Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by the Department of Health

QUESTIONS 74 (MR AUSTIN MITCHELL) AND 159 (MR IAN DAVIDSON)

Improving GP services in deprived areas

  Despite recent increases in the primary care workforce, there are still significant variations across the country. For example, the PCT with most GPs and nurses for its population (Cambridge PCT with 124 GPs and practice nurses per 100,000 weighted population) has almost twice those of the least (Barking and Dagenham which has 64 GPs and nurses per 100,000 weighted population).

  Research (by U.S academic Barbara Starfied) has shown that increasing the number of primary care clinicians is the most effective way of improving the health of a population.

Yet when we look at those parts of the country with worse health outcomes and high levels of deprivation, we find they have fewest primary care clinicians. This also means that GPs in deprived areas tend to be spread more thinly and be more stretched than colleagues elsewhere. Amongst other problems, this can make it difficult for patients to book convenient appointments. Where there are fewer GP practices, this also gives the local public less choice (or no choice) over which practice they register with.

  This is not a new problem but one that has persisted since the inception of the NHS and one that has been the subject of many attempts by past Governments to attract more GPs to work in these areas.

  The interim report of the NHS Next Stage Review, "Our NHS, Our Future", acknowledged these issues and committed to improving access to primary care for those living in more disadvantaged or deprived areas. This also means making services more personal and designing them to fit with people's often busy lives.

  The interim report set out a number of commitments to make services more equitable and to ensure patients have real choice. These included a commitment to invest extra resources to bring new GP practices into the 25% of PCTs with the greatest need for extra primary care and to develop GP-led health centres in all PCTs.

NEW GP PRACTICES

  We subsequently developed a set of criteria to identify the 25% of PCTs that should benefit from investment in new GP practices. The main criterion was the number of GPs and practice nurses per head of population, but the criteria also gave some weight to health outcomes and to patient satisfaction with access to GP services. These criteria were developed in consultation with SHAs and PCTs to help make sure that we targeted additional investment on those areas where it is most needed.

  Annex A sets out the 38 PCTs (25% of all PCTs) identified as having the greatest needs. These PCTs will between them be procuring the hundred new GP practices to which the Government committed in the interim report.

  These new practices will not only increase the availability of primary care services in places that need it most. They will also all have extended opening hours, wide practice boundaries to give the local public greater choice of which GP practice they register with, and will have a particular focus on reaching out to local communities to promote good health.

HEALTH CENTRES

  The additional investment is also being used to enable all PCTs to develop additional primary care services for their area that will be based in GP-led health centres. These health centres will be open from 8.00 am till 8.00 pm, seven days a week. They will include GP services that offer both bookable appointments and walk-in services, both for patients who want to register with the health centre (as their local GP practice) and for patients who are registered with other GP practices but would benefit from also being able to use these new services (eg commuters). In most cases, these core GP services will be co-located and increasingly integrated with other community based services, such as pharmacy, urgent care, dental services, diagnostic facilities, and social care.

INVESTMENT

  On 10 October the Secretary of State for Health announced a package of new financial investment to support PCTs in developing these new GP practices and health centres. Over the five years from 2008-09 to 2012-13, this investment will total over £1 billion (£60 million in 2008-09, £200 million in 2009-10 and £250 million annually thereafter).

LOCAL FLEXIBILITY

  This investment is designed to help the NHS new services that are responsive to local needs, increase patient choice and promote innovation. The Department has established a small number of core features that we expect PCTs to reflect in their specifications for these new services.

  In the case of GP practices, we would typically expect the practice to have the capacity to service a registered list of at least 6,000 patients, to offer extended opening hours, to have wide practice boundaries, to be fully engaged in practice based commissioning, and to plan to be a training practice.

  In the case of health centres, we have indicated that the centres should be in easily accessible locations, be open from 8.00 am to 8.00 pm, seven days a week, provide services for both registered and non-registered patients, and offer both bookable GP appointments and walk-in services. We have also indicated that PCTs should maximise opportunities to integrate and co-locate these core GP services with other community based services such as pharmacy services, diagnostic services and social care.

  Beyond these core requirements, it is for PCTs to develop the specifications for these services locally, in consultation with the public and with local clinicians. We are looking to PCTs to identify how best to use the investment to improve access to primary care, promote more integrated services for patients, and achieve a stronger focus on promoting health and reducing health inequalities.

OPEN AND TRANSPARENT PROCUREMENTS

  We have asked PCTs to undertake open and transparent procurements for these new primary care services. This is to ensure that the fullest possible range of potential service providers are able to put forward innovative proposals, including existing GPs, voluntary and third sector organisations, and independent sector organisations. PCTs will award contracts to those providers who can offer both high quality services and value for money.

Annex A

RankPCT SHA
1Manchester PCTNorth West SHA
2Barking and Dagenham PCT London SHA
3Knowsley PCTNorth West HSA
4Sandwell PCTWest Midlands SHA
5Wolverhampton City PCT West Midlands SHA
6Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale PCT North West HSA
7Liverpool PCTNorth West SHA
8Sunderland Teaching PCT North East SHA
9Birmingham East and North PCT West Midlands SHA
10Halton and St Helens PCT North West SHA
11Heart of Birmingham Teaching PCT West Midlands SHA
12Barnsley PCTYorkshire and The Humber SHA
13Leciester City PCT East Midlands SHA
14Oldham PCTNorth West HSA
15Blackburn with Darwen PCT North West SHA
16Stoke on Trent PCT West Midlands SHA
17Hounslow PCTLondon SHA
18Hull PCTYorkshire and The Humber SHA
19Nottingham City PCT East Midlands SHA
20Blackpool PCTNorth West SHA
21Ashton, Leigh and Wigan PCT North West SHA
22Dudley PCTWest Midlands SHA
23Bolton PCTNorthWest HSA
24Greenwich Teaching PCT London HSA
25Sefton PCTNorth West HSA
26Medway Teaching PCT South East Coast SHA
27Salford PCTNorth West SHA
28Hartlepool PCTNorth East SHA
29Tameside and Glossop PCT North West HSA
30Walsall Teaching PCT West Midlands SHA
31Newcastle PCTNorth East SHA
32Redcar and Cleveland PCT North East SHA
33South Tyneside PCT North East SHA
34Calderdale PCTYorkshire and The Humber SHA
35North Lancashire PCT North West SHA
36Luton Teaching PCT East of England SHA
37Havering PCTLondon SHA
38Hammersmith and Fulham PCT London SHA





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 9 October 2008