Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 20-39)

JOBCENTRE PLUS

30 April 2008

  Q20  Mr Touhig: But were they unsuitable because of their location, the layout of the buildings or whatever?

  Mrs Strathie: They were not going to deliver the level of service we wanted. We were unable to deliver our range of services from those locations.

  Q21  Mr Touhig: How much money did you spend on that part of the project before you pulled the plug?

  Mr Groombridge: The makeover cost of the 49 rolled out offices we have closed and the 10 we have plans to close is about £20 million.

  Q22  Mr Touhig: That is a lot of money.

  Mr Groombridge: But there will be savings when all of them have been disposed of.

  Q23  Mr Touhig: You have to sell 12 of them. How much do you expect to get for those you plan to sell?

  Mr Groombridge: Once all of those offices are disposed of the running cost savings will be about £13½ million a year.

  Q24  Mr Touhig: You spent £20 million on the capital cost of doing that?

  Mr Groombridge: Yes.

  Q25  Mr Touhig: There is one matter that concerns me about the way the project has rolled out. You started with 1,500 offices and had a 30% cut to 1,000 and a further 20% cut to 800. Why did you think you needed 1,000 in the first place?

  Mrs Strathie: It was a planning assumption, and that is about a much as one could say. Bear in mind that we were going from 1,500 Benefits Agency and social security offices and so on.

  Q26  Mr Touhig: It included Benefits Agency offices as well?

  Mrs Strathie: Yes. That was the total network. We knew we were not going to replace like for like and were looking to integrate. Therefore, 1,000 was approximately where we expected to get to. At that time it did not include our aspiration for the centralisation of benefits processing, so as we rolled out we took the decision that we did not actually need 1,000 of those.

  Q27  Mr Touhig: Can you deliver the service effectively with 800?

  Mrs Strathie: Yes, absolutely, and we are. On any measure we are delivering a much improved service.

  Q28  Mr Touhig: You have had to sack 15,000 people. Did you close offices in order to meet your targets to get rid of people?

  Mrs Strathie: No.

  Q29  Mr Touhig: That was not a factor at all?

  Mrs Strathie: During the 2004 spending review we reduced our whole time equivalent headcount by 16,500. Office closure was in no way related to that. What we did was create contact centres.

  Q30  Mr Touhig: But did the reduction in the number of staff help you to achieve your target?

  Mrs Strathie: No.

  Q31  Mr Touhig: It did not at all?

  Mrs Strathie: No. I do not see that the two are connected. The efficiency derived from delivering the service in a much better way. The fact that more customers used our self-service channels allowed us to release those numbers. I am not sure if that is what you are driving at.

  Q32  Mr Touhig: I am just trying to explore whether you closed offices in order to reduce the number of staff and meet your target?

  Mrs Strathie: Absolutely not.

  Q33  Mr Touhig: I have learned from talking to your staff that you have a good reputation for pushing decision-making down, but when as a result of local decisions that pushed up your project by £100 million you had to take the decision about the layout of offices and so on from the districts and decide it centrally, what impact did it have on the staff? Was it difficult?

  Mr Davies: As to the impact on staff, it was generally understood what was going on. There were occasional questions.

  Q34  Mr Touhig: But they had been used to taking decisions locally and you encouraged that a lot?

  Mr Davies: They had, but I think it was fully understood by them that these decisions were of such importance that they probably needed a look across the country to see what was going on in the Jobcentre Plus approach, and I think it was the right thing to do.

  Q35  Mr Touhig: You have now got rid of the cards that one saw in every Jobcentre. One went along and looked at a card. The prevailing wisdom was that one put up cards for jobs about 15 miles away and nothing else. Now you have touch screens. When I went to my local Jobcentre Plus I found a job in Dieppe. Have you researched that more people are now prepared to travel much greater distances because you have touch screens?

  Mrs Strathie: From the very first prototype jobpoints we put into the old Employment Service jobcentres we quickly discovered that customers serving themselves were much more likely to broaden their job search both in the type of job applied for and the distance travelled than just straightforward intervention. If we look at where we are now, on average our website gets 1,089,000 hits a week. That is the number of customers who are able to search for themselves as well as providers in some cases.

  Q36  Mr Touhig: They can search from home?

  Mrs Strathie: Yes; they can search from any internet access.

  Q37  Mr Touhig: Do you encourage people to go home? I had a case where someone was discouraged from using the touch screens at the Jobcentre and was told to go home and use a personal computer. Is that the policy?

  Mrs Strathie: It is absolutely wrong if someone who wants to use a job point in a Jobcentre is told that he or she cannot and is asked to go home. One of our strands to bring about a cultural change is to explain to customers that they do not need to come into the Jobcentre to use the job point. We have job points in lots of places. You can do it from any internet cafe or library. There are lots of ways in which people can access the service. We try to help customers use it and navigate the system.

  Q38  Mr Bacon: I should like to start with your CVs that may reveal an interesting theme that is pertinent in analysing the success of this project. Mr Davies, your CV says: "I have been a civil servant since 1965"—a mere 43 years—"and my career history is in administration of social security." This is a sentence that may make some strong men wilt but I have to say you look remarkably well on it.

  Mr Davies: I am paid well—and you can use that in discussions.

  Q39  Mr Bacon: Mr Groombridge, you have been in the service for 35 years. You started in a local social security office and you are still in the same department. Mrs Strathie is a mere slip at 34 years. Mr Davies, when you started were you in the administrative trainee fast stream?

  Mr Davies: I was not.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 11 September 2008