Select Committee on Public Accounts Fifty-Sixth Report


3  Promoting consistency across the network

17. While the Council has pockets of excellence, it agreed with the National Audit Office's findings that it has problems in ensuring consistent standards across its global network.[29] To help address this problem, the Council has reorganised its business from 110 disparate country operations into 12 regions. The corporate centre in London now has dealings with 12 regions, rather than 110 countries. Each region is headed by a Regional Director who is responsible for ensuring that corporate policies are consistently applied and that each country within the region delivers against the set programmes. The Council has also introduced a new agreement between the Regional Director and the corporate centre, which sets out the contribution that each region is expected to make towards the delivery of the Council's corporate outcomes.[30]

18. While the move from countries to regions is starting to improve consistency, the Council's tools for assessing performance are not applied in the same way across all Regions. The Council measures customer feedback after some of its events, but staff have wide discretion over which events to obtain feedback. To prevent bias in the measurement process, in most cases, the Council decides before the event whether to collect customer feedback.[31]

19. Customer evaluation is, however, only one of the ways in which the Council attempts to evaluate its work. It collects customer satisfaction data through, for example, its teaching and examinations business, and uses an Evaluations of Long-Term Outcomes (ELTOS) to collect information on the broader impact of the Council's work. The ELTOS programme is run by an external survey organisation so as not to influence responses. The Council is also working with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on how to better measure the impact of its work on public diplomacy. In this difficult to measure area, the Council is generally regarded as being ahead of comparator organisations from other countries.[32]

20. In a customer-facing organisation such as the Council, which has contact with over 15 million people per year, it is important for it to be able to manage and track its customer contacts and deliver good customer service standards. The Council has a target of answering all emails within seven days and all telephone calls within two minutes. It estimates that it is only meeting these standards in around three-quarters of customer contacts, and is not meeting them consistently across its network. In the last year, only 10 out of 12 regions improved their customer satisfaction scores. The Council looks to its Regional Directors to raise customer service standards across their region. For example, the Middle East Region has put in place Customer Service Managers in each office and is running a Customer Service Excellence Project. The Council is also moving from an annual to a quarterly 'mystery shopping' survey to identify earlier those regions which are not meeting their targets. Once the Council has achieved a consistent level of satisfaction across all 12 regions, it will then concentrate on raising overall standards.[33]

21. The Council does not have a single, integrated system for recording its customer contact information. In order to measure how many new contacts it had made in a year, it would have to interrogate multiple systems, mainly at the country level.[34] The Council has a customer relationship management project to investigate a global solution, but this is currently two years behind schedule. The delay is partly due to the complexity and scale of developing a global system which can collate customer contact details across 110 countries, and partly from the Council being understandably reluctant to commission an IT solution until they have a clear specification.[35]

22. The Council has so far spent around £300,000 on its customer relationship management project, but is prudent in being unwilling to commit further funds to develop an IT solution until the technical specification has been adequately defined. The Council is running pilot programmes in China and Europe to investigate how it could deliver a joined-up customer relationship management system and to define its requirements, such as the type of information the Council will need to collect on its customers, and what is the most effective way of keeping in touch with its different types of customers.[36]

23. The Council admitted that some staff were becoming frustrated with the slow pace of change. The risk in further delaying an integrated customer relationship management system is that countries and regions may start to develop their own systems, which must then be integrated into a corporate solution, once this has been developed. The Council is relying on its Regional Directors to engage with corporate programmes, and pointed to its IT controls which manage the creation of ad hoc new database systems.[37]


29   Q 43 Back

30   Qq 43, 55 Back

31   Qq 66-67, C&AG's Report, paras 3.10-3.11 Back

32   Qq 66-67, C&AG's Report, paras 3.2-3.3 Back

33   Qq 58, 70-72 Back

34   Q 59 Back

35   Qq 60, 135 Back

36   Qq 60, 135 Back

37   Q 61 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 11 December 2008