Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 20-39)

HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS

10 OCTOBER 2007

  Q20  Mr Touhig: So we were right to say you were actually pay now check later.

  Mr Gray: Sorry, can I just finish? In relation to the way Tax Credits operate, as I think you are aware, Mr Touhig, this is an annual system. The precise entitlement at the end of the year depends on the claimant's overall income over the course of that year and any change of circumstances that they encounter, so there is a potential difference between us paying the right amount of money at the point of claim in relation to the information that we then have available, and the eventual entitlement after the end of the year which, in accordance with the Act—

  Q21  Mr Touhig: I understand the point you are making, so that verification check is nothing really, is it, it does not mean anything?

  Mr Gray: It does mean something. What it does mean is that if there is any evidence of fraud at the point of claim then we are making checks to seek to ensure we are not paying out inappropriately.

  Q22  Mr Touhig: If that is a bit belt and braces it still has not stopped you overpaying £6.6 billion; you need to pull your socks up a bit.

  Mr Gray: For the reason that I have sought to explain, as was indicated at the introduction of the system, because of the Government's wish to have a very flexible system that responded to people's changing circumstances it was anticipated that there would be very significant overpayments.

  Q23  Mr Touhig: Do you understand the misery that you cause people when—I believe because of errors on your part—you then seek to recover money?

  Mr Gray: I seek to understand their position. I am not a tax credit recipient myself.

  Q24  Mr Touhig: Do any of your family receive Tax Credits?

  Mr Gray: They do not.

  Q25  Mr Touhig: Any friends?

  Mr Gray: Some other members of my family do.

  Q26  Mr Touhig: So you do have some knowledge and experience.

  Mr Gray: I have some knowledge.

  Q27  Mr Touhig: If they come and tap on your door and say: "Hey, you know, your office has really mucked up my tax credit", you are face-to-face as we face people daily with these problems.

  Mr Gray: I seek to understand that and, as you know, I very deliberately personally involve myself in a large number of the cases that you and other colleagues write to me about, so I seek to understand the position. What we are aiming to do is to operate the recovery of overpayments in the way in which the whole system was designed; I accept, as I said to Mr Williams, that in a proportion—I believe it is quite a small proportion—of cases we have not operated this in the past as effectively as we should have done.

  Q28  Mr Williams: There is no doubt, there is no doubt.

  Mr Gray: We have progressively introduced changes to improve it, I am committed—

  Q29  Mr Touhig: We have produced several Reports and you have not really made a lot of progress since we were producing these Reports. Mr Gray, the average income of in-work families receiving tax credit is £22,000 a year; 48% of those actually get £20,000 or less. Looking at your department's accounts, I see that you have substantially more as your income, £165,000-£170,000 a year, additional benefits in kind of £33,900. Families who face having their Tax Credits cut because of some problem which I believe is your fault can have up to 30% of their income cut in a week; how do you think you would feel if somebody cut your income by 30% in a week?

  Mr Gray: The point you have just made is the point I was seeking to address just now, that I seek to understand the position of people in that situation. What we are doing through this system is supplementing people's income; if people's circumstances have changed such that their entitlement to Tax Credits, in accordance with the parameters of the system which Parliament laid down, has changed, then it is appropriate for me within those parameters to make an adjustment to the net amount of additional income that we are putting into that household.

  Q30  Mr Touhig: You said earlier that you did not think the Parliamentary Ombudsman had a great many cases—I am paraphrasing what you said.

  Mr Gray: That is not quite what I said.

  Q31  Mr Touhig: I have seen the report that Mrs Ann Abraham produced, she says Tax Credits represent 26% of all the cases she handles.

  Mr Gray: Yes, and that is too high a proportion and I am interested—

  Q32  Mr Touhig: You are telling me it is too high.

  Mr Gray: —in seeing it coming down.

  Q33  Mr Touhig: One key area of complaint, she says, is the unreasonable recovery of payment system that you have got; you make people's lives a misery; you harass them, you harangue them and you make them almost desperate.

  Mr Gray: I am not sure those are quite the words that she used.

  Q34  Mr Touhig: No, those are my words, that is what happens when people come to see me when we cannot get any sense or any positive response out of your office.

  Mr Gray: I said just now I am committed to introducing further improvements in the way in which we do this. The particular issue that I know has troubled some of your constituents and others is the operation of what we have termed the reasonable belief test which we apply as to whether or not we think people should repay overpayments to us. The former Paymaster General announced to the House in June that we were going to have another look at the definition of that test and to seek to make it rather more objective, less reliant on, inevitably, difficult judgments about what people could reasonably believe. Following the consultation that is nearly completed on this exercise, we will be introducing a revised approach to that test where we will move away from reliance on judgments of reasonable belief and we will be much more explicit in setting out a contract of responsibility in which we will be very transparent about the things we believe it is appropriate for claimants to check, but equally we will be very explicit about the side of the contract that we need to live up to, and in particular one change we will be making in that is we will impose a maximum of 30 days. We are still considering whether it should be a smaller period than that in which case, if we have been given revised information by a claimant and we have failed to act on it, we will accept the responsibility is ours and we will not pursue the overpayment in those circumstances.

  Q35  Mr Touhig: In Accountancy Age on 8 March it said of you that you were a popular figure. Advisers like your open manner and your willingness to solve problems. I have asked you to come to Wales to meet some of my constituents; will you come? I will pay your fare.

  Mr Gray: I think I could even manage to pay it myself.

  Q36  Mr Touhig: You might even manage to pay it yourself.

  Mr Gray: Given the things you commented on earlier. I certainly make it a practice to be out and about in the country very regularly; I am very keen, as I do on those occasions, both to meet members of my staff and the people we are seeking to serve.

  Q37  Mr Touhig: So you will come.

  Mr Gray: If you are offering me an invitation, Mr Touhig.

  Q38  Mr Touhig: I wrote to you; I have not had a reply, so I will take it now that you will come. I have got one or two witnesses now.

  Q39  Mr Williams: You could go on a Celtic tour.

  Mr Gray: Is this going to be a kind of joint Welsh invitation?

  Mr Touhig: Yes, you will find it very polite.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 5 February 2008