Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 120-121)

POSTCOMM, OFCOM AND OFGEM

  Q120  Chairman: Why do Ofcom and Ofgem not have a finance director on the board?

  Mr Buchanan: We have a chartered accountant in terms of running the SMT, which is myself, and we have an outstanding chief operating officer who I think for the four or fifth year in a row—I am looking at the NAO now—has delivered clean and very efficient accounts. We are the first organisation in the public sector to deliver that. We have had two discussions with the Treasury and Dame Sheila Masters. The Treasury understood our unique position. We are a small organisation. There is an accounting qualified representative on the board—me—but the chief operating officer is running an exceptionally tight ship such that our services have been sought by other regulators.

  Q121  Chairman: Do not go on protesting too much. What about Ofcom?

  Mr Richards: The answer is fairly similar. We have had successful accounts ever since we were created. We have a very good finance director who is on our executive committee. That runs the show in an executive sense. Our board overwhelmingly concentrates on the range of very complex policy issues that we have to deal with and that is where the centre of gravity has been judged to be by the board itself.

  Chairman: Thank you very much for your evidence. That concludes the hearing. It is clear to me that the more vulnerable members of society still do not get the benefit they should obtain from the removal of price controls. It is also apparent to me that although it is relatively easy to do the process of switching there is a plethora of very confusing information, so clearly there is still a lot of work for all of you to do.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 13 November 2008