Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 183-199)

MR FINLAY SPRATT AND MS JUNE ROBINSON

6 JUNE 2007

  Q183 Chairman: Mr Finlay Spratt and Ms June Robinson, thank you very much indeed for coming. We are grateful to you. You have heard a bit of the previous session's evidence and you have doubtless read other evidence we have had during the course of this inquiry. You, yourself, have submitted a paper, for which we are grateful. Could I just, Mr Spratt, remind you of the specific terms of reference of our inquiry? We are conducing an inquiry into the operation of the Northern Ireland Prison Service and in particular to examine whether the existing prison estate is adequate and appropriate for the secure accommodation of Northern Ireland's prisoners, and whether the Prison Service appropriately meets the health, education and training needs of prisoners. The Committee will also examine such other issues as may arise in the course of the inquiry, but that just sets the scene. Before I bring in colleagues and ask the first question, is there any point which you yourself wish to make at the outset?

  Mr Spratt: I just want to make the point that June and I are representatives of the Prison Officers' Association in Northern Ireland. There would be many details that would go on within the Northern Ireland Prison Service that we just would not have information on and which, for obvious reasons, they would not wish to share with us as a trade union. So you may be asking us some questions, and we certainly have heard the Prison Ombudsman addressing some issues that we would not be aware of, but certainly we will be open, frank and honest and we will give you an honest opinion and you will draw your own conclusions after that.

  Q184  Chairman: We will certainly do that, and perhaps I could just start before bringing in Mr Pound. Could you tell me whether you consider yourself a rehabilitation officer?

  Mr Spratt: I believe that prisons should be there. When we send people to prison we should strive to return them to society better people, but it depends how we treat them while they are in the penal system, and I have some outrageous views on how we treat prisoners in the Northern Ireland Prison Service. I think that we are coming out of a conflict of 30 years where prison officers have not time to be prison officers, and I think there is a whole retraining programme needed in the Northern Ireland Prison Service. I think at this point in time the Prison Service has sadly failed the members who work in it and the prisoners we house. One of the bones of contention is the remission system where a prisoner is automatically granted 50% remission. Although there has been a bill passed recently to amend that, I think it is some 20 or 30 years too late. When you send a prisoner to prison he automatically knows he is getting 50% remission, so he takes the view, "Well, why should I cooperate with the system? I'm only going to do half my time." My view is that if Parliament and society wishes to support prison officers then I think when a prisoner is sentenced to prison, should that be five, ten years, then he should earn the right to be released into society. That way he will work with the prison officer, it will give the prison officer an incentive to work with him, and I think we need to sadly, right across the United Kingdom, look at the remission system and how we treat and deal with offenders.

  Q185  Chairman: So you are in favour of remission in principle, but you are against it being automatic?

  Mr Spratt: Absolutely.

  Chairman: Thank you. I think that is something with which many of us would find ourselves in sympathy. Could I bring in someone whom I know you have had the pleasure of meeting in the past and who has certainly enjoyed the pleasure of meeting you, Mr Stephen Pound.

  Q186  Stephen Pound: Thank you very much indeed, Chairman. I also wish to say it is a real pleasure to see you again, Mr Spratt, looking so well and in such good spirits.

  Mr Spratt: Yes. It is nice to see you, too.

  Q187  Stephen Pound: In some of our earlier conversations you have quite rightly made the extremely serious point about the transitionary role of your members moving from a very, very different custodial environment to the one which they currently occupy, and at that time you raised with us not just the problems off the estate faced by your members but the difficulty of recalibrating their entire working day and their working practices. You said that that was transitional and you thought at the time there could be a reduction in the cost per prisoner and possibly even a reduction in the prisoner numbers, but that training was a crucial aspect for the higher staffing ratios. Last year we were faced with a situation where the average cost per prisoner in Northern Ireland was something like three times that of Scotland and four times that of parts of England and Wales. How far are we moving towards the reduction in the annual cost per prisoner from your perspective? Are we going too fast or are we going too slowly?

  Mr Spratt: If you read the document which I sent you, that was an initiative from the Northern Ireland Prison Service because whether you like to believe it or not the POA has spent this last five to seven years trying to drag the management of the Prison Service forward into the 21st century and they keep blaming prison staff. You just have to read that document. That says it all and I fully stand by everything that is there. The problem which happened when the Maze closed was that everybody forgot we still have a Prison Service to run and they thought the prisoner population was actually going down, but as a matter of fact it was increasing. They had a golden opportunity then to address the issue and plan for the future, but instead in the meetings I had they talked about the prison population dropping, but it actually went the opposite way. In fact there was a programme round about 2002, I think, where they talked about a rebuilding programme. Somebody somewhere shelved that. That is why we are in the mess that we are in today, and we have actually got their evidence.

  Ms Robinson: Yes, in fact they talked in 2002 about possibly rebuilding Maghaberry and different, new plans for Maghaberry. They actually allowed in those plans for the prisoner population to go up to 1,500 to today, but as Finlay has just said, for some reason a decision was taken and those plans never went ahead.

  Q188  Stephen Pound: But would that affect the officer to prisoner ratio, which is one of the main reasons for the very high cost of custody in Northern Ireland?

  Mr Spratt: We are hoping that this document we have produced here will address the cost per prisoner, because in fact with the recent efficiency programme we have brought in we have cut out 10% of staffing costs. That is quite a substantial reduction of 10%, which is about 150 officers' posts which actually came in on 1 April.

  Q189  Stephen Pound: Over what period was that reduction?

  Mr Spratt: Actually, it took place on 1 April -

  Ms Robinson: 1 April this year.

  Mr Spratt: -- a reduction of staffing of 150.

  Q190  Stephen Pound: In the last financial year?

  Mr Spratt: Yes, starting from 1 April this year. We negotiated a three year pay deal with the Northern Ireland Office which actually reduced prison officers' numbers by 150 on 1 April this year, so we have strived to make a contribution to reducing the cost per prisoner place. We have also actually agreed by wide-ranging terms, in fact, a proposal to replace the court escorting service with cheaper people. That is now in and it is up and running. We have actually agreed the introduction of OSG grades, which in actual fact is half the cost of a prison officer, and if you read this document back in 2004 I went to the Northern Ireland Office and proposed then that we recruit prisoner custody officers. They advertised for them, they interviewed them and they did not recruit, and they have wasted millions of pounds of taxpayers' money paying overtime to run Maghaberry. It is in the document and I can produce it. The facts are there. It was advertised in the press. Somebody somewhere in the Prison Service management decided they would not do that and cost the taxpayer millions of pounds, but they are always very good on turning around and blaming the POA. We certainly do not take any blame for it. It is not my job or June's to manage the Northern Ireland Prison Service. Yes, we will express a view, but we do not have the authority or the power. We have certainly strived and put forward proposals to reduce the cost per prisoner place. I have to acknowledge that the present management we have are attempting to do something about it, but we wasted three years in the Northern Ireland Prison Service where management did not function, they did not consult with the POA. We basically lost three years and that is why we are in the mess we are in today.

  Q191  Chairman: How would you describe your relations with management at the moment?

  Mr Spratt: The relations with management at the moment are excellent.

  Q192  Chairman: So you have forgiven them, have you?

  Mr Spratt: No, this is a new management.

  Ms Robinson: It is a new management team.

  Mr Spratt: It is a new management team, Chairman. Yes, there are problems, do not get me wrong. There are always problems between an employer and a trade union and it would be wrong for me to say any differently! At the end of the day, yes, they are trying, but I believe they should try a lot harder. We did agree a reduction, but I have told the pay review body, and I will tell you, yes, we negotiated a pay deal. I believe management failed that pay deal because we have not the staff in place. Even though we are reduced to 130 at Maghaberry at the moment, staff cannot get leave, prisoners are locked up during the association period, shift patterns were not properly designed and it is a total and complete mess. In fact we are going back to another meeting in Maghaberry on Monday. We had a meeting a month ago. I had proposals to resolve it and every time everybody says, no, I am talking through my head. I have to say I have been 31 years in the Prison Service and if I do not know my job by this time, well, then I think there is something wrong.

  Q193  Lady Hermon: Could I just ask, in the light of the point you have just made, Mr Spratt, which we have listened to very attentively, how would you describe morale within the Prison Service, within your membership?

  Mr Spratt: Morale within the Prison Service at this point in time, because of the new efficiency package which we brought in, it would be fair to say is very low, and it is very low from the fact that people prior to the present management should have made decisions. They did not make them, so there is a backlog, Lady Hermon, and we do not have enough staff. When we brought in the efficiency package we were something like 180 staff short, but we reduced that by 100, so we are still staff short. Therefore, morale at the moment—because obviously there are new shift patterns which had to come in, but I believe there is only one establishment across the whole estate which actually managed it properly and that is Magilligan. There is not a problem with the new shift pattern. The local POA at Maghaberry did their best, but unfortunately there is a shortage of staff and morale at the location at the moment is very low.

  Ms Robinson: Lady Hermon, could I add something about morale. The Prison Service Headquarters themselves recently did a staff survey. They were disappointed with the uptake on that survey, but I think it is interesting to note when you talk about morale that about 29% of staff had very little confidence in senior management. I think it was 29%.

  Q194  Sammy Wilson: Could I just ask one follow up question to that? You have mentioned the efficiency measures, which have been supported, the per prisoner cost, et cetera. Do you see any further scope, because there still is a huge discrepancy on the cost per prisoner, for efficiencies in terms of new staffing arrangements which might help reduce the cost any further, Mr Spratt?

  Mr Spratt: Yes, Mr Wilson. We have actually proposed in our document here for them to introduce OSGs (Operational Support Grades) and as prison officers retire we would hope to replace them with OSGs, in fact we are hoping to recruit OSGs in discussions with the Northern Ireland Office, in fact we have a meeting next week about it and we will ask them to introduce OSGs between now and Christmas. So over a period of time, I believe there is hope, but what is needed in the Northern Ireland Prison Service is a whole re-training programme and changing people's minds, because do not forget that prison officers have worked for 30 years in a bunker-like state of affairs and you have got to convince people that we are in a different world now, and that is not easy. I believe, yes, over a period of time there is room to do this because, let us be honest about it, we have to, there is no question about it. I am a trades union leader, but I have to face reality. We have to reduce the cost per prisoner place, and I think by management in the POA—and we have demonstrated it with the three year pay deal—we can work together, and I believe we will work together. I believe over a period of time with the introduction of these grades we will reduce the cost per prisoner place. It will not happen overnight, but I think we are on the way to attacking it.

  Q195  Mr Fraser: Mr Spratt, going back to the point you just made about morale and the issues to do with prison conditions, can I just refer to something which the Committee has been told by Robin Masefield? He has said that one of the problems facing the NIPS was a "largely static workforce steeped in the past." What do you say to that?

  Mr Spratt: That is the point that I made. Prison officers have come through. For 35 years they lived in bunkers. We have got to convince them. Yes, I would acknowledge the point that Robin is making. For example, we are all aware of the stealing of information in terms of prison officers a few years ago with Stormont which brought down the Northern Ireland Executive. That had a major impact. Even today prison officers are losing all those security measures. That is a decision made by the Chief Constable. We are no longer under threat. That has had a tremendous impact on prison officers. You try and convince them that that threat is not there. You have got to convince their families. People may not believe it, but over the 30 years prison officers and their families were the forgotten members of the security services in Northern Ireland. We got absolutely nothing, and you have got to convince people. If you tell prison officers in Northern Ireland, "A prison officer in England will look after, say, 60 prisoners. Why do you need four officers in Northern Ireland?" because that is the culture that they have been brought up in.

  Q196  Mr Fraser: One of the interim solutions regarding the population growth is the new ready-to-use accommodation blocks. Is this a solution or a way of moving forward that you would be comfortable with, and how can that be improved upon?

  Mr Spratt: Yes, I think the accommodation that we have in Northern Ireland is very staff-intensive. H-Blocks and that type of accommodation takes a lot of staff to man it because there are so many different hiding areas and I think new accommodation, properly designed in a more open way will actually reduce the staffing levels, so that will in turn reduce the cost per prisoner place. Our accommodation is so outdated and it has not kept up with modern designs. The new RTU units which they are going to build at Magilligan and Maghaberry are in actual fact starting to address that issue. I do not think spending £50 million to build a new prison at Ballymena is the answer.

  Q197  Mr Fraser: Accepting the points which Anne Owers has pointed out to us, where she described Magilligan in terms of her inspection as unsafe and unsanitary, you would agree with those points?

  Ms Robinson: Yes, there is a lot of work which needs to be done at Magilligan, but I think management has to take the blame for that. Magilligan was really left and it was neglected for quite some years. Now there is a lot of talk about building a new prison on a green field site, which we would be totally, totally against.

  Q198  Mr Fraser: Can you go into more detail about why you are against that?

  Ms Robinson: To start with, we have about 450 members who work in Magilligan Prison. It provides a lot of economic benefits to that area, Limavady, Coleraine, that area. There is a good atmosphere there. You even find a lot of our members, when they are working at Maghaberry, may be transferred to Magilligan. There is a good staff atmosphere and we just think it would be a total waste of taxpayers' money just to ignore that, for whatever reason. We just do not see any benefits, economic or otherwise.

  Q199  Mr Fraser: If you are in a position where you are developing an existing site that would have existing prisons, as they are at the moment, and moving into a new regime of new buildings, that is going to have an enormous impact in the short-term on the prison officers and the way they work?

  Ms Robinson: Yes.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 13 December 2007