Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Written Evidence


Written evidence from the Northern Ireland Prison Service

THE BLUEPRINT FOR DEVELOPING THE NORTHERN IRELAND PRISON SERVICE IN THE 21ST CENTURY

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Prison Service recognises the need for long-term strategic plans and continuous improvement in the effective management of the prisoner population and the development of the prison estate. The Government has set high expectations on the quality and timely delivery of services to prisoners by the Prison Service.

  2.  The unique and difficult operating conditions and tensions of the past 30 years have constrained the Service in developing the estate and its functions in a way that is conducive to positive reintegration of prisoners back into the community, and to reducing re-offending on release.

  3.  Current conditions, including the continuing peace process in Northern Ireland, the local Assembly, the prospect of devolution and recent criminal justice measures, have provided the Service with the opportunity to take a fresh look at the prison estate and its core business to ensure that the way people are held in custody meets the expectations of the courts, respects their Human Rights and takes forward the public protection agenda to reduce re-offending.

  4.  Given the complexity of managing prison establishments, as well as meeting the diverse and individual needs of prisoners, this will be a considerable challenge, requiring a concerted change programme over many years.

  5.  The Prison Service Senior Management, therefore, has decided to develop a holistic long-term strategy for the Service. This will include recruiting and deploying its staff more representatively and more efficiently to provide for the full range of prisoner supervision and interaction responsibilities, reducing unit costs and developing the prison estate to meet the needs of the projected population for the next 10-15 year period.

  6.  The developments and strategies proposed in this report will form the basis for meeting this challenge.

  7.  NIPS will deliver strategies within the Blueprint Programme and, in doing so, will take into account its obligations to comply with the Human Rights Act and will have regard for international human rights standards.

STRAND 1

Prisoner population trends

  8.  Since early 2001 the prison population has risen by over 70%. It is anticipated that the prison population will continue to rise on an annual basis without any prospect of a significant reduction in the mid to long term. This is already placing increased pressure on existing prisoner accommodation and facilities. Significant doubling of prisoners (ie two prisoners sharing a cell) is now taking place at Maghaberry.

  9.  An analysis of the projected prisoner population has been undertaken, and independently quality assured, to determine the future rate of growth, this has indicated that the current population level is likely to increase by as much as 50% over the next 10-15 year period. NIPS have looked at a series of population projections based upon Her Majesty's Prison Service (HMPS) in England and Wales and the Scottish Prison Service (SPS), as well as medium and short term trend models. The projected population, should it continue to increase, could rise to between 2,400 and 2,900, with an average of 2,700. For the purposes of planning NIPS have taken a growth rate of 5% over the next two years and 4% thereafter. (The actual growth will be kept under close review). On two dates in October 2007—17 and 27—the Prisoner population, at 1,518, rose to its highest since 29 September 1998. Although proposals are in hand relating to alternatives to custody and improving the effectiveness of intervention, detailed analysis suggests that these will not have a major impact on the population growth. Indeed proposed legislation for public protection and other sentences are likely to lead to further increases.

  10.  The current limited accommodation impacts on the Service's operational ability and flexibility to locate prisoners appropriately and work with them according to their appropriate security categorisation and to address their resettlement needs.

Prisoner security categorisation

  11.  A new approach has been developed for identifying prisoners' security categorisation to ensure that they are managed at the lowest level of security and in appropriate conditions. Internal analysis has shown that the current security categorisation has tended to skew ratings towards medium to high risk, whereas in practice the majority should be in the lower risk categories. Testing conducted on the new security categorisation model has borne this out.

  12.   Implementation of the new system commenced in November 2007, and is to be completed by March 2008. Over time this will help to establish more appropriate staff to prisoner ratios in various locations across all prison sites. Work has been taken forward in refining the proposed model with input from Governing Governors and Security departments.

Developmental activity for Prisoners

  13.  Daily constructive activities for prisoners play an essential part in developing the skills required for successful resettlement back into the community. NIPS analysis has shown that the existing constructive activity provision for prisoners is insufficient for the current and future prison population.

  14.  A strategy is proposed that will enable the Service to address the multiple and diverse needs of the expanding prison population and thereby reduce re-offending. The strategy distinguishes between developmental and non-developmental activity, and prioritises developmental activity to be delivered to all prisoners, across a range of skill sets within a core week.

  15.  The full implementation of this strategy is dependent on resource availability, and on other changes taking place across the Service. The strategy will be implemented on an incremental basis.

Future role of prison establishments

  16.  The role of the prison establishments must take account of the inevitable requirement in Northern Ireland's small system for co-location of diverse prisoner types, as well as the projected population size. These requirements and population growth projections can be best met in the foreseeable future within a future estate comprising two adult male prison establishments, of which one is envisaged to be a new build prison to replace Magilligan Prison. Hydebank Wood is planned to continue as the third establishment for Young Offenders. It currently houses women prisoners too and a separate options appraisal is looking at the scope in the longer term.

  17.  The work programme for Strand 1 focused on inter-related objectives concerning prisoner population forecasts, constructive activity to meet the needs of prisoners, their security classification and the future role of establishments. In the course of the work programme, new proposals were formed on constructive activity and security classification and the existing methodology for projecting the future prison population was refined. These proposals and the methodology were informed by best practice principles that emerged during research in other jurisdictions (GB and Ireland).

  18.  In the development of these policies the Prison Service sought advice, input and quality assurance from the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Branch (SRB) and from Queen's University Belfast, as well as colleagues from prison services in other jurisdictions who generously shared their ideas, policies and time. The development of these proposals and the accompanying evaluation of existing resources and practices was a platform to inform other subsequent work streams in the Strategic Development Programme.

STRAND 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRISON SERVICE ESTATE

  19.  The Estate Strategy relates to the future development of the prison estate within Northern Ireland over the next 10 years and beyond. It creates a long term view of the projects necessary to meet the organisation's needs and provides a vehicle to plan, manage and deliver the projects in a more cost effective and coherent fashion. It builds upon the work in Strand 1. The prison estate has, in the past, been driven reactively in responding to the needs and demands of the "Troubles" over the last 30 plus years. The result has been a piece-meal approach to both the roll-out of the capital programme and the overall development of the estate. For the first time the Service has sought proactively to provide a robust assessment of present and future needs which will help support the future strategic direction of the Service and its estate.

Assessment of maintenance and fitness for purpose of the existing accommodation

  20.  The current prison estate consists of three establishments, as well as a separate prisoner assessment unit, a training college and a headquarters, (Belfast Prison having closed in 1996 and the Maze in 2000). Each of the three establishments is currently configured to hold a population for which they were not originally designed. As a result each establishment has had to accommodate a wide range of categories of prisoner with an unprecedented level of complexity in Maghaberry, and the movement of females to accommodation within the male Young Offenders Centre at Hydebank Wood. The result is an uneasy mix of prisoner categories housed in close proximity with each other in accommodation that is not appropriate to meet modern needs.

HMP Maghaberry

  21.  HMP Maghaberry opened in 1986 and was divided into two distinct areas. A male prison, developed from a 1960s design at Frankland. With an original design capacity of 450, it currently houses over 820 male prisoners. A smaller prison, originally housing women, with a capacity for 56, known as Mourne House, is located adjacent to the male prison on the Maghaberry site. Mourne House was modelled on the concept of the smaller residential units found at Cornton Vale in Scotland. The women were moved to Hydebank in 2004. Two additional blocks, Bush and Roe, were added to the male prison during the mid 1990's, increasing the male capacity by a further 192. All accommodation benefits from in-cell sanitation.

  22.  Bush and Roe cells offer a marked improvement in design terms over any other cellular accommodation within the estate. They feature wide landings with clear lines of sight allowing easier supervision of prisoners. Following the Steele report in 2003, the blocks were enhanced with additional grilles and camera coverage and now house the separated population. The balance consists of square block houses which have been criticised in HMCIP reports in 2002 and 2006.

  23.  The prison suffers further from a lack of adequate support facilities for catering, education, healthcare and vocational training. It contains a complex range of prisoner categories from separated through to remands and, because of this, all prisoners tend to be treated in the same manner—as high risk. The inadequate design, particularly in the block houses, reinforces this culture of high risk and is reflected in high staffing levels compared to that achieved in England and Wales, and those possible in facilities of a more modern design. This culture of high risk and the presence of separated prisoners has also promoted a lack of engagement between officers and inmates.

HMP Magilligan

  24.  HMP Magilligan, with the capacity to hold 446 prisoners, is a medium to low risk establishment approximately six miles from Coleraine and 70 miles from Belfast. It opened in 1972 on the site of an old prisoner of war camp, some of whose buildings remain in use today. The site is sub-divided into two distinct areas—a small low risk element adjacent to the main prison, surrounded by a perimeter fence; and the main prison itself, inside the wall, which caters for medium risk prisoners and incorporates three H-blocks, an administration building and the bulk of support services.

  25.  It is widely recognised that there is a requirement to replace the cells and infrastructure at Magilligan where the facilities comprise a mixture of temporary single storey buildings (timber framed sectional buildings), corrugated steel facilities (circa 1940) and flat roofed H-blocks (erected as short term accommodation in the 1970's) all of which are in need of replacement. All cells lack in-cell sanitation.

  26.  The prison currently holds low risk and medium risk offenders nearing the end of their sentence. However, due in part to its relatively remote location in relation to Maghaberry and courts, it cannot hold remand prisoners. Neither can it hold the large majority of medium, high risk or separated prisoners. The dispersed nature of the site, with its inappropriate and poorly designed facilities, also lends itself to high staffing levels, and a lack of engagement and association.

Hydebank Wood Prison and Young Offenders Centre

  27.  Hydebank Wood was opened in 1978 to provide 240 places for young offenders. The facility comprises five blocks holding between 52 and 64 inmates, one of which now holds women. All blocks will very shortly include in-cell sanitation. Ancillary services have been improved in recent years, including a new visitor's centre and skills centre.

  28.  In June 2004 the female population (encompassing all ages and categories of prisoner) were transferred to Ash House at Hydebank Wood from Mourne House. However, it is not appropriate long-term accommodation, and it has been accepted that a new purpose built female facility is appropriate. While the Hydebank estate is in an improving condition, work is needed to improve healthcare, gymnasium, trade and other facilities.

Wider estate

  29.  Elsewhere the Service has a training college located remotely from the main prison estate. Comprising 30 acres, with 22 houses in addition to the main building, the Prison Service is currently assessing the potential for planning permission and future disposal of the site. As part of the development of an Integrated Training College for Northern Ireland, NIPS has agreed to co-locate its training facilities at the Desertcreat site near Cookstown, in partnership with the PSNI and Fire and Rescue Services. The relocation is not expected before 2011-12.

  30.  The Prison Service headquarters is located in part of Dundonald House which is owned by the Department of Finance and Personnel and is located on the Stormont Estate. It, too, is inappropriate, and, due to a lack of office space, three of the branches are located remotely from Dundonald House in prefabricated sectional buildings. The Workplace 2010 initiative has recently been launched which seeks the sale and lease back of numerous Government buildings, including Dundonald House, through the vehicle of PPP. It is envisaged that this will create open plan environments. The Service intends to remain on the Stormont Estate, as part of the wider Criminal Justice system there.

Estate short-comings

  31.  The Service has carried out an assessment of its estate against the criteria of safety of staff and prisoners, flexibility in its management and in-cell sanitation. As previously outlined, the estate has some poorly designed and inappropriate facilities, principally on its adult male sites, which also happen to be the areas of greatest pressure in terms of population growth. Management of the stock is limited in that, due to the inadequate facilities and location of the Magilligan site, there is limited flexibility between locations and a high level of complexity at the high security prison at Maghaberry. In respect of sanitation almost 35% of the prison estate still lacks in-cell facilities nearing the end of 2007.

Alternative design solutions

  32.  The Service has conducted extensive research through the United Kingdom and Ireland in looking at best practice in design solutions which meet the criteria previously identified, and achieve the staffing efficiencies, cost reductions and value for money objectives demanded for public finance. The proposals for new accommodation must not only address the inadequacies of our existing stock, but also provide the flexibility and capacity to provide for the rising prisoner population over the next 10-15 years.

  33.  The examples of best practice viewed and analysed indicate that the use of X or L Blocks provides for the best solution, offering improvements in the supervision and management of inmates, whilst also bringing increased efficiency in operational costs.

  34.  One key issue in providing future facilities is how best the delivery can be managed to ensure they are delivered on time and to cost. The Service is examining the model which will best provide for delivery to time and cost, whether through the continuing use of Central Procurement Division (CPD) -DOE—or the use of specialised consultancy or management contractors. More strategically, the Service will also evaluate in more detail (at the stage of the outline business case) whether there is an argument for future new or replacement prisons to be built using Public Private Partnership (PPP) or through capital expenditure. An Options Appraisal was commissioned by the Minister which is required to report in late 2007. This major exercise, in which the Strategic Investment Board has been fully involved, is nearing completion. It is intended to enable Ministers to take firm decisions on the future estate strategy. (See also the final section.)

Options in relation to the site

  35.  The relative remoteness of the Magilligan site and its requirement for a complete purpose-built replacement offer a possible option of re-locating the facility.

  36.  In line with the population projections of Strand 1 and the future role of prisons, the Service clearly needs two adult male prisons. A search has been undertaken of existing Crown land to locate suitably sized sites in appropriate locations. (In the event that no suitable locations are available this might be extended to commercial sites.)

Potential consequences for employment in local areas

  37.  The Prison Service commissioned BDO Stoy Hayward to undertake an assessment of the socio-economic impact of the location of the second adult prison replacing Magilligan in varying localities within Northern Ireland. The report assessed the comparative impact on the local economy, and of tourism in the Limavady area, of siting the second adult prison on the Magilligan site and on sites yet to be identified in three other localities. It concluded that the siting of the prison was unlikely to have any significant effect on tourism and that the impact on the Limavady local economy was likely to be a reduction of between 0.17% (if the new prison is built at Magilligan) and 1.09% if it was built in either the Lisburn or Portadown/Craigavon/Dungannon areas. If it is built in the Ballymena area the adverse impact on the economy of the Limavady area was assessed at around 0.6%. The report was published by NIPS in 2006.

STRAND 3: THE SERVICE'S APPROACH TO CONTESTABILITY

  38.  Contestability is a measure of the extent to which a market is open to new entry. One question for the Northern Ireland Prison Service is how much it can, or should, engage the private sector in the provision of custodial services. Strand 3 initially reviewed the introduction of private sector provision in the US, Australian, Canadian, and European Markets with specific emphasis on the England and Wales experience. HMPS is a major innovator in the provision of new prisons by the private sector, with all new prisons since 1993 provided by this route, using the Design, Construct, Manage and Finance (DCMF) model. The report noted that France and Germany had also used a hybrid private sector model but retained the core custodial function within the public sector. The report also noted that the private sector had thus far engaged in new prisons and not in replacing existing public sector prisons.

  39.  One perceived outcome of this policy was the driving down of costs within the public sector as contestability had encouraged cost effective and more competitive solutions. This has been re-inforced in recent years with the split into a purchaser/provider role with the creation of the National Offender Management System (NOMS) covering prisons and probation services. The reports concluded, however, that whilst HMPS had taken this path, it represented only 11% of its total capacity.

  40.  In addition, an analysis of the potential risks was undertaken in 2006 in relation to both the DCMF and the hybrid model.

STRAND 4: EXPLORING THE OPTION OF CONTRACTING-OUT THE FULL RANGE OF ESCORT SERVICES—PRISONER ESCORT AND COURT CUSTODY SERVICES (PECCS)

  41.  This strand originated from the Hamill review in May 2005 and appraised the option of contracting out Escort Services as opposed to what he described as re-activating the Prisoner Custody Option (PCO). As part of the then ongoing NIPS efficiency programme, NIPS had previously planned to recruit around 80 Prisoner Custody Officers (PCOs) to replace the fully trained prison officers working in the Prisoner Escort Group (PEG). It was also felt that the same new grade of officer should be used to take over the magistrates' courts duties from the PSNI and replace Police Officers in the management of detained persons at courts, and for transporting prisoners between the courts and prisons. Whilst this was delayed for various reasons, a private sector contractor was appointed to provide temporary cover whilst the options were reviewed.

  42.  The study considered a range of options in relation to Escorting including full privatisation, in-house bids and competitive tendering. It also considered the potential scope of the work by extending it to cover further escorting for the PSNI and Youth Justice Agencies. Furthermore the scope also included "Bedwatches" (when a prisoner has to spend time in a hospital in the community) and temporary release escorting which are currently provided by Prison Officers withdrawn from normal duties. The implications of Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE) were also considered and legal advice was sought on the potential legal and financial implications.

  43.  The study concluded that PCO and full privatisation were the only realistic options. The PCO option would have several advantages and might be expected to create a base on which progress was possible on a wide range of issues. A privatisation option would be likely to have the opposite effect but would reduce NIPS management's role in relation to the work when contracted out. The study concluded that agreement must be reached with the staff side on terms and conditions and the other matters identified.

  44.  After discussion the POA indicated their willingness to engage and, following Ministerial approval in early April 2006, NIPS pursued the PCO option. After an agreed period a proposal, including a comprehensive delivery plan, was further approved by the Minister in September 2006. This included the merger of the current Prisoner Escort Group and the (private) Maybin contract into a new group termed the Prisoner Escort and Court Custody Service (PECCS) which assumed operational responsibility on 5 February 2007. A total of 101 staff from Maybin were contracted into the Service under TUPE regulations as part of this project. This was projected to provide significant annual savings, although since 2005, court sittings have increased by 14% and this has put additional demands and pressure on PECCS, delaying the full release of main grade officers.

STRAND 5: REWARD AND RECOGNITION

  45.   A major part of NIPS cost is that of labour. For various reasons the salaries of many Prison Officers in Northern Ireland are higher than in the remainder of the United Kingdom.

  46.  In the late 1990's NIPS recruited Auxiliary Officers in a support role. They were required to perform a reduced range of roles at a reduced cost, though, after review, they are regraded as Prison Officers, and the salary levels are higher. NIPS plans to extend the use of support grades, using Operational Support Grades (OSGs), to release Prison Officers from those roles which do not require the full range of duties, to those front line duties where there is greater interaction with prisoners. This will in part provide the full range of Officers required to meet the current Target Staffing Level (TSL), reduce the level of overtime or Additional Emergency Hours (AEH) required to cover for staff shortages, sickness, bedwatches, death in service or through retirement. Furthermore it will provide capacity to meet the requirements for staffing new accommodation (RTUs).

  47.  As part of the future development of NIPS there is a need to provide for a change in the manner in which the Service and its officers operate and engage with prisoners. The role of the Prison Officer in engaging directly in rehabilitation, education and prevention of re-offending will be central to achieving this. Gradual implementation of support grades with an enhanced role for front-line Prison Officers is seen as the most productive way forward. Over time there will be sufficient ventilation of staff to reduce the overall staffing costs substantially.

  48.  A three year pay and efficiency package was agreed with the PGA/POA, Treasury and the Pay Review Body. Implemented in late April 2007, it delivered up front efficiencies of 10% in the deployment of staff.

HR strategy

  49.  In support, a comprehensive Human Resource Strategy has been developed. New accommodation will be needed and additional programmes and interventions will be required to deliver the resettlement agenda. Managers will face new challenges in addressing these changes, as well as the Service bringing in different grades of staff. Another is likely to be the changing of emphasis away from security and control towards a greater degree of engagement and intervention. This will involve significant training. The Human Resource Strategy for the NIPS addresses these issues and sets out a programme of delivery. Separately the Service is also finalising its diversity strategy to ensure that, over time, the composition of the workforce more closely reflects the population from which it is drawn. Good progress has been made in recent competitions.

STRAND 6: EFFICIENCY PROGRAMME PROJECTS

  50.  This strand of work was carried across from the original "Delivering Better Value" Programme reviewed by Hamish Hamill as part of the SR2004 settlement. It encompasses a diverse range of work from staffing issues, recruitment and healthcare through to a Management Development Programme.

Workforce review

  51.  The purpose of the Workforce Review was to ensure that all of the future business needs of the NIPS would be capable of being met through its workforce. The required outcome was that the workforce would be structured in such a way that the correct skills mix would be available to all operational managers at times when they are required to carry out the work. The report identified posts and work which did not require the full range of officer's duties and has been used to inform the work on future grading in strand 5.

The future provision of training

  52.  This project developed into a small programme encompassing the future requirements for training, the relocation of the Dog section and the disposal of the current PSC site. The project scoped the current and future training requirements for the service and quantified the resource requirements. A further project through Estate Management is exploring the potential planning permission and the applications necessary to maximise the potential income from disposal of the site. A response on an Outline Planning Permission (OPP) for the PSC site is not yet available.

  53.  A further project considered the relocation of the Dog section from the Millisle site. At the same time it assessed the potential to out-source the kennelling requirement to cover times of leave, and provide the training externally. This has not proved practical and, indeed, the outsourcing exercise attracted no commercial interest.

  54.  The agreement in early 2007 to relocate to an Integrated Training College at Desertcreat in conjunction with the PSNI and the Fire and Rescue Service has superseded this programme of work. All training facilities and the Dog kennelling and training section will relocate to the site. This should occur by 2012. NIPS will contribute to the College through the disposal of its current site at Millisle.

Exit package

  55.  The recruitment of Operational Support Grades will ensure that shortages in current staffing levels are filled, thus reducing overtime requirements. It will also provide for sufficient staff to meet the growing prisoner population needs, and staff new accommodation coming on stream in late 2008-09. It has been considered whether there may be limited opportunity for some staff to avail of an exit package. While the prison population continues to grow, along with the associated staffing requirements and the loss of Main Grade Officers (MGOs) through wastage, this is not on the current agenda.

Recruitment programme for support staff

  56.  This is an on-going process which supports the introduction of support grade staff, to release Prison Officers for roles requiring the full range of Prison officer duties. The Service has now completed the recruitment and training of the second tranche of Night Custody Officers (NCOs) with full deployment in late 2006. This project will have released the equivalent of over 160 Main Grade Officers (MGOs) back to front line duties.

  57.  The further development of grading structures to support the introduction of Operational Support Grades and Prisoner Custody Officers within strands 4 and 5 will lead to additional recruitment in the future. This will be particularly important in the medium term as there is a need to generate the additional staffing for new accommodation coming on stream in late 2008.

Healthcare

  58.  It was planned that lead responsibility for the provision of prisoner healthcare in Northern Ireland would transfer to the DHSSPS in April 2007. (Since 2000, the Home Office and the Department of Health in England have been working in a formal partnership to improve health services for prisoners, culminating in the transfer of commissioning responsibility for those services to the NHS).

  59.  A review of Prison Healthcare Services was completed in Northern Ireland in April 2002. The conclusions of the review very much reflected the position reported for England in The Future Organisation of Prison Health Care. The Review endorsed the existing aim for prison healthcare, "to give prisoners' access to the same quality and range of healthcare services that the general public receives" and found that there were examples of good practice in the prison service here. However, it was felt that the service required a coordinated multi-disciplinary team approach, with a large measure of delegated professional independence to team members.

  60.  NIPS does not have the range of skills or capacity to provide the wide range of services required to meet the demanding healthcare needs of its prisoner population. It therefore makes sense for the Prison Service here to follow the HM Prison Service model by making the Health Service in Northern Ireland responsible for commissioning all health care services, both primary and secondary care.

  61.  The Strategic Steering Group, consisting of senior officials from NIPS and DHSSPS met on 10 January 2006, when the Programme Initiation Document was signed off, and membership of a Programme Board was agreed. The Programme Board first met in March 2006, where agreement was reached that the Eastern Health & Social Services Board should act as a single commissioner for all three prisons until the new Health & Social Services Authority has been established. Partnership Boards were established consisting of the appropriate staff from HSS Trusts, the Eastern HSS Board and the Prisons management and staff. This group is an integral part of the programme for change and is responsible for producing the detailed plans essential for the successful introduction of the new arrangements.

  62.  The programme was targeted for an April 2007 handover and the transfer of £5.47 million took place on 1 April 2007. However, the Reform of Public Administration (RPA) and the local Assembly taking responsibility for Healthcare have delayed the full transfer.

Management development programme

  63.  A Management Development Scheme (MDS) has been developed to provide opportunities for a limited number of existing officers to be selected for development as future managers. The scheme is designed to bring on talented Officers within the organisation to a level where they can compete for future vacancies at Governor Grade. The Service is also determined to provide arrangements for the professional and managerial development of its future managers. The recruitment and selection phase was completed in early 2007, with the first course of 6 successful applicants commencing the one year training in March 2007.

New developments—additional accommodation

  64.  In response to the strands 1 and 2 reports on Prisoner Projections and the Estate Strategy in 2006, the Service has already scoped the future projections and accommodation needs for the next 10-15 years. It has also identified a medium term need, over the next 2-4 years, to provide accommodation suitable to meet the increase in prisoner numbers, and provide contingency accommodation.

  65.  This project commenced work early in 2006 and, using the National Offender Management System (NOMS) specification for Ready To Use (RTU) accommodation, is currently targeted to deliver in mid 2008. In preparation for future major build projects, NIPS is actively participating in the Office of Government (OGC) Gateway process to ensure major procurement projects are delivered on time, to cost and of the right quality.

  66.  Two new Ready To Use (RTU) accommodation blocks providing 60 cells each (including, where necessary, ancillary services) are being developed for the Maghaberry and Magilligan sites. These will provide cover whilst the larger more permanent blocks, capable of housing 240 or more inmates, are developed for delivery in 2010-11. With the delivery of these modern well designed, permanent buildings, NIPS can deliver greater efficiencies in staffing ratios, and better engagement with prisoners to assist in the prevention of re-offending. In response to the continuing increase in the prisoner population active consideration has been given to extending the Maghaberry option to 120 cells to meet the growing population needs.

  67.  The RTU accommodation will go some way to promoting lower staffing ratios and greater engagement with prisoners, assisted by association on the landings, as opposed to separate locked rooms. The engagement with prisoners will be supported by the revised security categorisation which will classify prisoners more accurately and appropriately. This accommodation will comprise some of the most modern, spacious and well equipped cell stock possessed by NIPS, with the larger cells providing in-cell sanitation and capable of doubling.

  68.  The Service has also looked at other short term options to provide adult male accommodation. An additional 50 bed dormitory type accommodation came on stream at Magilligan in October 2007. This is, however, only suitable for low risk prisoners in the later stages of their sentence.

Options appraisals

  69.  The Prisons Minister, Mr Paul Goggins, announced on 21 February 2007 that he had tasked the Prison Service "in consultation with other interested parties to provide him with a comprehensive options appraisal by the end of the summer". This work—in preparation for the announcement of the location of the replacement to the existing Magilligan prison—is to enable the Minister to take a final decision on whether to rebuild on the existing site or at another location.

  70.  The study focuses upon the replacement of Magilligan and the decision to replace at the current or an alternative site elsewhere in Northern Ireland. Any decision to locate elsewhere will impact upon the role the replacement prison will play and the category of prisoner. The study will also examine the future impact for Maghaberry, including the impact of providing additional accommodation on the Maghaberry site, and the implications and requirements for ancillary services and support facilities.

  71.  The study will examine the resource requirements for procurement of a new prison and the methodology by which this may be achieved. It will also review the method for project delivery for the options identified, and the necessary blend of skills and resources required internally and externally. This will include identifying the range and extent of external partnership and consultancy necessary to deliver the final product. The project will also deliver high level financial model costs for capital and resource for the recommended options. The project is due to report by end November 2007.

  72.  The Service has also received criticism over the location of women prisoners in Ash House, a building previously occupied by young offenders and on the young offender's site at Hydebank. It has accepted that this is not the appropriate long term location. The Minister has asked NIPS to carry out a review of the needs of women and the facilities to support this. The first phase of this project is scheduled to report by the end of February 2008. The study focuses on the options for relocation, either on the current site or, potentially, elsewhere. The study will examine the needs of women prisoners, both sentenced and remand, and, from that, identify the future shape and design of female housing, as well as devising an overall strategy. Throughout the development of this work, NIPS will work closely with all interested stakeholders. The Minister has also asked that the study should look at the potential for providing a Women's hostel in the community.

Northern Ireland Prison Service

November 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 13 December 2007