Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Memorandum by Lifeblood: The Thrombosis Charity (PS 15)

PATIENT SAFETY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  Lifeblood: The Thrombosis Charity is pleased to respond to the House of Commons Health Select Committee Inquiry into Patient Safety. As the Medical Director of Lifeblood and a practicing consultant physician, I consult regularly with colleagues from other disciplines and charities on matters of patient care and health policy.

  For the past five years, Lifeblood has been campaigning for new guidelines for medical professionals to identify and treat thrombosis—a condition that the Health Select Committee identified kills in excess of 25,000 people each year in the UK. This is more than five times the number who die from MRSA and C.difficile and is the most common cause of hospital mortality.

  The majority of these deaths from hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis (DVT) can be prevented with simple yet effective risk assessment. The medical term venous thromboembolism (VTE) covers both deep vein thromboses and their consequences pulmonary emboli, which can kill. VTE has a mortality rate of 30% when left untreated, but this drops to just 2-8% with appropriate therapy.

  We have been encouraged by policy progress in this area over the past three years, particularly the Chief Medical Officer's (CMO) Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of VTE in Hospitalised Patients published in April 2007, which identified the need for urgent action to stem the alarming number of deaths from thrombosis. The CMO's crucial recommendation that every hospital patient should be given their own risk assessment for VTE is testament to the importance of this issue. This guidance could save thousands of lives.

  However, we were concerned by the results of an audit carried out by the All-Party Parliamentary Thrombosis Group in November 2007. This report revealed that only one-third of Acute NHS Hospital Trusts are following this advice and universally risk assessing all hospital patients.

  Given the scale of the condition and the lack of evidence that best practice guidelines are being followed, we believe that hospital-acquired DVT remains a public health emergency. The US Health Agency for Research and Quality has identified thromboprophylaxis for those patients at-risk as the number one most important patient safety intervention. Despite the fact that comprehensive best practice guidelines exist to both prevent and manage episodes of VTE, these are being neglected by Acute NHS Hospital Trusts and to this end, those in management of these Trusts must acknowledge that some are posing an unjustifiable risk to patient safety.

  Whilst we hope that the publication of the CMO's National VTE Risk Assessment tool will encourage Trusts to adopt the CMO's April 2007 recommendations, we are concerned that Trusts do not have sufficient incentives to fully implement this. We believe that hospitals need to be audited on the uptake of VTE risk assessment and the quality of their thrombosis protocols or more ideally mandated to risk assess all adult patients on admission. We are confident this will significantly reduce the risk to patient safety and the overall number of preventable hospital deaths.

  In responding we have addressed areas that we feel are of particular relevance to hospital acquired Venous Thromboembolism.

1.   What the risks to patient safety are and to what extent they are avoidable?

  Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is recognised internationally as the number one safety issue in hospital care and the Health Select Committee estimated it causes at least 25,000 deaths in the UK alone[124]. This is greater than the numbers who die from MRSA and C.difficile combined and the most common cause of hospital mortality[125]. It is also the most common cause of cardiovascular death behind heart attack and stroke.

  VTE is, however, preventable with simple yet effective risk assessment and management: VTE has a mortality rate of up to 30% when left untreated, but this drops to just 2-8% with appropriate therapy[126].

  Furthermore, the US Health Agency for Research and Quality has identified thromboprophylaxis for those at risk as the number one most important patient safety intervention. This was based on both the cost and clinical efficacy of the intervention[127].

  We therefore welcomed the Chief Medical Officer's Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of VTE published in April 2007, particularly the crucial recommendation that every hospital patient should be given their own risk assessment for VTE.

  However, it appears that despite the risk posed to patient safety, the majority of Acute NHS Hospital Trusts have failed to implement these guidelines. We were disappointed to learn from an audit undertaken by the All-Party Parliamentary Thrombosis Group in November 2007 that only one-third of Trusts were universally risk assessing patients on admission to hospital[128]. The prevention and management of VTE can consequently be seen as a `systems failure.'

  The clinical diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is unreliable and patients who present with a DVT are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This is why it is crucial that hospitals put emphasis on the prevention rather than the treatment of VTE.

  As mentioned, hospital acquired thrombosis contributes to significantly more deaths than hospital acquired infections, yet, by comparison, public awareness is still relatively low, along with central government resources to tackle this problem. This is a clear example of how the role of public perception of risk is determining NHS policy.

2.  WHAT THE CURRENT EFFECTIVENESS IS OF THE FOLLOWING IN ENSURING PATIENT SAFETY:

    a.  local and regional NHS boards, and other organisations providing NHS services (including primary and community care, and mental health services)

  By not guaranteeing the risk assessment of every patient admitted to hospital, boards of Acute NHS Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities are not effectively safeguarding patient safety. This cannot be attributed to a lack of awareness; the All-Party Parliamentary Thrombosis Group revealed that 99% of all Acute NHS Trusts surveyed were aware of the CMO's April 2007 recommendations[129].

b.   systems for incident reporting, risk management and safety improvement

  Systems for reporting episodes and mortality from VTE are currently inadequate. VTE is chronically under-reported which is why many within the medical field view it as a peripheral area. Under-reporting can be attributed to the decline in the number of post-mortems following the Alder Hey scandal. Consequently an accurate cause of death is often not determined and the death is recorded as having another cause.

  Under-reporting can also be attributed to the fact the majority of VTE episodes develop days or even weeks after a patient has been discharged from hospital. As a result, the healthcare professional who was responsible for the patient's care in the first instance is unlikely to see the patient again and adequate systems are not in existence at many hospitals to inform them that a patient who has been under their care has suffered an event.

  The development of a better system of reporting by Trust management will form an important part of establishing a patient safety culture and changing the attitudes of clinicians towards thrombosis, particularly within Orthopaedics where many surgeons still do not acknowledge the high incidence of hospital-acquired DVT. We recommend that Acute NHS Trust boards review their hospitals' internal reporting mechanisms for VTE. We also recommend more post-mortems are performed when the patient has died at home but has recently been in hospital.

c.   national policy

  As a patient safety care issue, we believe that it would be appropriate for VTE risk assessment and best practice management protocols, to be contained within the Operating Framework alongside hospital-acquired infections. Given the scale of the problem, we believe that to neglect VTE within the Operating Framework is to neglect a commitment to patient safety.

d.   the National Patient Safety Agency and other bodies

  The argument for VTE prevention does not just make good clinical sense but also economic sense. VTE not only causes death, but has a high morbidity with post-thrombotic syndrome and the chronic complications such as recurrent leg ulcers that this can cause, which add further costs to the NHS. The total cost (direct and indirect) to the UK for the management of VTE is estimated to be £640 million[130]. In addition, where patients suffer a fatal thrombosis while under the care of a hospital, this can have expensive legal repercussions for the NHS Litigation Authority.

e.   education for health professionals

  At present, adequate education for health professionals is not made available by Acute NHS Hospital Trust Boards. It is critical to win the hearts and minds of all staff so that patients at every point of entry are risk assessed and managed effectively. Without the support of front line staff, effective uptake of VTE risk assessment cannot be secured. It is important that management is not just telling staff what to do, but also explaining why implementing VTE prevention protocols is beneficial to the patient. Lifeblood believe this would contribute to improved uptake of risk assessment and increase appreciation of hospital acquired VTE as a patient safety hazard. As the Health Select Committee has also previously recognised, this needs to be extended.

3.  WHAT THE NHS SHOULD DO REGARDING PATIENT SAFETY

  As a preventable patient safety hazard that is the commonest cause of hospital mortality, Lifeblood believes that the NHS must face the challenge of implementing recognised VTE best practice at the earliest opportunity. This will require a multifaceted approach and efforts at every level of the NHS.

  Firstly, it is evident to us that Acute NHS Trusts will require incentives to improve the uptake of risk assessment. As with protocols to prevent hospital-acquired infections, we believe that VTE risk assessment should be mandated and included in the Operating Framework.

  In addition, we recommend that the Healthcare Commission assess hospitals on the uptake of risk assessment and the quality of their thromboprophylaxis protocols and include these as indicators in its annual health check. Compliance visits to Acute NHS Trusts would provide an incentive for Trusts to ensure all is being done to prevent VTE in their hospitals, as it currently does with the national hygiene code.

  However, this alone will not improve the uptake of risk assessment. Trusts will need to entrench their protocols through education for clinicians and healthcare professionals, which clarify the rationale for intervening in this way. This is why Lifeblood supports the approach of the National Patient Safety Campaign, which concentrates on educating healthcare professionals not only about the intervention but also the rationale behind the intervention. We would ask that a VTE intervention is adopted by the National Patient Safety Campaign at the earliest opportunity.

  The patient can also be involved in managing their risk of VTE. We recommend that the NHS engage with Lifeblood in a public awareness campaign so that patients and their family are mindful of their risk when entering hospital and prompted to request for a VTE risk assessment. We believe that hospital-acquired thrombosis should have the same, if not greater priority level in the mind of the patient as hospital-acquired infections. In addition, we also recommend that elective patients be sent a pre-admission questionnaire, which would assist in the uptake of VTE risk assessment.

  There is also a role for primary care to play in managing a patient's risk of VTE. As VTEs are most likely to occur after the patient has been discharged, the GPs should be educated about the risks. They also have access to their medical records with details of their risk assessment and prophylaxis. If the patient subsequently dies in the community as a result of a VTE, the GP should be encouraged to communicate this back to the health professional who was responsible for the patient's care whilst in hospital.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  Lifeblood recommends that the following actions are undertaken to address patient safety concerns:

    —  VTE risk assessment be mandated at the earliest opportunity and included in the Operating Framework

    —  The Healthcare Commission to include the uptake of VTE risk assessment and quality of hospitals' thromboprophylaxis protocols as indicators in its annual health check

    —  Pre-admission VTE risk assessment questionnaires to be introduced for elective patients

    —  The National Patient Safety Campaign to acknowledge the evidence of the US Health Agency for Research and Quality and adopt VTE intervention at the earliest opportunity

    —  The boards of Acute NHS Trusts to ensure that all staff are educated not only in the Trusts' VTE prevention and management protocols, but also the rationale for the intervention

    —  All boards of Acute NHS Hospital Trusts to review their systems for internal reporting of incidents of VTE

    —  The NHS to engage in a public awareness campaign to highlight the risk of hospital acquired VTE to the patient

    —  After patients are discharged from hospital, primary care should play an effective role in managing a patient's risk of developing VTE.

Professor Beverley J Hunt

September 2008








124   House of Commons Health Committee. The Prevention of Thromboembolism in Hospitalised Patients, Second report of session 2004-2005. Back

125   National Office of Statistics. Available http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1067 Back

126   Task Force Report: Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Torbicki, EJR, et al. Eur Heart Journal 2000; 21, 1301-1336 Back

127   www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/advances2/vol3/Advances-Flink_57.pdf-2008-07-30 Back

128   http://www.dvtreport.com/ Back

129   http://www.dvtreport.com/ Back

130   House of Commons Health Committee. The Prevention of Thromboembolism in Hospitalised Patients, Second report of session 2004-2005. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 30 October 2008