Select Committee on Public Accounts Forty-Ninth Report


4   Making applications on-line

27. Making grant applications on-line can improve the cost-efficiency of a grant process, the quality of applications received and the experience of the grant applicant. In the culture, media and sport sector, development of an on-line application process was at an early stage and we questioned why grant-makers had not made more progress. We were surprised to see that out of the four grant-makers, only one, Sport England, had the ability to process applications online. All applicants to Sport England's Community Investment Fund programme could apply online, and Sport England was planning to introduce a single on-line application form for all of its grant programmes from September 2008. For other grant programmes, grant-makers continued to receive large numbers of paper-based applications.[28]

28. The Big Lottery Fund told us that it hoped to have on-line applications in 2010 across all of its programmes. Based on earlier trials and research, it considered that online applications could significantly improve the cost-effectiveness of its grant programmes. The Big Lottery Fund had looked at the systems of other organisations including the Arts Council and the Heritage Lottery Fund and, outside the sector, Esme Fairburn, the Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation. It had also looked at the retail banking sector to help establish the best possible online processes. Big Lottery Fund told us that it was looking to develop a system which could be applied at other grant-makers. The Arts Council was also looking to move towards an on-line process during the current spending period, although it considered that some of its applicants would still want the opportunity to make paper-based applications.[29]

29. Grant-makers saw the introduction of an on-line application facility as going some way towards reducing the time taken to process applications and of improving the accuracy of the applications they received. The Big Lottery Fund had found from its People's Millions programme that by accepting on-line applications it had almost 'obliterated' incomplete applications as applicants could only move to the next stage of the process by attaching the right information.[30]

30. In the United States, 26 Federal grant-making organisations share a common website. The website lets applicants know about grant-making opportunities and enables them to submit applications on-line. Lottery distributors in the UK currently run a website together called www.lotteryfunding.com, which directs anyone seeking grants on the internet to relevant opportunities, although excludes exchequer funded opportunities. Once an applicant has identified a suitable grant programme they can print out an application form and the rules and process for applying for the grant, but they could not yet make applications on-line as happens in the USA on the grants-gov website.[31]

31. The Department was cautious about the merits of a one-size fits all system, given the diversity of the sector and the applicants for grants. In the case of the arts, for example a choreographer, painter or writer was likely to approach only the Arts Council for funding, so a central website may not offer any advantages to such an applicant. Nevertheless, the Arts Council conceded that if there was an opportunity to attach an online applications facility to the existing lottery website that would be a great improvement.[32]



28   Qq 12, 40 Back

29   Qq 12, 14, 39, 52 Back

30   Q 38 Back

31   Qq 13-14 Back

32   Q 53 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 6 November 2008