Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60-79)

OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT COMMERCE & DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS

18 JUNE 2007

  Q60  Mr Wright: If DEFRA is on track to do a lot, and given that this has gone up the political agenda—the Prime Minister, the Chancellor and the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs are on board—why do you not have the authority to say to your colleagues at Permanent-Secretary level, "Look, this is what we have achieved. Why have you not done the same?"

  Helen Ghosh: But that is exactly what we are doing through the Prime Minister's targets.

  Q61  Mr Wright: But you are not.

  Helen Ghosh: Yes we are. I am sorry, but going forward, the targets for sustainable operations in Government are being monitored by the SDC. I can assure you that this time next year there will be a Report that will name and shame Departments. It is being overseen by a Ministerial Committee chaired by David Miliband who is nagging me at every weekly business meeting that we have. He says, "How are we getting on with one-planet DEFRA?" He is extremely conscious of that, as are his ministerial colleagues. That is a much more powerful way in which to get Departments to achieve the Prime Minister's targets than my having direct intervention and saying, "Change your water system! Change your energy system!" But then we are providing Departments effectively with an undeniable opportunity to buy into the most sustainably defensible options through common contracts.

  Peter Fanning: Through common contracts. But before I mention that I should point out that it takes two to three years to procure a construction or facilities management contract. Typically, it takes four to five years to deliver the whole cycle because normally you are moving people around and, therefore, this work, done originally in 2005-06, included projects initiated four years earlier and those that were started, but will not come to fruition for four years. At the moment, whatever we do, we are taking a snapshot. The key thing to do is to ensure that we have comprehensive information so that we can account back to you and demonstrate a trend. This demonstrates that there are successes and failures, which is a good baseline from which to develop that trend.

  Q62  Mr Dunne: Mrs Ghosh, I refer you to paragraph 1.9 on page 10. Do you accept that the Government set a target for the Government office estate to be carbon neutral by 2012?

  Helen Ghosh: I do.

  Q63  Mr Dunne: Who is responsible for delivering on that commitment?

  Helen Ghosh: Individual Permanent Secretaries are responsible for achieving that within their estates. They are overseen by the SDC as the watchdog, Ministerial Committees and Gus O'Donnell as the leader of the group of Permanent Secretaries.

  Q64  Mr Dunne: Does that mean that ultimately Gus O'Donnell is responsible for delivering on the target?

  Helen Ghosh: Yes. I am happy to say that that outcome is not in my performance target. Every individual Permanent Secretary has it as one of their targets.

  Q65  Mr Dunne: Who is responsible for measuring progress towards achieving that target?

  Helen Ghosh: That will be done partly through Peter's systems and the property—I cannot remember what it is called.

  Peter Fanning: The property benchmarking system.

  Helen Ghosh: Yes. We will try to get accurate data. You are quite right—it was a very good point. Getting accurate data is tricky. Peter will say more about that. The SDC will say whether we have done it or not. However, there will be an interesting mixture of energy efficiency and offsetting.

  Q66  Mr Dunne: What progress has been made towards achieving that target so far?

  Helen Ghosh: I cannot tot that up mentally sitting in front of you, but the carbon reductions or increases have been set out in the SDC Report. Clearly, the first measure against that target, which was set for us last year only, will be in the SDC Report next year. That will be our first serious statistical crack at that. But you are getting information alongside that, Peter.

  Peter Fanning: We are getting information. We are working with the SDC to be the common source of information to the SDC to hold the Government to account.

  Q67  Mr Dunne: Mr Fanning, I think that you just told us that in many cases it takes four to five years to be able to turn round some buildings of this type.

  Peter Fanning: Yes.

  Q68  Mr Dunne: Given that you have only five years left in which to achieve carbon neutrality, you have no hope of doing so, have you?

  Helen Ghosh: Carbon neutrality does not mean zero carbon. Sorry—the terminology in the area is tricky. It does not mean that there will be zero carbon emissions; it means that there will be carbon neutrality as a mixture of carbon emissions and carbon offsetting to the standards that we shall set after our current consultation. We shall aim to reduce our energy use as far as possible, and to reduce carbon emissions more generally, but we cannot set bounds.

  Q69  Mr Dunne: Are you saying that if you cannot achieve it within the buildings, you will pay for it by buying carbon offset?

  Helen Ghosh: Absolutely. That is what carbon neutrality means. It is what it means for us and for M&S.

  Q70  Mr Dunne: Right. What is the current cost of carbon offset across Government?

  Helen Ghosh: I can send the Committee a note on that. The most prominent official system of carbon offset—possibly the only current one—is the carbon system for flights, of which all Departments are members. I shall send you the cost of that.[3]


  Q71  Mr Dunne: I would appreciate that. Is there a budget for carbon offsetting across Government?

  Helen Ghosh: There is an agreed budget.

  Q72  Mr Dunne: Could you provide details of it, rather than going into it now?

  Helen Ghosh: Yes. There are agreed contributions, and there is a table that shows the contributions of each Department to my Department; that is effectively how it works.

  Q73  Mr Dunne: Thank you. Is there also a budget for energy efficiency measures across Government that shows the amount of money to be set aside by Government in promoting energy efficiency in Government buildings?

  Helen Ghosh: There are schemes in the wider public sector, of which Salix is an example.

  Q74  Mr Dunne: We are talking specifically about the Government office estate.

  Helen Ghosh: I am not aware of any specific fund for that.

  Q75  Mr Dunne: If there is no budget and if there is limited funding to purchase carbon offset at present, how can you assess whether you have any prospect of achieving carbon neutrality by 2012?

  Helen Ghosh: Carbon neutrality by 2012 was explicitly set by Ministers as a challenging but achievable target that was very much in line with similar targets in the private sector.

  Q76  Mr Dunne: But are they asking you to achieve that with no funding?

  Helen Ghosh: Apart from the pretty substantial funding streams that already go into management of our estates.

  Q77  Mr Dunne: Indeed, but we have already heard that £3 billion is going into that for refurbishment.

  Helen Ghosh: Yes.

  Peter Fanning: Yes.

  Q78  Mr Dunne: Mr Fanning, you just told us that that money will take four to five years to feed through to individual projects.

  Peter Fanning: It could do, yes.

  Q79  Mr Dunne: I do not know the size of the total Government estate. Did you mention 9,000 buildings?

  Peter Fanning: It is about 9,000 holdings.


3   Ev 13 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 15 January 2008