Select Committee on Public Administration Written Evidence


Memorandum from Communities and Local Government

SUMMARY

  1.  This memorandum sets out:

    —  The vision and work of Communities and Local Government and the importance of empowering and involving citizens and communities, how it can deliver improved services and help tackle increasingly complex challenges such as community cohesion.

    —  Explains some of the work of the Department, in particular the recent Local Government White Paper and its implementation.

    —  Places the involvement of citizens and service users within a wider framework—a wider approach of putting people at the centre of public services, which includes local accountability and the performance framework.

    —  Highlights several key issues which this agenda raises: where involvement is appropriate, involvement for all and community cohesion, and the need for capacity building.

    —  Provides some further examples of involvement in the work of the Department.

INTRODUCTION

  2.  The vision of Communities and Local Government (hereafter referred to as the Department) is of prosperous and cohesive communities, offering a safe, healthy and sustainable environment for all. The work of the Department is therefore focussed on "place", and the communities and people within them; recognising the need for different public agencies to work together at the local level to tackle increasingly complex issues such as health and deprivation, and to secure services that best meet the needs of citizens and users.

  3.  Empowered and confident communities, with higher levels of democratic participation and citizen engagement are central to achieving this vision. Our role is to build the capacity of communities to shape and protect their own future. Service providers therefore need to build "involvement" into all aspects of policy and delivery, providing a range of opportunities which are accessible to all.

  4.  Opportunities for citizen and service user involvement need to be wide ranging, from people being able to provide feedback and express views; through to co-production, with citizens and service users working with service providers, becoming responsible for contributing towards solutions. Crucially, involvement also needs to be part of a wider approach of putting people at the centre of public services. This includes a performance framework providing accountability to and reflecting the voice of citizens, and local public services which have the freedom to respond to local priorities. When citizens and service users become involved in local services or identify innovative solutions to local problems, they need to be confident of action.

  5.  The Department has therefore set out in Strong and Prosperous Communities[75] a framework to give local people and communities more influence and power to improve their lives, and a stronger role for councils to lead their communities. This new settlement between central government, local government and citizens aims to put in place the incentives and opportunities for local government and its partners to improve radically the services we receive and the places in which we live. This vision is already starting to be delivered through for example the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill. [76]

THE CASE FOR EMPOWERMENT AND INVOLVEMENT

  6.  The quality of public services has been improving, but people increasingly expect the speed and range of services available on the high street and on the internet to be mirrored in the public services they receive. People also want to be treated as individuals and to receive a service that is tailored to their personal situation or community.

  7.  We are also facing complex challenges such as anti-social behaviour and community cohesion, which need public agencies, citizens and the Voluntary and Community Sector to work together. However efficient public agencies may be at delivering their particular service, they will struggle to make significant and lasting improvements if the underlying issues which require partnership working are not addressed. Partnership working is now a normal way to do business for most local authorities, but effective partnerships needs strategic leadership.

  8.  Local Government is a vital part of our democracy and has an important role to play working with local partners. The vast majority of interactions between citizens and the state take place through local government and councillors are democratically elected representatives; its strength is its closeness to its communities. It therefore has an important role in working with citizens and communities and partners, as a strategic leader and place-shaper.

  9.  There is clear and growing evidence from both the UK and abroad that community participation is a highly effective way of driving up the performance of public services; and while there is much that can be learnt from the non public sector and overseas governments, there is significant good practice within UK public services and local government. For example involving tenants in the management of their homes has led to better services and improvements on the ground. "When tenants influence services they are more effective, efficient and responsive".[77] Manchester City Council runs an annual campaign to encourage local people to help make their area a better place to live. This year the focus was on issues facing young people, in particular school attendance. The campaign on school attendance involved all the schools in the city and resulted in more than 4,000 extra days attendance during the 100 day campaign, compared to the same period in the previous year.

  10.  But despite the good achievements, the challenge is for all local services to reach the standard of the best. A recent Audit Commission report found that authorities' approach to consultation and involvement of users and residents is at "different stages of maturity".[78] Some authorities engaged well with residents and understood their needs; others were unclear about how engagement fed into decision-making. Independent evidence suggests that only a third of people believe they can influence authority decision-making and a similar number report that their authority had provided opportunities to give their views on services or issues. [79]

ACHIEVING THE VISION

  11.  Transforming communities and delivering responsive local services needs local partners, citizens and voluntary and community groups to work together. The Department has therefore set out in Strong and Prosperous Communities a framework to give local people and local communities more influence and power to improve their lives through a rebalancing of the relationship between central government, local government and local people:

    —  A stronger role for councils to lead their communities, shape neighbourhoods and bring public services together.

    —  Freedom and space for councils to respond with flexibility to local needs and demands.

    —  New powers and support for communities to be empowered and involved.

    —  Recognising and supporting the different roles of the voluntary and community sector—shaping and designing effective services, representation and advocacy, lobbying and influencing policy.

  12.  We are now working with stakeholders to deliver the vision set out in the White Paper. This includes the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill, which will play a key role in delivering the Government's public service reform agenda, key provisions include:

    —  A new duty on best value authorities[80] to inform, consult and involve people in local services and policies, where appropriate, with local areas deciding how best to meet this duty given their particular local circumstances.

    —  More visible leadership including a ward Councillor with a stronger role in representing the needs and concerns of the local community.

    —  A right of response for local people through the Community Call for Action.

  Examples of other steps we are taking to implement the White Paper are covered in the section below paragraphs 16—23, a full implementation plan will be published later in January 2007.

  13.  We also continue to build empowerment and responsiveness into other policies and area of work. This includes for example our approach to consultation (see paragraphs 31-34 for further information).

THE FRAMEWORK FOR EMPOWERMENT

  14.  Central to the White Paper and the work of the Department is the principle that citizens and users should be more involved in the design, delivery and assessment of local services; with service providers offering a range of opportunities, which are accessible to all. Involvement in public services can be very wide ranging, and should encompass all aspects of policy development and services.

  15.  For this to become a reality, a shift in an organisation's culture may be required, with involvement being built into key aspects of an organisations activity—informing decision making and priority setting from the start, rather than a "bolt on" at the end of a process. Involvement also needs to be part of a wider approach to putting citizens and services users at the heart of public services. In practice this means that the following key aspects should be in place locally:

  16.   Local strategic leadership and governance—places need strong strategic leadership, councillors who champion the needs of their local area, and the freedom to respond to local priorities. The White Paper supports this vision: the performance framework will provide greater space for local priorities and the forthcoming Bill will include:

    —  A duty on the local authority and named partners to co-operate with each other to agree targets. [81]

    —  A strengthened role for ward councillors through the Community Call for Action.

    —  Provide a new power of well-being for Quality Parish Councils.

  17.  The role of citizens and service users in local governance arrangements is also be strengthened, through for example the new power for Parishes and the cross-Government Citizen Governance Project, enabling more citizens, particularly those from under-represented groups, to become community leaders.

  18.   Performance framework—for local areas the White Paper sets out a performance framework that provides space for local priorities, as noted above, and strengthens accountability to citizens and communities (through for example more effective means of redress) and places the citizen "voice" as central to important aspects of the performance framework. The citizen "voice" includes for example:

    —  A small set of citizen perspective indicators, encompassing citizen experience, perceptions, expectations and satisfaction, as part of the national outcome indicators set. Indicators on the views of citizens can be used alongside other performance indicators to take a view on performance. This is being taken forward as part of the wider CSR07 process. Satisfaction on its own is not sufficient to either understand how services are experienced, or to judge performance if not analysed alongside expectations, other performance indicators and the external factors which may impact upon satisfaction. [82]

    —  Working with the Audit Commission to ensure that audit and inspection have a greater focus on citizen experience and perspectives, and that the results of audit, assessment and inspection become more publicly accessible.

    —  Supporting the use of business process improvement techniques that, in line with the recommendations of the Varney Review, enable services to be designed around the needs of customers with benefit both for outcomes and for efficiency.

  19.  In its issues and questions paper, the committee raises the issue of minimum standards. There will also be some instances where it is appropriate to set national standards, for example to provide protection for the most vulnerable, this must be as part of the performance framework and must provide space for local priorities. Locally, in some services it is possible to locally set minimum standards, for example research suggests that at the local level it is possible to set minimum standards for liveability (see paragraph 36 for further information). This could for example be included as part of a local charter. [83]

  20.   Citizen intelligence—while citizens and service users should have opportunities to be more involved and able to voice their views, good quality and responsive services should not be dependant upon high levels of active involvement. Authorities should therefore make effective use of "citizen intelligence" to inform policy and service planning, design and assessment. Fully understanding their citizens' needs, wants, expectations and views, through a variety of sources of information including focus groups, surveys, citizen assessments; socio-economic and demographic data; location and use of local services, complaints; and information from frontline staff. To achieve this we are working with the sector to identify and share good practice, ensuring that it is central to the transformation agenda[84] and working as part of the cross government Customer Insight Forum.

  21.   Information for citizens—citizens and users need reliable and timely information on how to get involved or raise an issue, and how services providers are performing. This is the basis for citizens and service users knowing what they can expect, to compare performance and to effectively make their voice heard—increasing local accountability. The new duty of involvement, being introduced as part of the Bill, will encompass the need to inform local people. The Department will also work with the sector to develop and share good practice, as shown by examples such as the Portsmouth Report Card, which provides citizens with accessible information on achievements and improvements in key areas, remaining challenges and how local people can get involved, or the "We asked ... you said ... we did" campaign by South Tyneside Council which is used to show residents how the council has listened to their concerns.

  22.   A range of involvement opportunities—of which information for citizens is one aspect, through to expressing views or becoming actively involved. The range of opportunities need to reflect how citizens and service users can or want to get involved, as well as how this can be effectively used to improve services and outcomes. The forthcoming Bill will include a duty on authorities to involve local people (see paragraph 12) covering informing, consulting and more direct forms of involvement, it will be for authorities to decide how best to involve their communities. Involvement could encompass:

    —  Choice, the simplest and most direct way to increase people's control. In the White Paper we aim that, wherever practical, individual users should be offered a choice over what is provided and how it is provided. Current examples include Choice Based Lettings, which aims to enable social housing applicants to choose their homes. Supporting People has also been included within the piloting of the Individual Budget approach, which puts the person who is supported at the centre of the process, giving them the power to decide the nature of their own support, how the support is delivered and who delivers it. The Department is developing further approaches to strengthen user choice and control over housing support and associated services.

    —  Providing views and feedback at the point of receiving a service, or responding to consultation questionnaires. For example the Help Us Plan the Future campaign by Chelmsford on the new Local Development Framework. It was an innovative, highly visual campaign, which has been highly praised, with more than double the target number of questionnaires completed.

    —  Involvement in for example priority setting or the assessment of services, such the Tenant Auditors Project at the Wrekin Housing Trust which gives tenants a hands on role in monitoring Trust services and widens the base of tenant involvement to reach those not engaged in formal structures. The tenants decided to audit three different areas by work shadowing, interviewing employees, telephone call monitoring, satisfaction surveys, inspecting properties and mystery shopping. The service managers set out how the findings will make a difference to the service they provide.

    —  Some communities will wish to go a step further through co-producing solutions or taking over the management or ownership of a public asset. Co-production of solutions, with citizens and service users working with service providers, such as the Pembroke Street Estate Management Board which is resident led and works in partnership with the local authority, which has resulted in greatly increased tenant satisfaction and retention of tenants in the long term as well as significantly decreased vandalism, among other things. We are also increasing opportunities for citizens and communities to take on the management and ownership of local assets and facilities, and simplifying and extending the scope of tenant management.

  23.   Effective redress mechanisms—there are a number of ways that local people can seek redress, for example through complaints, seeking help from their councillor or raising a petition. However, there can be frustration if there is a lack of responsiveness. Through the Bill, we are giving people a new right to an answer by strengthening the role of local councillors through an expanded Community Call for Action (CCfA). [85]Complaining about local services is also becoming easier through a variety of media and new approaches. For example, local authorities are increasingly introducing single points of access to report issues, covering both their services and co-ordinating with those of other providers; and Direct Gov "my council"[86] has introduced direct links to report problems and complaining, as well as accessing helpful information about services.

INVOLVEMENT OF CITIZENS AND SERVICE USERS—KEY ISSUES

Where involvement is appropriate

  24.  There should be a presumption for involvement, however, the nature of that involvement will need to vary according to the specific circumstances. This includes where:

    —  There are differences between types of services in particular universal and personal services. Recipients of personal services want to be treated as individuals, and to receive a service that is tailored to their personal situation; this provides many opportunities for active involvement of individual service users, where appropriately supported. Many of the public services we use are of course more universal, however, that does not mean that we do not want a say in what and how services are delivered, but the nature of that involvement may vary.

    —  Authorities also need to consider the cost of involvement activities, balancing it against available resources and competing priorities. Cost, however, shouldn't necessarily preclude involvement, indeed there is growing evidence that citizen engagement leads to more effective, efficient and cost effective services.

Involvement for all and community cohesion

  25.  The opportunities for citizens and service users to get involved and make their views heard, must be accessible if they are to be effective and encourage a wide range of individuals and communities; this could be in terms of the different types of opportunities, the degree of time commitment needed, the geographical or virtual location, through to practical issues such as if support is available in terms of transport or child care.

  26.  Involvement of all citizens and communities is also crucial to community cohesion; there is an association between feeling able to influence decisions and community cohesion. [87]The challenge of cohesion goes beyond measures such as preventing terrorism, reducing inequalities and modern race relation legislation; we need to forge cohesive, self-confident and prosperous communities that are at ease with themselves. Improving the responsiveness of services to communities, increasing citizen and service user involvement and enhancing the role for community all contribute to cohesion.

  27.  Accessibility and support to take up opportunities is particularly important for the most vulnerable and those who may not typically have their voice heard. The Third Sector, particularly small community groups operating at the neighbourhood level, have a tradition of reaching out to groups that government, central and local, may not. It can often help provide solutions and assistance in both service design and delivery to respond to user needs.

  28.  A study[88] looking at which factors influence peoples perceptions of racial discrimination, found that for some people, within some services, perceptions were directly related to their experiences of the service. The research underlined the need to improve customer service, especially in face to face encounters; improved communications with service users; and involvement and consultation of minority ethnic communities. It also highlighted that services need to demonstrate transparency and accountability, to ensure that they are perceived as treating people fairly.

Capacity building

  29.  It is also important to take into account the need for support and capacity building so that authorities engage and empower communities effectively and that citizens and service users are able to make use of those opportunities. Through the White Paper the Department has set out a number of proposals to support and build the capacity of:

    —  Community groups—this includes: encouraging public bodies who fund capacity building and service providers to work together; greater citizen awareness of how to make a difference through systematic publicity; promoting the use of Take Part, the national framework for active learning for citizens, especially for the disadvantaged; and implementing the cross-government Citizen Governance Project to enable more citizens to become community leaders.

    —  Authorities and councillors—through for example re-launching the Connecting with Communities resource providing authorities with access to practical support; the National Improvement Strategy focussing on the delivery of Local Area Agreement priorities; launching with the Cabinet Office a Beacon Theme in 2007 Transforming Services: Citizen Engagement and Empowerment; and supporting the role of non-executive councillors as democratic champions for local areas.

"INVOLVEMENT" IN OTHER ASPECTS OF THE DEPARTMENT'S WORK

  30.  The following provides examples of citizen and user involvement within the work of the Department and different service areas, and reflects some of the key issues identified throughout the memorandum.

The Department's approach to "involvement"

  31.  The Department is committed to engaging and involving citizens and service users as an important part of our policy development process. This is done primarily through consultation, which complies with the Government's Code of Practice on Consultation. For example, while developing a national Supporting People strategy, we produced an easy-read version of the consultation paper and held a series of service user events. We received over 600 responses from members of the public/service users. This has given us a greater understanding of what users expect in terms of both service provision and delivery.

  32.  The Department also works with representative bodies, such as the National Community Forum, to gain a better understand of policy issues. A review of the Forum has shown positive benefits in assisting the department to understand the impact of its policies on deprived communities especially where the Forum has been asked to consider a specific issue. The REACH project group, sponsored by Phil Woolas, has been set up to make evidence based recommendations aimed at influencing policy-making across Whitehall and the Regions on raising aspirations and achievement among black boys and young men.

  33.  The Department also supports more active forms of involvement. For example, since 1994, council tenants in England have had the statutory right to manage (RTM). The RTM empowers groups of council tenants to create Tenant Management Organisations to collectively manage their homes. Around 250 groups now manage 85,000 homes, with a further 30 groups currently in development.

  34.  The Department also sponsors and provides strategic support to a number of Non Departmental Public Bodies and similar bodies, which have service delivery roles. This includes the Academy for Sustainable Communities (ASC), which is working with communities to increase people's ability to shape the future direction of where they live and work. It is developing a range of learning programmes aimed both at helping local communities to engage more effectively and at increasing and improving the skills of community leaders, local government members and officers, and Local Strategic Partnerships.

Neighbourhood Management

  35.  Neighbourhood management is all about involving residents and bringing them together with service providers to agree and implement improvements in local service delivery. They can also act as a co-ordination point for their neighbourhood, so local people can either complain through the neighbourhood manager or get information on how to complain directly. In areas where it operates, satisfaction levels with the police service, street cleaning in particular and with the area as a place to live have all gone up. [89]The Department is encouraging further take-up of neighbourhood management in all areas, through for example working with local authorities pioneering the approach to promote their achievements and learning.

  36.  Some neighbourhood management initiatives have service level agreements or other formal arrangements which set minimum service standards and embed service improvements. The liveability of a place is determined by often complex interactions between local factors and conditions and the actions and interventions of a range of service providers; making it crucial that any standards are set locally to relate to local priorities, which can vary considerable between and within neighbourhoods. In general, safety and security are top priorities for people in more deprived areas where crime and disorder is at its most acute, compared to the least deprived areas where issues such as community and cleanliness, were deemed more important.

Business Improvement Districts

  37.  Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) give local businesses the opportunity to do more in their local vicinity, over and above that provided through public services, eg focus on the specific areas of concern to business, be that marketing, clean up, safety or public space enhancements. Proposals to establish a BID need to be agreed by a majority of business and a majority by rateable value making the process of engagement and participation in defining the proposals critical to their success.

Housing

  38.  The Tenant Empowerment Programme (TEP) provides funding and support for Tenant Management Organisations. It also provides funding for tenant groups to explore the feasibility of options for tenant-led management or ownership of their homes. The Local Government White Paper sets out the Government's commitment to simplify the regulations for tenant management, and provide opportunities for residents to manage other neighbourhood services. Stakeholders views on what barriers still exist to this approach have been received in response to our discussion paper published on 7 June and will be considered to see if anything can be done.

Fire and Rescue Authorities

  39.  The Department is encouraging all Fire and Rescue Authorities to consider the best ways to involve and communicate with all parts of their communities to ensure their safety. A number of Fire and Rescue Authorities have very successfully used advocates recruited from hard-to-reach parts of their communities to spread fire safety and prevention messages to the most vulnerable.

January 2007




75   Strong and Prosperous Communities-The Local Government White Paper. October 2006. Back

76   The Bill was laid before Parliament for first reading Deember 2006. Back

77   Audit Commission/Housing Corporation report called Housing: improving services through resident involvemnt, (2004). See also the NAO report, English Regions-Getting People Involved: Community Participation in Neighbourhood Renewal (2004). Back

78   Audit Commission's Comprehensive Performance Assessment for 2005. Back

79   Perceptions of Local Government in England: Key findings from qualitative research. October 2006. Back

80   Including Local Authorities and combined fire and rescue authorities. Police Authorities will be exempt from the duty to involve local representatives because they already have statutory consultation requirements. Back

81   As part of the Local Area Agreement, setting out key targets for an area. Back

82   Evidence suggests that factors such as recent use of a service, changes in taxation (eg council tax) and other factors not directly related to a service can impact upon customer satisfaction. Back

83   Pioneered by councils, charters are used to set out service standards and priorities for action which local people expect from the local authority/partners, as well as any obligation that the community has taken on itself. In implementing the White Paper we will encourage the use of local charters. Back

84   Transformational Government is about creating conditions in which government transforms itself, putting citizens and service users at the centre, delivering more responsive services. Back

85   CCfAs are being introduced for crime and disorder issues through the Police and Justice Bill, Through the forthcoming Bill we are now seeking a similar remedy to cover local government matters more generally. Back

86   http://local/direct/gov/uk/mycouncil/ Back

87   85% of respondents who felt they were able to influence decisions affecting their local area thought that their neighbourhood was a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together, compared to 76% of people who felt they could not influence decisions affecting the local area. 2005 Citizenship Survey. Back

88   Qualitative research with 120 Black and Asian respondents, commissioned by the Race Equality Unit in Communities and Local Government in order to better understand how to challenge people's perceptions of racial discrimination by public services. Back

89   Neighbourhood Management: An overview of the 2003 and 2006 Round 1 Pathfinder Household Surveys. Communities and Local Government 2006.


 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 24 March 2008