prisoners nor alienate them. We are actively working with Faith and Race Advisors to ensure that training and operational practice targets only those who may be involved in extremist or terrorist activities. We acknowledge that faith can play a positive role in the lives and rehabilitation of prisoners, and there is no suggestion that legitimate expressions of faith are in any way indicative of radicalisation or extremism.

CONCERNS

  13.  HM Prison Service is managing a number of serious risks with these groups of prisoners, including, but not exhaustively:

    —  disruption and/or disorder in prisons;

    —  radicalisation of other Muslims or non-Muslims;

    —  terrorist/criminal activity commissioned by those in prisons; and

    —  serious crimes being perpetrated within a prison.

  14.  These risks could result in inadequate public protection. We are managing and mitigating these risks through the extensive programme of work in outlined in paragraph nine. However, we are concerned that without significant additional funding we will be unable to properly manage these risks.

  15.  Increased numbers of arrests for TACT offences is resulting in a growing number of prisoners remanded or convicted for those offences. We are working with key colleagues across government to assess the likely volumes of terrorist prisoners in future years.

MINISTERIAL OVERSIGHT

  16.  Jack Straw MP, Lord Chancellor, it to take up chairmanship a quarterly Ministerial meeting attended by Ministry of Justice and Home Office Ministers to take stock of prison matters across the CT spectrum.

  17.  Furthermore, David Hanson MP, Prisons Minister receives quarterly briefings on the programme of work being taken forward by HM Prison Service. This is supplemented by further ad hoc briefing where notable or newsworthy matters occur. The Minister has been sighted on the invitation by the Home Affairs Committee that officials present oral evidence and is content this happens.

October 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 19 December 2007