Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1-19)

MR DAVE HARTNETT CB AND MR NICK LODGE

17 DECEMBER 2007

  Q1 Chairman: Good afternoon. Welcome to the Committee of Public Accounts where today we are considering the loss of child benefit data by HM Revenue & Customs. We welcome Dave Hartnett, who is Acting Chairman of HM Revenue & Customs. Could you introduce your colleague please, Mr Hartnett?

  Mr Hartnett: Yes, Chairman, and good afternoon. To my left is Nick Lodge, who is our Director of Data Security, recently appointed.

  Q2  Chairman: What day were you appointed, Mr Lodge?

  Mr Lodge: 21 November.

  Q3  Chairman: So this was after the statement to the House about the loss of this data?

  Mr Lodge: Yes.

  Q4  Chairman: Did you have a predecessor who was responsible at the time of this incident?

  Mr Lodge: I did not have a direct predecessor, no.

  Q5  Chairman: Why not?

  Mr Lodge: There was no direct predecessor in that post. It was a new post created.

  Q6  Chairman: Why not? Why was there no person in HMRC in overall charge of data security before this incident? Why did this incident have to take place with the loss of the details of 25 million people before you appointed a head of data security?

  Mr Hartnett: Chairman, I will take this if I may. There was no single person responsible and that is one of the issues that Mr Poynter brings out and that we have recognised. When I became Acting Chairman, I felt a need for a director in that position immediately, and it was one of a number of steps I took on assuming my role.

  Q7  Chairman: Is Mr Lodge at board level?

  Mr Hartnett: No.

  Q8  Chairman: Who is responsible at board level?

  Mr Hartnett: I think a number of people are responsible at board level and that has been one of the lessons we have learned. There are three or four different people—the Director General for Compliance, because it was his people who were involved in managing disks; our CIO; and the Director General responsible for benefits.

  Q9  Chairman: You do not think it is sufficiently important to have a single person at board level?

  Mr Hartnett: Chairman I do, and that is why I have appointed one.

  Q10  Chairman: But Mr Lodge is not on the board.

  Mr Hartnett: I am sorry, Mr Lodge reports to me.

  Q11  Chairman: Right, thank you. Who was the senior manager responsible then at the time who would have been responsible for ensuring that procedures were followed correctly? Who would that have been?

  Mr Hartnett: Had the process owner for child benefit been fully involved in this he would have been the senior manager responsible.

  Q12  Chairman: And the process owner for child benefit was not consulted?

  Mr Hartnett: The process owner for child benefit does not seem to have been fully consulted. He features in one email I have seen from March and features in a couple of emails in October.

  Q13  Chairman: Is this Mr Nigel Jordan?

  Mr Hartnett: That is Mr Jordan.

  Q14  Chairman: He figures in the email on 13 March; it was copied to him?

  Mr Hartnett: He does figure in that email.

  Q15  Chairman: This incident took place some time ago, presumably you have had a chance to talk to Mr Jordan about what happened, have you?

  Mr Hartnett: No. As soon as the police and other agencies became involved the HMRC enquiries stopped. I gather that one or two of my colleagues have spoken to Mr Jordan.

  Q16  Chairman: Presumably you have been briefed about that?

  Mr Hartnett: I have been briefed.

  Q17  Chairman: So when Mr Jordan was copied in on this email of 13 March, this was an email, was it not, where the National Audit Office requested this information but said they did not want to have all of the personal bank details. That is right, is it not?

  Mr Hartnett: He was copied into those emails but, Chairman, at that stage—

  Q18  Chairman: Having been copied in, what did he do with that information?

  Mr Hartnett: Mr Jordan was not available, as I understand it, when the email was sent to him. What is important here is that at the time Mr Jordan was copied in there was no suggestion that I have seen or my colleagues have seen that this data was to be removed from Waterview Park where the NAO were working on it.

  Q19  Chairman: We have this email and we can consult it, can we not; it is in our bundle here.

  Mr Hartnett: Yes you do.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 21 November 2008