Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by the Department for International Development, Letter from Shahid Malik MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State

  I promised to follow up some points from the evidence session on 2 June as part of the IDC's inquiry into coordination for aid effectiveness.

PROFESSOR EASTERLY RANKING OF DONORS

  I attach a copy of the Permanent Secretary's letter to you of 12 May 2008 about the recent published research by Professor William Easterly and Tobias Pfutze. This ranked DFID as the top bilateral donor. A copy of the article can be found at:

  www.nyu.edu/fas/institute/dri/Easterly/File/Where_Does_Money_Go.pdf

How do we calculate we lift three million out of poverty every year?

  The committee asked how DFID calculates that we lift 3 million people out of poverty every year. Economic evidence about the effect of aid on growth and of growth on poverty means we can estimate the number of people in each country that DFID pulls out of poverty, based on the amount of aid we give, both to bilateral and to multilaterals. These estimates are based on the Collier and Dollar poverty models which have been influential in allocation decisions of other bilateral and multilateral organisations.

  The Collier and Dollar poverty model combines two relationships. The first is a relationship between aid and growth whereby aid works better where there are good policies. The model shows that the value of aid can increase the average rate of economic growth in countries with good policies by more than in countries with poorer policies. The second basic relationship is between poverty and growth; this looks at how sensitive growth is to the levels of poverty in a given country. Combining these two relationships allows us to estimate for each country the number of poor people that are pulled out of poverty for a given aid allocation. Summed over DFID's entire bilateral and multilateral contributions yields DFID's annual 3 million people pulled out of poverty figure.

Has untying DFID's aid reduced the cost of Technical Cooperation?

  Ann McKechin asked this, given the World Bank estimate that untying global aid would reduce the cost of aid by 25%.

  Untying tends to increase value for money and reduce costs because it increases competition in procurement of goods and services. However, DFID's experience has been that untying alone does not remove business barriers facing developing country suppliers. Most bids for our business continue to come from suppliers based within the UK. We are analysing why this is the case and reviewing our contract terms to make it easier for developing country suppliers to bid for contracts. We hope this will introduce more competition for our business and reduce costs in line with World Bank estimates.

  DFID mainly purchases consultancy services, on which we spent £246m in 2007/8. Consultancy is a generic term describing our contracts with for profit and not-for-profit companies, universities and institutes, and self-employed personnel. Over the last five years, we have been letting fewer but larger contracts, and consultancy now represents only 10% of our aid programme.

  Since 2001 when aid was untied, about 80% of our consultancy business has been awarded to developed country suppliers, mainly from within the UK. Developing country suppliers rarely bid directly for our business, although they pick up work as members of consortia headed by international or developed country organisations.

  We want more developing country suppliers to participate directly in our business. We have analysed the constraints to direct bidding by developing country firms, including by consulting firms based in Africa and Asia. We are now reviewing our contract terms, to introduce greater flexibility in our use of certain clauses which appear most challenging for developing country suppliers to meet for reasons beyond their control.

DFID'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE PARIS DECLARATION EVALUATION

  John Battle mentioned a query during the IDC's visit to Denmark about DFID's contribution to the Paris Declaration evaluation.

  The independent consultants' evaluation report was submitted within the deadline set to enable preparation of the international synthesis report. The full published version which includes DFID's management response will be available by 20 June.

  I hope this is useful. I look forward to hearing the Committee's conclusions on this important enquiry.

23 June 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 17 July 2008