Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140-144)

POSTCOMM

  Q140  Mr Bacon: You did not think it was relevant! Excuse me. Hang on a minute, because you have given long answers and I do not have long. We have other things to talk about actually. You did not think it was relevant to tell us that you were about to publish important documents about the future of the universal service obligation when we were asking you questions about the future of the universal service obligation? You did not think it was relevant?

  Ms Chambers: You were asking me very specific questions, I believe, about Saturday deliveries.

  Mr Bacon: My question to you now is about why you did not tell this Committee that you were about to publish important documents on the future of the universal service obligation when we were asking you questions about the future of the universal service obligation.

  Chairman: That very evening.

  Q141  Mr Bacon: That is the point, and your answer is you did not think it was relevant!

  Ms Chambers: I did not believe that you were asking me general questions about future policy. The Independent Review is about future policy and about future changes to universal service. What I thought you were asking me about, based on the leaks to the Daily Telegraph and other papers, were some very specific questions—

  Q142  Mr Bacon: ... was the threats to the future of the universal service obligation. I remember asking you that. The instant case happened to be Saturday mornings but I was asking you about threats to the future of the universal service obligation. I would have thought that would have been obvious to a semi-lobotomised chimpanzee, let alone to somebody of your considerable education and talent.

  Ms Chambers: I honestly do not remember you—and maybe I am remembering it wrong—I do not remember you asking me very general questions about the universal service and how it might be changed. I remember being asked some very specific questions about Saturday deliveries, and those, I believe, I answered pretty fully. If I had thought you were asking me much more general questions about the future of the universal service, and you knew the Independent Review was about to receive all the submissions, you had an opportunity to ask me about other general issues if you had so wished and I would have answered them.

  Mr Bacon: I think you had an opportunity to tell us a lot more than you did, frankly. I have no further questions, Chairman.

  Q143  Chairman: I think that concludes our hearing. I have to say, Ms Chambers, I am very dissatisfied with your conduct. I think that you are playing absolutely by the letter of the law, and we expect witnesses to be honest with us and give us an answer to the spirit of the law as well, to give us full and frank answers. We do not expect to see accounting officers coming before us at 4 o'clock in the afternoon and giving as narrow an answer as possible, and then about three hours later making an announcement on the national news, frankly, on the same areas we were asking about.

  Ms Chambers: I am sorry, Chairman. I do not believe it was dishonest.

  Q144  Chairman: I will let you have the last word because I have criticised you in public session but it is important that we establish this principle now for future accounting officers appearing in front of this Committee. I will now give you the last word to defend your reputation.

  Ms Chambers: Thank you. Nothing I said was dishonest. I was not attempting to give as narrow an answer as possible. I did know that we were going to make an announcement. I did not feel—and maybe this was a misjudgment—it was appropriate for me to use your hearing to promote our views on an area which I thought was a completely different area of future policy recommendation than the subject matter of the NAO Report and, indeed, your rather wider questions. I thought that if I had sought to use your Committee to promote my own views, you would have criticised me for trying to do that. Maybe this was a wrong judgment but it was a judgment that I felt at the time was right and I was not meaning any discourtesy. I am sorry for that.

  Chairman: Thank you very much, Ms Chambers. That concludes this hearing.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 13 November 2008