Select Committee on Public Accounts Eighth Report


Conclusions and recommendations

TAX CREDITS

1.  The Department has overpaid £6 billion in tax credits in the first three years of the scheme. By the end of March 2007 the Department had collected £2 billion, written off £0.7 billion and made provisions for a further £1.6 billion of overpayments it is unlikely to recover. Overpayments currently affect 1.9 million families a year, significantly greater than the estimate of 750,000 when the scheme was designed. The policy changes to reduce overpayments included in the 2005 Pre-Budget Report have yet to take full effect. The Department should report on their actual cost and effect in terms which show whether they meet their objective of reducing overpayments by one third.

2.  Claimants may not understand why they have to make repayments, especially where they find themselves owing money to the Department where they were not previously in debt. Some regret ever getting involved with the scheme. The Department is looking to introduce more flexibility into the system to allow it to deal with certain categories of claimant more effectively. It needs to explain clearly in its award notices how the scheme works and how overpayments may arise.

3.  The Department has yet to succeed in clarifying its procedures for recovering overpayments. The Department has not sought to recover overpayments where it has made a mistake and the claimant could reasonably have thought the payment was right, but has had to make difficult judgements about what claimants could be expected to know. In 2006-07, 371,000 households disputed the recovery of overpayments, of which some 10,000 resulted in write-off. The Department needs to devise and implement a more objective test for assessing when tax credits claimants could reasonably have known they were overpaid.

4.  The Department has made a series of changes to the tax credits computer system, but software errors continue to affect some payments and it still has to fallback on manually processing certain awards. The Department accepts that the computer system is fragile which makes it very difficult to improve processing. The Department needs to strengthen its computer systems to make them more capable of supporting desired changes to processing.

5.  In 2006-07 the Ombudsman reviewed 393 complaints about tax credits, of which 74% were fully upheld or partially upheld. The proportion of complaints upheld on tax credits is higher than for any other department investigated by the Ombudsman. It is unsatisfactory that so many people have to pursue their complaint through the Ombudsman, having exhausted the Department's own complaints procedures. The Department needs to determine why such a high proportion of complaints to the Ombudsman are upheld and reassess its own procedures.

6.  Levels of claimant error and fraud remain unacceptably high, and the Department is still losing £1 billion each year. The Department has accepted the Committee's previous recommendations on the need to set targets for reducing error and fraud, but says it cannot set a target until 2008 when it will hold two years of good data. The Department should not have taken five years to get these targets in place. When setting these targets, it should also determine the additional resources required to achieve the target reduction in error and fraud.

7.  The Department accepts changes in income and circumstances notified to it by claimants, so erroneous or fraudulent disclosures may only be detected by post payment checking and may go undetected altogether. The Department needs to assess in detail the risks of claimant error and fraud and establish whether the responses it currently has in place are sufficient to achieve its target reduction in error and fraud.

THE DEPARTMENT'S SETTLEMENT WITH EDS

8.  In settling its claim against its contractor EDS for the problems encountered in implementing the tax credit system, the Department agreed that £26.5 million of the settlement could be paid in instalments reflecting new government business won by EDS. The Department has recovered little of the £26.5 million and may not obtain payment of full settlement by the end of 2008. We have previously criticised the invidious arrangement that requires the Government to commission further work from the contractor in order to recover compensation for underperformance. The Department needs to work with EDS to accelerate the rate of payments, and should consider litigation if the full amount of the settlement is not forthcoming in 2008.

THE TAXATION OF SMALL PENSIONS

9.  The Department is failing to collect an estimated £135 million income tax on certain small pensions each year because of incorrect guidance and failures by local HMRC offices to implement agreed procedures. The Department's steps to regularise this position mean that some pensioners will have an additional and unexpected tax liability notified to them in 2008-09. The Department needs to alert pensioners to the possibility that their tax liability may change and provide them with longer periods of time to settle any additional tax liability that would affect their ability to pay.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 5 February 2008