Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by HM Revenue and Customs

Question 71 (Mr Don Touhig):   Could you perhaps provide us with a note, looking back at that £2.8 billion, [understated Self Assessment Tax liability] as to how much you are getting and you reckon you have had back in and how much you think you might have to provide for the tax gap

  Details about figures on tax losses, and other additional information can be found in Developing Methodologies for Estimating Direct Tax Losses, a technical document published alongside the Pre-Budget Report on 9 October 2007, available on the HMRC website:

  www.hmrc.gov.uk/pbr2007/mdtl-direct.pdf

  The figure of £2.8 billion given on in Table 3.1 of that document is an estimate of the understatement of tax liabilities on 2001-02 Income Tax Self Assessment (ITSA) returns and is based on the ITSA random enquiry programme. As with any statistical estimate it is subject to a degree of uncertainty.

Table 3.1

LOSSES IDENTIFIED FOR ITSA RETURNS (£ BILLION)2
1999-20002000-01 2001-02
Losses due to incorrect returns2.4 2.72.8
Compliance Yield10.4 0.40.4
Non-payment0.10.1 0.1
Total tax losses identified2.1 2.32.5
Total tax liabilities19.6 19.819.2
Proportion of liabilities (per cent) 11%12%13%


1  Enquiries settled during each year

2  Figures rounded to the nearest £0.1 billion. As a result components may not appear to sum.

  Recovery of all understated liabilities would involve work with many millions of taxpayers and would not be cost effective; instead HMRC's strategy is to focus its compliance work according to the level of risk in each case.

Question 112 (Mr Philip Dunne):   Has the level of complaints been rising or declining since the development of contact centres

  We do not believe that there is a correlation between the introduction of HMRC contact centres and the level of complaints. The attached table sets out the number of complaints received over the last 10 years. The most recent data shows a 7% decline—at a time when HMRC contact centres underwent significant expansion.

  HMRC has gained several major new responsibilities over the period. As would be expected, the volume of contacts has risen in consequence and also the numbers of complaints. There were two new major responsibilities introduced. The merger between the Inland Revenue and National Insurance Contributions Office in April 1999, which resulted in an additional 10,000 complaints, and the introduction of new tax credits from 2003 onwards.

  Other factors that have influenced the volume of complaints received include the measures introduced by the Inland Revenue and Customs to improve access to their complaints systems. Better signposting for customers as a result of improved customer service can lead to more complaints. Customers know where and how to complain. The Citizens Charter, which set out standards customers can expect, was also introduced at this time. HMRC believe that these and the general expectations and attitudes to challenging poor service are key reasons why complaints numbers have risen.

  Complaints about HMRC contact centres do not make up a significant proportion of the overall number of complaints—only 4% last year.
YearIR CEHMRCTotal
2006-07 99,13999,139
2005-06 106,783106,783
2004-0587,2146,540 93,754
2003-0468,7007,478 76,178
2002-0342,0009,472 51,472
2001-0237,00011,885 48,885
2000-0142,00010,501 52,501
1999-200048,0006,182 54,182
1998-9937,0005,412 42,412
1997-9834,0005,140 39,140
1996-9728,0004,339 32,339





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 15 May 2008