Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 80-99)

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY

27 JUNE 2007

  Q80  Mr Bacon: Presumably the two, that chart on the bottom right-hand corner and this, should add up to £483 million, because that is what the Report says, should they not?

  Dr King: There are other sources of income.

  Q81  Mr Bacon: You sent a document to the regional flood defence committees recently in which you said, and I quote, "Our planning assumption is that our resource settlement over the next three years will be flat cash in line with our current 2007-08 baseline (a real-time reduction in funding) with any growth limited to capital investment". Is that still your planning assumption?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: It is indeed our planning assumption until such time as we get an outcome from the Comprehensive Spending Review.

  Q82  Mr Bacon: So you are hoping and expecting that you will do well out of the Comprehensive Spending Review, but until such time, that is your planning assumption.

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: We felt it was the safest assumption to go forward with.

  Q83  Mr Bacon: So your budget now is what, £500 million?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: Yes; or thereabouts.

  Q84  Mr Bacon: When the secretary of state yesterday, at column 166, said that it was £615 million. What was he referring to?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: I suspect he was referring to expenditure on flood risk management and on coastal management which currently is funded with local authorities.

  Q85  Mr Bacon: Just through local authorities?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: Yes and I suspect there may well be some funding in that amount for some central Defra functions as well. I am not entirely sure what he was quoting there. We can certainly try to rationalise that for you.

  Q86  Mr Bacon: If there are various sources of funding, a clear note that sets out in a chart where they all come from and what they all add up to so we know what we are talking about. Could you also, within that, specify capital expenditure, maintenance expenditure and new expenditure and do it for each of the last five years and what your planning assumptions are going forward?[8] That would be great. Could I ask about the administrative cost of £64 million, which it says is 14% of the total? 14% sounds quite high. Can you briefly say what administrative costs cover?[9]

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: Administrative costs cover a number of functions both nationally and regionally. At the regional level they cover regional and area support staff, human resources, finance, legal facilities, accommodation, with costs of supporting our flood risk management committees, which are the not quite democratic but para-democratic process, and support services. At national level they cover our flood risk management policy and process costs, our computing costs, overheads of our head office and also national centres as well as our national corporate costs of running a board and paying me and things like that.

  Q87  Mr Bacon: Which obviously adds considerably to the total cost!

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: Absolutely; hugely!

  Q88  Mr Bacon: Can you just remind us what the total number of staff employed by the Agency is?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: It is just under 13,000 at the moment.

  Q89  Mr Bacon: How many of those work in the HR department?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: We have recently benchmarked our HR function and it benchmarked very well against external benchmarks.

  Q90  Mr Bacon: Do you know how many?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: About 200 I think.

  Q91  Mr Bacon: I just have a figure in my mind that the Immigration and Nationality Directorate with 14,000 staff employed 540 in HR, so if you are on 200, you are doing quite well.

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: We compare very well with external commercial benchmarks.

  Q92  Mr Bacon: Is it possible you could send us a note with a detailed breakdown of the costs you have just been describing, the administrative costs?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: Yes, indeed.

  Q93  Mr Bacon: That would be very helpful. Could I ask you to turn to page 5 where it describes in paragraph 4 and I quote "The Agency has not met its target to maintain 63 % of flood defence systems in target condition"? Could you just briefly explain what is "target condition"? What is meant by the phrase "target condition"?

  Mr Kersley: We assess a preferred condition that we would like our assets to be at and that is informed by our science R&D programme that basically finds the optimum point between the costs of maintaining the fabric condition of an asset and the risk of its failure.

  Q94  Mr Bacon: So "target condition" means optimum condition, preferred condition?

  Mr Kersley: Yes.

  Q95  Mr Bacon: But your target is not to have all your assets in their target condition, it is only to have a percentage, in this case 63% of your assets, in their target condition. That is right, is it not?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: Our target is a progressive one in that over successive years we would aim for a higher target.

  Q96  Mr Bacon: Presumably, if it is your preferred optimum condition, you would aim for 100%, would you not?

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: We would aim for 100%.

  Q97  Mr Bacon: Budgetary restrictions stop you.

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: Our estimate is that in order to be able to break the backlog of poor condition, and we do have a backlog of poor condition which we have inherited, we would need £150 million a year to do so. We do not think it is realistic to set a 100% target at a time when we are not likely to have a hope in hell of completing it.

  Q98  Mr Bacon: So your estimate is that you want £150 million extra a year, but you did say in answer to an earlier question that you have not asked for an extra £150 million a year yet.

  Baroness Young of Old Scone: We have asked for a settlement under the Spending Review which is primarily focused on capital but inevitably in our allocation we look at what is the most cost-effective investment strategy and increasingly, as we know our assets better and we have a better asset management process, we can take a judgment as to whether we get a better bang for our buck from a maintenance investment or a capital investment.

  Q99  Mr Bacon: A couple of weeks ago when the Committee visited a couple of Environment Agency assets, the people showing us around talked about temporary and demountable barriers. In paragraph 3.14 there is reference to that in various places including in Worcester where barriers were purchased. I remember reading some years ago how delighted the folk of Worcester were that they were to get these temporary barriers. How much does it cost in the case of a city like Worcester to get temporary barriers set up and available or demountable, whichever they are, available? Do you know what was spent in that case? Do you have a rough idea?

  Dr King: We do have the figures, though I am not sure whether we have them here. It is important to differentiate between demountable barriers and temporary barriers. Demountable barriers are highly engineered aluminium structures.


8   Ev 23-24 Back

9   Ev 24-25 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 18 December 2007