Select Committee on Public Accounts Twenty-Eighth Report


Conclusions and recommendations

1.  Take-up of digital television has exceeded the Departments' expectations and, so far, the switchover timetable is on track. The programme has benefited from strong working relationships between Government and those in the broadcasting industry responsible for its implementation. However, the programme still has four more years left to run. There are still 3.75 million households which do not have digital television and 26 million unconverted analogue television sets. These sets will not be able to display broadcast television after switchover if they have not been converted to receive digital signals.

2.  The Government's decision to use licence fee money to pay for the digital switchover removed over £800 million from Parliament's regular processes governing the allocation and use of public money. The effect has been to weaken public accountability as the Comptroller and Auditor General can only report on the BBC's use of the sums ring-fenced in the licence fee settlement at the invitation of the BBC Trust.

3.  In passing responsibility for procuring and delivering the help scheme and information campaign to the BBC, the Departments did not take adequate safeguards to secure value for money. Using the licence fee and partnerships with the BBC and industry to deliver switchover makes sense, given the Departments' limited delivery capacity and experience. However, in doing so they did not:

  • specify the outcomes they required;
  • ensure that the targets set by the BBC and Digital UK were aligned with those outcomes; or
  • build in adequate customer protection to prevent the potential mis-selling of analogue televisions in the run up to switchover.

Passing responsibility to delivery partners without adequate accountability or clarity of purpose puts value for money at risk. The Departments should clarify the outcomes they require to deliver their policy objectives and should seek assurances from the BBC that public money for the help scheme and information campaign will only be spent to deliver these outcomes.

4.  Take up of the help scheme in Copeland, the first area to switch to digital, suggests that demand for the scheme will be much lower than the Departments' forecasts, which look increasingly out of date. The Departments should review whether the scheme is reaching enough people and achieving its objectives, based on what happens in the Border region, which will be the first full region to switch. In the light of this review, they should amend the design of the scheme and the funds available as necessary before proceeding with switchover in the Granada region from October 2009.

5.  The only evidence of help scheme take-up available to the Departments is from Copeland in Cumbria. If this level of take-up is repeated elsewhere, there would be a surplus of £250 million in licence fee funds ring-fenced for the help scheme. The Departments have not identified what they will do in the event of a substantial funding surplus, or in the less likely event of a deficit. To promote effective accountability and stewardship of public funds, they should decide, before the implementation of switchover in Granada, how any surplus will be spent or deficit funded.

6.  The Departments have not defined success measures for the help scheme. The BBC subsidiary company, DSHS Limited, set up to administer the help scheme, is incentivised to maximise customer satisfaction, but that measure alone will not provide assurance of value for money. The scheme needs to strike the right balance between supporting vulnerable consumers and spending public money only where it is needed. The Departments should clarify the outcomes they wish to achieve from the scheme and should seek assurance from the BBC that it is taking action to deliver these outcomes.

7.  The Departments' reliance on voluntary labelling and the work of Digital UK to protect consumers from potential miss-selling of analogue televisions in the run-up to switchover has, so far, not worked. The 'Digital Tick' was introduced nearly four years ago, but only half the staff in the two thirds of stores which use the Digital Tick logo understand what it means. Given reliance on the logo to protect consumers, the Departments should set out how, by the end of 2008, they will try to secure take-up of the logo by at least 90% of retailers (by sales), and at least 90% understanding of the Digital Tick among staff selling television equipment in retail stores. This should substantially reduce the risk that consumers will unwittingly purchase televisions with built-in obsolescence.

8.  The help scheme provides assistance to eligible people who wish to convert their second sets to digital, even though the Departments have not identified second set conversion as one of their objectives. For some older people and some people with disabilities it is important to be able to watch television in more than one room of the house, and Digital UK has set targets for the rates of second set conversion it is seeking to achieve. The Departments should estimate the likely costs and benefits of helping eligible people to convert their second sets. They should then clarify the scheme's objectives and priorities in respect of primary and secondary set conversion, and should work with the BBC and Digital UK to deliver the desired outcomes.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 26 June 2008