ROMANIAN REACTION
13. We took evidence from the Romanian Under-Secretary
of State for European Affairs and the Acting Romanian Ambassador
to the UK. They told us that the Romanian Government was surprised
and disappointed by what it regards as a discriminatory decision
to continue restrictions, given the UK's support for enlargement
and the expectations it places on its Romanian ally. In its view,
the restrictions were politically-motivated given the low unemployment
rate in Romania, the long-term trend for economic growth and that
preferred destinations for Romanian migrants are in fact Italy,
Spain and Germany:
We believe that the measures taken by the British
authorities are not sufficiently fair or sound
They are
not fair because we think we are paying the cost of measures taken
by the British authorities in 2003-04 in respect of the accession
of the first eight central European countries to the European
Union on 1 May 2004. [13]
14. He also told us that the Romanian Government
supported views expressed by the Joint Council for the Welfare
of Immigrants and the recruitment industry that the A2 regulations
present procedural problems.[14]
The Minister of State has undertaken to look at any further evidence
of complexity to see if the regulations can be simplified.[15]
Conclusion
15. The UK Government is committeed to reviewing
the labour market restrictions for Bulgarian and Romanian workers
again in 12 months time. We reserve the right to revisit the issues
outlined in this report at that time.
1 HC Deb, 24 October 2006, cols 82WS-84WS [Commons
written ministerial statement] Back
2
HC 143-I, Q 1 Back
3
HC Deb, 30 October 2007, cols 34WS-35WS [Commons written ministerial
statement] Back
4
Ev 19 Back
5
Qq 1, 3 Back
6
Q 30 Back
7
Q 35 Back
8
Ev 20 Back
9
Qq 19, 23 Back
10
Q 14 Back
11
Q 6 Back
12
Qq 5, 17 Back
13
Qq 37, 39, 67 Back
14
Qq 44-46, Ev 18-19 Back
15
Q 32 Back