Select Committee on Public Accounts Tenth Report


Around 28,000 full-time and 87,000 part-time students who started first-degree courses in 2004-05 were no longer in higher education a year later. Among the full-time students, 91.6% entered a second year of study, and 78.1% were expected to complete. There has been little improvement in retention since 2001-02, though participation in higher education has increased from around 40% to nearly 43% of 18-30 year olds. To help improve retention and participation, over the last five years universities (for this report, 'universities' means all higher education institutions) have received around £800 million as part of their teaching funding to help retain students who are the most likely to withdraw early.

The Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (the Department) has overall responsibility for public spending on higher education in England. The Higher Education Funding Council for England (the Funding Council) promotes and funds teaching and some research to help the higher education sector meet the diverse needs of students, the economy and society.

The Committee reported on widening participation and improving retention in higher education in 2002.[1] It concluded there was a need for improvement in several areas relating to student retention: reducing the wide variation in universities' retention rates; funding to support students from low-income backgrounds; tackling skills gaps; supporting students with disabilities; and information for potential students. The National Audit Office has examined the progress in improving retention since 2002.

In 2004-05, the performance gap on retention rates between universities remained as wide as it was in 2002. Five universities achieved a continuation rate in excess of 97% for full-time, first-degree students, whereas 12 had continuation rates below 87%. Because of difficulties in interpreting data there are no indicators for part-time students, though there are increasing numbers of such students, only half of whom obtain a qualification within six years. Published performance indicators for universities can provide an incentive to perform well because they affect universities' reputations and their ability to recruit students.

There is much that universities can do to improve retention. They need good quality management information including on the reasons for leaving. They can provide additional academic support for students, for example for those struggling with the mathematical elements of their course. Student access to tutors who can provide pastoral and academic support is important, especially as the numbers of students entering higher education institutions increases.

On the basis of the report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG),[2] the Committee took evidence from the Department and the Funding Council on their role in improving retention, progress by universities and at a national level, and variations in the retention of different groups of students.

1   Committee of Public Accounts, Fifty-eighth Report of Session 2001-02, Improving Student Achievement and Widening Participation in Higher Education in England, HC 588 Back

2   C&AG's Report, Staying the Course: The retention of students in higher education, HC (2006-07) 616 Back

previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 20 February 2008