Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Written Evidence


Written evidence from the Prisoner Ombudsman for Northern Ireland

  I welcome this opportunity as Prisoner Ombudsman for Northern Ireland to comment upon the terms of reference which form the basis for the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee inquiry into the Northern Ireland Prison Service.

A.  PRISON ESTATE IN NORTHERN IRELAND

HMP Magilligan

  It is widely recognised that the structure and layout of buildings at Magilligan Prison are generally unfit for purpose. The buildings are ageing (opened 1972) and are spread over a large area.

  For example the Prison Healthcare building is particularly unsuited to modern provision of healthcare. This unit provides mostly primary care but houses a small number of inpatients. The unsuitability of this building has been brought into stark focus recently with the detection of legionella bacterium in the water supply. I am currently conducting a joint investigation with the NI Health and Safety Executive into a related prisoner death. I am advised that significant new investment is planned for this building. Whilst much needed this raises the question of whether it constitutes a good use of public funds to continue to make such ad hoc improvements however necessary to the existing estate. I think not, but would prefer a strategic approach to capital replacement with committed timescales.

Prisoner Accommodation

  The unfitness of prisoner accommodation is well established and I concur with HM Inspectorate and the Chief Inspector of Criminal Justice that the H blocks need to be replaced urgently, with integral sanitation.

  It is worrying that there is continuing uncertainty about replacement funding being identified for Magilligan Prison. The need for an early decision on this is rendered more acute by the pressures arising from the increase in the prisoner population. The Prison population has increased by around 9.5% over the last five years. The response of the Prison Service to put in place prefabricated temporary units whilst understandable also raises the issue of ad hoc measures as against strategic capital planning.

Location

  It is important that decisions on the future location for Magilligan Prison should be driven by the Prison Service strategic Objectives. Considerations of the impact upon the local economy or even upon security of employment for the workforce however important must be secondary considerations as determinants of future location.

  One of the key objectives for any Prison Service must be to prepare prisoners for reintegration to their community. Central to this is the maintenance of contact between prisoners and their families. The location of Magilligan Prison does not for many prisoners lend itself to achieving this. The burden upon families is considerable. Furthermore the opportunities for prisoners to prepare for employment is limited by the present location for many prisoners.

  The establishment of a project team by the Prison Service to develop a new estate strategy as part of the Services "Blueprint for Future Development" is welcomed. What concerns me is the issue of how long the process for replacing Magilligan may be. On a recent visit to the Irish Prison Service I was left with the impression that the authorities in that jurisdiction had found ways to move much faster in planning and effecting recent prison replacement.

  As Prisoner Ombudsman I do not function as an advocate for prisoners and my concerns about Magilligan Prison are derived from a recognition of the complex and challenging task which is set for the Service and its staff as well as from the needs of prisoners.

Hydebank Wood Prison

  The principal issue of concern with regard to the prison estate here is the location of the women's prison accommodation within a predominantly male Young Offender Centre. This impacts adversely upon the efforts of the Prison Service to deliver the Healthy Prison criteria aimed for.

  In addition the design of the women prisoners' accommodation is so influenced by traditional thinking around security and containment that much of the effort put into resettlement activity is at risk of being negated. I have been most impressed by the Dochas Centre (Dublin) which houses many of Ireland's female prisoners. The design of this centre where security considerations are much less visible facilitates the progressive prisoner regimes which I believe our Prison Service would like to achieve. The legitimate needs for safety and security have not been compromised at Dochas.

  I acknowledge that the small size of our female prisoner population poses special problems for costs through diseconomies of scale but this needs to be weighed against the impact upon families and ultimately society as well as the prisoners themselves of continuing to utilise repressive buildings.

B.  PRISON HEALTHCARE IN NORTHERN IRELAND

  I strongly support the recent transfer (April 2007) of prison healthcare provision to Health Service commissioners and providers. It is much too soon to say what specific improvements this will bring or how soon they will be realised.

  The principle of achieving equivalence of healthcare in prisons with that available in the community is established. In fact it can be argued that because prisoners necessarily lose autonomy by virtue of their new incarcerated status the duty of care of the Prison Service (rather than achieving equivalence) is often enhanced.

  I have been concerned about the inability of the Prison Service to respond appropriately to the mental health needs of prisoners and to the needs of prisoners with some chronic physical ailments. An overriding concern has been with the absence of a proper Prison Service Clinical Governance Structure for the delivery of prison healthcare. The recent transfer to the Health Service if anything increases the urgency of establishing robust clinical governance and accelerating the efforts to do so already made by the Prison Service. There is now shared responsibility for delivery of healthcare between the Prison Service and the Health Service and experience has shown that in such shared situations risk management and good governance assume much greater importance.

  The Prison Service has for the most part no choice about its service users and has a typical over-representation of poor health generally among the prisoner population. Prisoner healthcare is something we can often do something to improve during incarceration and I am strongly supportive of increased investment in this area.

  A particular concern in prisoner healthcare arises from the high numbers of prisoners who exhibit behaviours suggestive of personality disorders as opposed to psychiatric illness. The Prison Service needs greater help with such prisoners in the form of enhanced therapeutic facilities and programmes. The initiatives recently taken, eg Maghaberry Prisons efforts to intensify support to poor coping prisoners, are welcome but need to be enhanced.

Prison Healthcare—a speciality

  In addition to their poorer overall health profile prisoners present differently to the normal population for their healthcare needs. This phenomena taken together among other things with the unique culture and environment which constitutes incarceration requires all prison healthcare staff to be specially trained. This may be difficult to achieve in the short term but such "forensic" training should be energetically promoted.

  Prison staff on the ground have expressed concern about the adequacy of their training for managing prisoners with personality disorders or mental health needs. The complex mix of custodian and carer roles requires substantial investment in training.

C.  THE GENERAL OPERATION OF THE NI PRISON SERVICE

  My work as a recently appointed Prisoner Ombudsman allows me only to slowly build a picture of the Prison Service deriving from the learning inherent in complaints upon which I have made findings. The hugely challenging role required of the Prison Service is very clear to me. The service has been described correctly as being in transition. This specific transition is influenced by the wider societal transition through which Northern Ireland is now moving. Other parts of the local Criminal Justice System have been subjected to much more intensive overall scrutiny and consequently their transition has been expedited. The biggest part of the transition for the Prison Service, simply put, is from a dominant security and containment culture to one where the emphasis moves to a more balanced culture incorporating reintegrating programmes. This shift implies enhanced roles for all prison staff including greater engagement with prisoners. The existence of Separated Prisoner status undoubtedly diverts resources from a more progressive general regime. It also risks entrenchment of the old dominant prison culture. For this reason, however intractable the problem, undiminished efforts must be made to achieve normalisation in our prisoner status.

  There is an opportunity now in preparation for devolution of criminal justice to review the type of Prison Service Northern Ireland needs and wants for the future. The all too common mixture of public and media antipathy, hostility and ignorance concerning what goes on within prisons can mean that they struggle for proper recognition, support, policy and practice development and funding. The considerable strategic efforts of the current Director General and his staff could be built upon with the help of an expert independent review.

  The cost per prisoner place in Northern Ireland is over twice the cost in Great Britain. It seems to be unreasonable to expect efficiency gains whilst the Prison Service is expected to operate in inefficient estate and to cope with the need for major cultural change. A strategic approach to efficiency gains is needed as opposed to arbitrarily imposed savings requirements.

D.  EDUCATION AND TRAINING NEEDS

  I am less well informed in these areas but have become aware of the development of a range of resettlement and reintegration focussed opportunities for prisoners.

  The absence of an overall Personal Officer Scheme for prisoners in Northern Ireland Prisons is not conducive to the development of a holistic approach to prisoner resettlement planning including education and training.

  When I have referred earlier to cultural transition within the Prison Service it should be axiomatic that the provision of appropriate education and training is best facilitated by a culture which gives emphasis to re-integrative objectives. The same is true with regard to the negative impact of poor estate such as at Magilligan and Hydebank Prisons.

  Education and training for prisoners is crucial to efforts at addressing re-offending and in maintaining a positive culture for prisoners and staff alike.

SUMMARY

  I have sought to address the Committees terms of reference by focusing mainly upon the Magilligan Prison estate and the needs of women prisoners. Maghaberry Prison although relatively new, also suffers in some parts from cramped conditions eg the Vulnerable Prisoners Unit but must be a lower priority than Magilligan and Hydebank needs but is clearly unfit for purpose.

  The provision of prison healthcare in Northern Ireland has had the appearance of a long struggle to achieve and to maintain equivalence of care with the community. Some excellent work has been and is being done but the fruits of the transfer to the Health Service have yet to be seen. The care for prisoners with mental health and personality disorders requires substantial new investment.

  Finally may I, with suitable humility I hope, suggest that my own role should without delay be placed on a proper statutory footing to secure the independent powers of my Office. I provide a unique day to day scrutiny of the NI Prison Service which affords the opportunity for organisational learning through identification of service failures. My support from the Director General and his staff is welcome but my Office should not continue to be reliant upon goodwill but should be empowered in Statute. The management of complaints is described in the Review of the Criminal Justice System in Northern Ireland 2000, as an essential part of effective accountability mechanisms.

  I would welcome the opportunity to meet the Committee to expand upon my comments in the course of its inquiry. I wish you well in your endeavours.

Brian Coulter

Prisoner Ombudsman for Northern Ireland

24 April 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 13 December 2007