Select Committee on Public Accounts Fifty-Third Report


3   Providing information and compensation to delayed passengers

13.  Successive surveys conducted by Passenger Focus, an independent public body set up by the Government to protect the interests of rail passengers, indicate that passengers remain dissatisfied with the information they receive when their train has been delayed and the rail industry has acknowledged that communication is a priority issue. The Association of Train Operating Companies has set up a working group to investigate how to improve communication with passengers, and has recently issued good practice guidelines to help Train Operating Companies provide better information to passengers during service disruption. There is still a need to improve the way drivers on driver-only operated services communicate with customers.[28]

14.  Passengers who are delayed by service disruption may be eligible for compensation from their Train Operating Companies. These companies have a variety of compensation regimes but the Department is harmonising these arrangements under the new Delay/Repay system being introduced with new franchises.[29] It is unclear, however, what proportion of eligible passengers actually claim compensation, or are even aware of their rights, as Train Operating Companies do not collect this data. Although the proportion was likely to vary between companies, National Express East Anglia, a large company which operates a Delay/Repay scheme, estimated that 30% of eligible passengers on its services claimed compensation.[30]

15.  Compensation terms are set out in each Train Operating Company's Passenger Charter but very few passengers are likely to read this document. Four long distance operators, East Midlands Trains, National Express East Coast, First Transpennine Express and Virgin Trains, provide compensation claim forms to passengers on board services that are delayed, but there is no way of telling whether this happens on all relevant services. Other companies collect passengers' details on heavily delayed trains so that they can contact them later, while some operators provide compensation forms on request.[31]

16.  There is no incentive for Train Operating Companies to help passengers claim the compensation for which they are eligible. The Department does not monitor how much Train Operating Companies pay out in compensation for delays, nor does it monitor how effectively Train Operating Companies advertise their compensation arrangements.[32] Compensation may take the form of a cash refund, a travel voucher or a season ticket extension and may include goodwill payments not required by a train operator's Passenger's Charter. While it did not collect the data centrally, and not all Train Operating Companies were able to supply information, the Association of Train Operating Companies estimated that, in 2007-08, the combined value of cash refunds, travel vouchers and goodwill payments issued by train operators was around £9 million.[33]

17.  In 2007-08, the British Transport Police recorded nearly 1,900 attacks by passengers on rail staff across the network, of which 40% occurred in the London South area. There can be no justification for assaults on rail industry staff under any circumstance, but passengers who are delayed may be more likely to vent their frustration on rail staff. While this has happened in a number of instances, the number of such incidents is not separately available and there is currently no discernable pattern to these attacks.[34]


28   Qq 29-30, 33-37, 51; C&AG's Report, paras 3.1, 3.3 Back

29   Qq 124-126; C&AG's Report, paras 3.11-3.12 Back

30   Qq 62-68; Ev 15 Back

31   Qq 65-68, 76-79; Ev 15 Back

32   Qq 55-58, 69-70, 73-74 Back

33   Ev 15 Back

34   Qq 80-82; Ev 16 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 18 November 2008