Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Merlin

ABOUT MERLIN

  1.  Merlin is the only UK specialist agency, which responds worldwide with vital healthcare and medical relief for vulnerable people caught up in natural disasters, conflict, disease and health system collapse. Merlin's aim is to ensure that vulnerable people who are excluded from exercising their right to health have equitable access to appropriate and effective healthcare.

  2.  This aim is inspired and underpinned by the World Health Organisation (WHO) declaration[156] that "the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without discrimination of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition". In support of this aim, Merlin works in partnership with global, national and local health agencies and communities to strengthen health systems and build community resilience to better prevent, mitigate and respond to health outcomes.

  This response focuses on a few key areas highlighted by the Inquiry's Terms of Reference.

MAINSTREAMING MATERNAL HEALTH

  3.  In Merlin's view, DFID is working effectively to mainstreaming its maternal health priorities within the broader health policy framework. The department's focus on strengthening health systems prioritised in the new health policy (2007) as a mechanism for improving maternal health outcomes is welcome. In our view, progress towards the health MDGs can only be achieved by working in support of national health plans aimed at strengthening the effectiveness of the health sector and not through single issue interventions.

  4.  DFID cites maternal mortality as the best single indicator of the effectiveness of a country's health system. Merlin welcomes this focus on maternal mortality as a key indicator. Maternal mortality impacts significantly on newborn and child health—a child is 2 to 3 times more likely (than other children) to die if its mother dies—however this focus on maternal health is not reflected in the same way by other donors or international institutions. DFID is in a good position to influence other donor priorities in this area and Merlin would welcome their efforts to do so.

  5.  The priorities set by the maternal health strategy in 2004—to raise the profile of maternal mortality, find ways to scale up interventions address socio-economic barriers to access and develop and apply new knowledge—remain critical areas for development. DFID's second progress report (2007) recognises shortfalls in achieving these and acknowledges that further progress will require significant investment in human resources for heath and support for health services over the long term. Merlin fully endorses this approach; current humanitarian mechanisms are typically short term (12-18 months), and are inappropriate to support long term investment in human resources. While DFID's policy commitment to long term support is welcome this must be supported by appropriate long term funding mechanisms.

  6.  The challenge (for DFID and all health actors) is to translate these policy commitments at headquarters level to effective programming and financing mechanisms at country level, particularly in fragile states. Engaging with partners, particularly at local level must continue to be a key priority for DFID in the area of maternal health. While the approach of working with Governments has its advantages in terms of political commitment and broad scale of operations, it can lack the depth of partnership, commitment to equity and empowerment that Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) can offer. Failure to secure involvement of these stakeholders, which includes women themselves, will result in slow progress. CSOs can play a pivotal role in addressing the "three delays"; they often have the depth of relation with communities to design and implement strategies around understanding of local context and the issues faced by communities.

ENGAGING WITH BILATERAL AND MULTILATERAL INSTITUTIONS

  7.  DFID seeks to, and has been effective in, influencing international partners in accordance with its pro-poor agenda. The challenge for the department will be to maintain this influence in the face of growing multilateral disbursements (eg through the World Bank). DFID has rightly developed a reputation as a strong advocate for the poor and there is some concern that this voice could be diluted. The proposed reductions in staffing levels are also cause for concern as ODA disbursements increase.

  8.  Merlin welcomes DFID's call for the number of global health initiatives to be rationalised and welcomes the introduction of the new International health Partnership. Global Health Initiatives should support strengthening of health systems that deliver health services more broadly.

EMERGENCY OBSTETRIC CARE

  9.  In considering the broader determinants of maternal health, DFID's strategy (2004) has a strong focus on the provision and strengthening of emergency obstetric care at BEOC/CEOC[157] level. While this focus is important, it is vital that DFID interventions promote the continuum of care at community/household level, where women are at greatest risk from two of the "three delays": the delay associated with the decision to seek care; the delay in arrival at the point of care and the delay in the provision of adequate care. It is important that mothers are able to recognise danger signs, be aware of the services available and how to reach them. A Knowledge Practise Coverage Survey carried out by Merlin in Ayeyarwaddy Division, Burma in December 2005 (see Annex) showed that only a very small proportion of mothers knew about maternal related (pregnancy, delivery and postpartum) danger signs. This finding is not untypical and a holistic approach is needed to address all of these key delays as one entity, not just a focus on emergency obstetric care.

  10.  While the first two "delays" require action at the household and community level, addressing the third delay alone—by improving capacity for emergency obstetric care at the health care level—is unlikely to be effective if there is no community demand for services. This emphasis on creating demand for services sits well with DFID's policy objective of promoting good governance and enabling local people to call health service providers to account.

AVAILABILITY OF TRAINED STAFF TO MEET MDG 5

  11.  Merlin welcomes the department's strong commitment to promote and support the development of human resources for health. The lack of human resources for health is one of the most serious constraints to achieving the health MDGs, particularly within the context of fragile or transitional contexts. The rise in the burden of communicable disease combined with chronic under investment in health systems means that many countries face acute health systems collapse.

  12.  Access to appropriately trained health workers for many women during pregnancy and childbirth is poor. Evidence from Merlin's programmes in Ayeyarwaddy Division, Burma focusing on determinants of maternal health shows that most deliveries—up to 89%—occur in the home, attended by unskilled and untrained birth attendants, most commonly by "traditional birth attendants" (see Annex). There is considerable discourse about the use of unskilled TBAs; the challenge in many fragile states is that human resource development is currently at very low levels. In Merlin's view alternative solutions, such as developing core competencies might be considered and the department could support innovative approaches to training and development.

  13.  DFID has made clear commitments to supporting 10 year plans for health system support, with particular note to strengthening human resources—including development and training, recruitment and retention. The department has demonstrated a willingness to support existing health staff by providing financing for incentives for health workers in underserved areas or where governments are unable or unwilling to pay salaries. In the absence of predictable financing for the health sector, donor support for incentives payments is a viable way of supporting recruitment and retention of health workers. The difficulty is that DFID's policy approach in this area is not supported by other key donors. Conflicting donor approaches vis-a"-vis support for incentives/salaries means that at field level health facilities in one area might receive support for incentives while neighbouring facilities supported by a different donor do not. The tendency for donors to split areas geographically can lead to practical inconsistencies and impact on people's ability to access health care.

REFERENCES

Reducing maternal deaths: Evidence and Action. A strategy for DFID. DFID (2004).

Eliminating World Poverty. Making Governance Work for the Poor. DFID (2006).

DFID's Maternal Health Strategy. Reducing maternal deaths: Evidence and Action. Second progress Report. DFID (2007).

Working Together for Better Health. DFID (2007).

September 2007



156   As reflected in the WHO constitution (1946), Alma Ata Declaration (1976) and World Health Assembly (1998). Back

157   Basic Essential Obstetric Care and Comprehensive Essential Obstetric Care. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 2 March 2008