Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questins 120-128)

CABINET OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HM PRISON SERVICE

12 DECEMBER 2007

  Q120  Mr Bacon: When do you think it will be solved?

  Ms Diggle: I would have to look into that for you, I am afraid.[4]

  Q121  Mr Bacon: Will you write to us?

  Ms Diggle: Certainly.

  Q122  Chairman: I have one last question for you, Mr Coates, in figure 12 on page 22, it says at the bottom of the second paragraph that 65% of invoices in Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust are backed by a purchase order (PO) compared with an average of 30% for all Shared Business Services customers. It is pretty devastating that only 30% of those invoices are backed by a purchase order, is it not?

  Mr Coates: It does demonstrate poor management of the way a trust goes about issuing orders to its contractors, yes.

  Q123  Chairman: It is more than poor management. As I understand the way the public sector works, you have a purchase order and then you know you have an invoice, it makes sense, does it not?

  Mr Coates: I agree that—

  Q124  Chairman: It is staggering that only 30% are backed by one.

  Mr Coates: I agree but hospitals work in certain ways and there is little chance of mistakes or fraud because ultimately the PO is raised retrospectively rather than prospectively. In other words, once the order has been placed, the orderer has to then raise the matching PO, so it is a management issue rather than a process issue or a fraud issue.

  Q125  Mr Bacon: Why does the NHS employ 300 people in the NHS Counter-fraud Security Agency if there is little risk of fraud?

  Mr Coates: On this particular issue I was talking about, not generally.

  Q126  Chairman: Does this answer stack up? Can I ask the National Audit Office, is this right that because of the way the NHS works that it does not really matter that only 30% of invoices are backed by a purchase order? That is what we have just been told.

  Sir John Bourn: Basically of course it does matter because there would be no point in having both of them to compare unless it served a purpose. But of course, as Mr Coates says, you find different systems occurring in different lines of activity. The whole question is whether you find something which is different and prima facie surprising, is it justifiable or does it need correction?

  Q127  Chairman: Do you think it needs correction, Mr Coates?

  Mr Coates: I think good practice would dictate that the numbers should be the other way round, yes.

  Q128  Chairman: So does it need correction?

  Mr Coates: We are trying to correct it by bringing in electronic invoicing to prevent POs being raised retrospectively.

  Chairman: Thank you, lady and gentlemen, for your attendance and let us hope you find £7 billion. Thank you very much.





4   Ev 20 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 8 May 2008