Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by RESULTS UK

EDUCATION IS MORE THAN JUST NUMBERS

1.   Summary

  1.1  Although the world has made progress in cutting the numbers of children without access to education since the1990s, there is still work to do. As the Prime Minister and DFID have pointed out, it is estimated that over 70 of 94 poor countries still have some type of education user fees and there are many other costs that families have to bear, such as paying for school uniforms, books and meals. Barriers related to secondary school are even more difficult for poor families to overcome.

  1.2  In addition, it is important to recognize that it is not just about "bums on seats". While universal access is a necessary prerequisite, it is not sufficient. The quality of the education delivered is as important as the number who receive it and the ability of donors to respond to urgent transitional needs when countries scale up their enrolment and provide effective support for improving quality is critical.

  1.3  In our submission we recommend that the UK government uses its considerable influence at the World Bank to ensure that the potential decline in Bank lending to education in Africa is halted and reversed and that the Bank gives more emphasis to the quality of education resulting from its inputs, along with a continued emphasis on access. Specifically, along with the abolition of school fees, provision must be made for the recruitment of well-trained teachers unrestricted by wage ceilings and more work should be put into the use of appropriate learning outcomes and their determinants.

2.   Background

  2.1  The number of children out of school has dropped from over 100 million in the 1990s to 77 million in 2005. The great declarations on universal primary education from the 1990 World Conference on Education for All, through the 2000 World Education Forum, to the G8 promises of 2005 have focused attention on the need to improve access to education and it is clear that good progress is being made towards Education for All.

  2.2  However, there is still a long way to go and continued barriers to access must be eliminated—particularly continuing formal financial barriers, but also informal ones. Too many children remain invisible. For example, when Burundi abolished school fees they planned for an additional 250,000 children to come into the classroom, but over twice that number turned up. These were children who were not even on the government's radar screen.

  2.3  In order to keep children in the classroom and ensure a meaningful outcome to their education, attention must be given to the quality of the education delivered. This takes resources, careful implementation and monitoring of learning outcomes. Formally scrapping fees must be accompanied by major increases in national and external financing or increased enrolment will not be sustained and learning outcomes not met.

  2.4  Clearly, enrolment and quality must be addressed simultaneously by providing adequate external support for countries to effectively scale up schools and make learning outcomes a core objective for all primary education projects. Countries must learn from the best practices and lessons learned by other countries and plan to address learning outcomes as access is being scaled up. Experience shows that it is more difficult to retrofit quality onto a system that is already suffering from lack of teachers and resources. Yet at the same time, countries must not be forced to make the impossible choice of preserving some level of quality by excluding a third or more of all children.

3.   Teacher recruitment and training

  3.1  Quality of education relies first and foremost on the supply of well-trained, properly paid teachers. Worldwide it is suggested that 18 million new teachers will be needed by 2015, four million in Africa alone, to meet the target of providing quality primary education for all children.

  3.2  When tuition fees in primary schools are abolished in order to achieve universal enrolment, teacher recruitment and training must be massively scaled up to respond.

  3.3  However, care must be applied in the use of strategies to address the shortage of teachers. Although incentives such as shorter training courses can work to speed up the supply of teachers, they must not be at the expense of effective training. Poorly trained teachers cannot provide the quality of delivery required to engage the children and improve their skills.

  3.4  The use of untrained non-professional teachers, while appropriate in some circumstances, is not an effective long-term solution. Poor teaching by staff who are not adequately trained, hired on low wages and offered no job security, leads to high drop-out rates and poor learning outcomes. This should not be viewed as a viable solution to the problem of teacher shortages.

4.   Funding

  4.1  In terms of overall funding for education, aid to basic education in low-income countries rose from $1.8 billion in 2000 to $3.4 billion in 2004. Although pledges made so far will increase this to $5.4 billion by 2010, this is still far short of the $10 billion per year that will be needed.

  4.2  The UK government's pledge of £8.5 billion for education over 10 years in April this year is an enormously important step and can and should be used to further leverage not only other bilateral donor commitments but also increased commitment by the World Bank and other international financial institutions. There is a particular opportunity to ensure quality national education plans via the Fast Track Initiative (FTI).

  4.3  Since its inception in 2002, the FTI has proven to be an effective multi-donor mechanism, funding countries with strong national plans and enabling donors to coordinate their aid. Yet the UK's contribution to the FTI still represents only 10-15% of its overall spending on education and has not risen since the increased overall pledge in April.

  4.4  The UK must ensure that future spending on the FTI from 2009 onwards reflects the increased pledge, with a focus on ensuring access linked to quality.

  4.5  In contrast to the UK's increased commitment to education, the World Bank's lending on education has not increased substantially in recent years. Lending for education in Africa, for example, has fallen from $472.6 million in 2002 to $339.3 in 2006. And there are worrisome indications that the fall could be more precipitous for 2008. As of mid 2007, there was only one World Bank loan for education in Africa of all loans listed in the 2008 pipeline for education. This is an alarming trend that must be investigated and addressed.

5.   All children deserve a quality education

  5.1  As the largest external funder of education, the World Bank has a responsibility to ensure that its lending increases in line with the need. It must also ensure that the education supplied is of good quality and sustainable by helping countries to increase the supply of well-trained teachers, reduce student drop-out rates and monitor learning outcomes.

  5.2  Better collaboration between the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is needed to ensure that IMF-driven public sector wage ceilings and budget do not make it difficult for governments to hire all the teachers they need. Recent research in sub-Saharan Africa has shown that a major factor behind the chronic shortage of teachers is IMF policies that have required countries to freeze teacher recruitment.

  5.3  The Bank also needs to work with its partners to reframe the priorities of the FTI to include improved learning outcomes as along with a continued focus on enrolment and completion. This would entail the inclusion of learning achievement indicators in country's FTI proposals as well as a recognition by the Bank that funding must take into account the unit costs of providing schooling that actually teaches children basic literacy and numeracy.

  5.4  The UK government has a vital role to play in influencing the World Bank to ensure that it plays a central role in provision of resources for basic education, especially in Africa, addressing both the removal of barriers to education and the quality of that education.

    "In many countries not all children have the opportunity to enter a classroom or gain basic literacy or numeracy skills, as there are simply not enough qualified teachers. This has negative outcomes not only for the future of individual children, but also for the development of whole societies."

    Director-General of UNESCO, Ko­chiro Matsuura, in a message marking World Teachers' Day, 5 October 2007.

EMPOWER THE POOR THROUGH MICROFINANCE

  1.1  Microfinance has proven to be one of the most effective development tools available for empowering the poorest in society to break free from poverty and deprivation. Despite its record of success, microfinance remains underutilised by the World Bank.

  1.2  In fiscal Year 2006 the World Bank, through the International Finance Corporation, invested US$132 million in microfinance. The Bank has since confirmed that it can not fully or accurately assess the precise level of IDA funding dedicated to microfinance. Similarly the Bank is unable to state with any certainty what proportion of that funding is reaching those living on less than US$1 a day.

  1.3  The World Bank should afford greater priority to microfinance initiatives, recognising its valuable contribution to poverty reduction and development. Furthermore we recommend the following important measures to the World Bank for their consideration:

    (a)  The World Bank should scale up its microfinance programmes, enhancing their capacity and global reach. This can only be achieved through greater investment.

    (b)  The Bank should seek to ensure that at least half of all microfinance resources benefit those living on less than US$1 a day

    (c)  Cost-effective poverty measurement tools should be used to measure the poverty level of borrowers and thereby ensure compliance with that goal; and

    (d)  The World Bank should report on the results in an open and transparent manner.

RESPOND TO AFRICA'S TB EMERGENCY

  1.1  Africa continues to bear the brunt of the global TB epidemic, remaining the only continent where TB cases continue to rise. The combination of weak health systems, grinding poverty and high rates of HIV/AIDS have all contributed to a trebling of the number of TB cases and deaths since 1990 (WHO 2007).

  1.2  The scale of the TB epidemic is so great that in August 2005, African Ministers of Health and the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared TB a continent-wide health emergency. A year later the first cases of extensively drug resistant TB (XDR-TB) were reported, adding a new and deadly dimension to the already severe health crisis. The World Bank's commitment to tackling tuberculosis is crucial if the international community is to effectively deal with the crisis.

  1.3  There are now about 12 million people infected with both HIV and TB—70% of these cases being in Sub-Saharan Africa. The TB emergency is dramatically increasing mortality rates amongst those infected with HIV. Treating TB is therefore one of the most effective ways of reducing AIDS deaths.

  1.4  Despite the inextricable link between HIV/AIDS and TB only a few of the World Bank's multi-country HIV/AIDS programmes included a dedicated TB component. Though the Bank does provide TB funding in the way of budget support and sector wide health investments, it is unable to accurately report the scale or extent to which these programmes directly benefit TB control.

  1.5  In 2006 the civil society organisation RESULTS International reported that the Bank devotes less than 1% of health sector financing for Africa to TB, despite a US$11 billion funding gap to achieve the MDG for TB in Africa.[117]

  1.6  TB control has proven to be amongst the most economically effective health interventions that can be made. The World Bank has to its credit recognised this fact in principle, it is now time for the Bank to follow through and give TB control the increased attention and investment that it deserves.

  1.7  The UK government should seek to persuade the World Bank to significantly scale up its commitment to fighting TB in Africa, investing at least US$ 1.1 billion over the next decade.

10 October 2007








117   In July 2007, WHO launched the MDR-TB & XDR-TB Global Response Plan, which calls for an additional (ie, over the resource needs identified by the Global Plan) $700 million and $1 billion worldwide in 2007 and 2008 to respond the emergence and spread of drug-resistant TB. WHO estimates that at least an additional $1 billion will be needed annually from 2009-15. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 5 March 2008