Select Committee on Scottish Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 41 - 59)

TUESDAY 12 DECEMBER 2006

MS CARRON MCDIARMID, MS CAROL GREER AND MS PHILOMENA DE LIMA

  Q41  Chairman: Good morning and welcome. Perhaps you would introduce yourselves?

  Ms Greer: My name is Carol Greer. I am the Advisory Officer for Citizens Advice Scotland. The area I cover is Highland, the Western Isles and Grampian. My remit is to support the Citizens Advice Bureaux that are operating in that area.

  Ms McDiarmid: My name is Carron McDiarmid. I am Head of Policy and Performance with the Highland Council.

  Ms de Lima: My name is Philomena de Lima. I work for a unit called the UHI Policy Web at the University of the Highlands and Islands. It aims to generate research and debate on the way in which policies impact on rural communities.

  Q42  Chairman: Before we start with detailed questions, would you like to make opening statements?

  Ms McDiarmid: Yes. Thank you very much for the opportunity to give evidence to the Committee today. I hope you found the study tour helpful yesterday, but I have a sense that you will have found that it is not very easy to see poverty in the Highlands and it is not as conspicuous in rural settings as it is in urban setting. That is largely because of our population pattern, meaning it is dispersed. You will not find concentrations of poverty where you do not have concentrations of people, it is really that simple. Also, the nature of a settlement pattern in rural areas means that you have very affluent households living next door to poorer households. Very often that can mask the extent of poverty which exists in rural areas. I think also in our written submission to the Committee we set out our sense of the nature of rural poverty and that covered issues around low wage and income levels, the extent of part-time working, which is higher certainly in Highland than other parts of the country, and a higher level of seasonal employment and seasonal unemployment. In addition to that there is an interesting rural dimension to income status in older age and some very useful research which was done by some academics in Aberdeen University, which basically found that older people in remote and rural areas are indeed the poorest people. In Highland we have a population which is ageing faster than elsewhere in the country, so this is a real concern for us. We have heard also this morning that the nature of rural life brings extra costs, a car is an essential item rather than a luxury, food and fuel prices are higher and that coupled with isolation and a lack of access to services can make life a lot harder in rural areas. We also have some defined fragile areas within Highland and these are defined as areas that suffer from remoteness, an ageing population, poor access to services as well as a lack of economic opportunity. In terms of targeting rural poverty, we need to look at fragility rather than an urban approach which looks at concentrations of multiple deprivations. In the written submission we provided we supplied information on the extent of fuel poverty in Highland. I am not sure if you want to ask questions about that, I can provide some information on that in a moment. That is a real problem, not just in Highland but for all of rural Scotland where you are much more likely to be fuel poor if you live in a rural area and there are lots of reasons for that. Access to services is another issue, and the council tries hard to make sure that service delivery is kept local to keep jobs and services available to people. Also in our submission I think we mentioned the costs of providing services to super sparse areas where we do not have additional Government funding to deliver services which cost more to deliver because we do not have economies of scale. I have some figures on that if you are interested. That is all I would like to say just now.

  Ms de Lima: Is it possible for me to pick up on a couple of points which were raised in the previous discussion?

  Q43  Chairman: Yes, if you would like to, but very briefly.

  Ms de Lima: Basically, I think there was an issue discussed around the lack of public transport and the way in which that is a barrier. Lack of transport could be a big barrier in terms of getting into work and I know you have a particular interest in getting people who are out of work into work. One possible way of overcoming some of the transport problems might be to provide some sort of grant or loan system for young people who would like to get into work but do not have access to a car, for example. That could be one way of providing some support for people initially to get into work by providing them with some kind of grant or subsidy initially to get them on their feet. That is one possibility and it has been suggested by researchers before[35] when they have looked at rural poverty. I do not know how complex it is because I do not know enough about it, but hypothecation of, for example, fuel duties in rural areas could be used to be reinvested in transport measures[36]. You might look at things like subsidised taxes for targeted groups, dial-a-ride schemes and community transport, so there might be a way of generating an income to enable transport initiatives to take place at a local level, although I do not know the practicalities of how the fuel duty might be hypothecated. I just wanted to make those two points.


  Ms Greer: Many of the problems which Carron has alluded to apply also to the kind of clients we see. There is very clear evidence from the clients who come to Citizens Advice Bureaux in rural areas of income deprivation: low income; employment issues, particularly low wage and seasonal employment; fuel poverty; debt, particularly housing and homelessness; and access to services. We obviously have our own challenges trying to provide services to clients in rural areas. We share many of the same problems as the other agencies in that respect. We are finding particularly that the withdrawal of services like Jobcentre Plus is having an adverse effect on our clients, and we have produced quite a lot of social policy evidence to that effect. There are issues around the withdrawal of local advice and support services for people who have an expectation of agencies like Citizens Advice Bureaux filling that gap without necessarily the resources being provided to us to do that. I have got some statistics for you for Highland for client use of our services if you are interested, but very broadly just to give you an idea. For April 2005 to March 2006, within Highland we dealt with nearly 11,500 issues relating to benefits and of those 2,500-ish related to disability benefits or disabled person's tax credits. Those are people who have particular access problems. Over 2,500 issues related to debt, just over 2,600 related to employment and about the same number related to housing. As Carron said, it is difficult sometimes to see those poor people but our statistics bear out that they do exist and they can be hard to access. As I say, we are particularly finding that clients are affected by closures of Jobcentre Plus and other local support. In terms of resourcing, we are also very concerned about the use of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation because we do not think it identifies the hard to reach people in remote rural areas and a look needs to be given to that as it is used as a way of identifying where resources are going to go. We do not think that is appropriate for remote rural areas. The other quick issue to mention perhaps is the possibility of looking at discretionary travel passes for people with disabilities. At the moment only about one-fifth of CAB clients with disabilities have those discretionary passes, and it could make a significant difference to them if more of them have those. Similarly, access to financial support for fuel expenditure for people with disabilities who are aged under 60 in our view would be something worth considering. Just to reiterate many of the issues we come across are ones you will have heard about yesterday and from other witnesses today.

  Q44  Chairman: Thank you. There are a number of factors contributing towards poverty, but in your view what is the single biggest factor contributing to poverty in the Highlands?

  Ms Greer: I think our evidence would suggest low income for a number of different reasons. If you look at the statistics for the clients coming to CABs, as I say, by far and away the biggest number are to do with welfare benefits, which suggests issues to do with income.

  Ms McDiarmid: I would agree, it is the nature of the rural economy where average pay in the Highland is 91% of the Scottish average and 86% of the UK average, but also a higher rate of part-time and seasonal working.

  Q45  Mr Walker: Can I pick you up on that. When we were going to do poverty in the Highlands and heard about the disparity in wages, I got frightfully concerned. Then when you hear it is 86% of the UK average I am less concerned when you factor in the cost of housing in parts of the east of England and the Midlands. Despite the growth in the economy over here the housing costs are significantly lower than they are in large parts of England. Really an income of 86% superficially does not seem that big a deal. You could argue that a lot of people would be a lot better off than a lot of their contemporaries in the east of England, the Midlands, earning significantly more. That 86% masks a lot of people who are earning a great deal less because we have sat in some rooms on this visit where you have had a couple of GPs sitting in the room with you and, of course, that significantly skews average earnings in the room by tens if not twenties of thousands. Really, the 86% is almost a red herring. Where are the greatest disparities in earnings in the Highlands? What communities really are struggling, and what would be the differentials between that 86% and the reality of their daily annual incomes? Do you understand what I am saying?

  Ms McDiarmid: Yes. It is not possible to say, "This community is more disadvantaged or poorer than another", because in a rural setting you have rich and poor people living next door to each other. You have to view the landscape differently in trying to understand rural poverty. The issue about house prices is an interesting one. I would agree that generally house prices tend to be lower, but in some communities within Highland, particularly those on the West Coast, very attractive communities and very appealing for people to move in to retire there who can afford the houses, house prices are entirely out of the reach of local people who could be working in seasonal jobs only or are on very low incomes. Those people are having to leave those communities because they cannot afford to stay there, they cannot afford to compete in a market where houses are sold to people who are retired moving into the area or they are sold because they have B&B potential.

  Q46  Mr Walker: That is the same across the UK, that is just not cued into the Highlands. If you go to Cornwall, to Devon, anywhere, that is an issue. House pricing is an issue for many young people and many people of all age groups, how do they access the housing market? That in itself is something which I do not think is unique to the Highlands. I am still concerned as to why you cannot identify rural pockets of poverty. We went to Bonar Bridge and when I mentioned this 86% I was nearly lynched by the audience: "What, we are earning £18,800, of course we are not earning anything like £18,800 a year". I was nearly lynched by them. I had to say, "These are figures not from me but from Scottish Enterprise and the National Statistics Office". Their view is that the vast majority of people in Bonar Bridge are earning significantly less than 86% of the national average. Can you give me an indication of what the average wage of Bonar Bridge is compared with the national average?

  Ms McDiarmid: That information is not available.

  Q47  Mr Walker: Why is it not available? Do you not collect it?

  Ms McDiarmid: The source of information we use for that is the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings and those figures relate to 2005, it is not designed to look at that level.

  Q48  Mr Walker: So it is the 86%?

  Ms McDiarmid: The council has asked for a long time to be able to have information on incomes, possibly through Inland Revenue. That information has not been made available for social policy purposes and it is a real gap in our understanding.

  Q49  Mr Walker: I bet it is.

  Ms McDiarmid: We have to use what is available to us. In terms of trying to identify communities, the Government statistics this year from the 2006 Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation has quantified that there are nearly 24,000 income deprived people living in Highland, that is the Government's figures, but 84% of that number are located outwith the areas where multiple deprivation is concentrated. For example, in applying policy across Scotland, the Index of Multiple Deprivation has been used to target resources at the 15% most deprived communities. When we look at that figure for Highland, 84% of income deprived are outwith those communities, so it is much more dispersed because their settlement pattern is dispersed and diffuse.

  Q50  Danny Alexander: I think this is a very important point which both you and Ms Greer also made. If the formula that is used to assess deprivation is concentrating on targeting funds towards poverty in a geographical concentration then the way in which poverty exists in the Highlands and Islands is not going to be addressed by that funding formula.

  Ms McDiarmid: Absolutely.

  Ms Greer: That is exactly it.

  Q51  Danny Alexander: This may be a particular question for the council because I am sure this is a question on which you are in regular discussions with the Scottish Executive about, for example. Are there other features of poverty in the Highlands and Islands that you think can be taken into account in those calculations to ensure that while not in any way wishing to take away from the serious problems which exist in urban communities where geographical concentrations of poverty are much easier to identify, a fair share of funds to help address poverty could be made much more available where poverty exists in this very spread out and dispersed way?

  Ms McDiarmid: Yes. I have to say, the Index which was revised this year did take into account better information in terms of access to services and we were very grateful for that. However, one key indicator of poverty is fuel poverty and that is not included at all in the Index. Within the Index there is a housing domain which looks at different housing features, but fuel poverty is not included. Fuel poverty is much more prevalent in rural Scotland than the rest of Scotland.

  Q52  Danny Alexander: It seems utterly astonishing that fuel poverty is not included in a formula which is used to allocate funds to tackle poverty. That seems utterly bizarre. Is there a reason you have been given for that?

  Ms McDiarmid: The reason we have been given is that the information is not available at the data zone level, but we have good information on fuel poverty from the Scottish House Condition Survey. For example, the last survey in 2003 identified that one in five households in Highland were in fuel poverty. Fuel poverty is defined as if a household spends more than 10% of its income on household fuel. Fuel poverty affects vulnerable people disproportionately, so older people, people who have a disability who may be at home or families with children who need the heating on all the time are disproportionately affected. One in three of the pensioner households in Highland at that time were regarded as being in fuel poverty. Since then electricity prices have gone up by over 60% and oil prices and gas prices have risen, so we can only assume that is a real underestimate of the prevalence of fuel poverty in the Highlands.

  Q53  Chairman: Do you not think it is important to identify the pockets which are the most deprived areas? I will give you one example. In my own constituency, which I represented until last year, Pollokshaws, was the most deprived area in my constituency, but when the statistics came from the council, because one of the rich areas was connected with this pocket, all of the figures were high in terms of employment and earnings but then we questioned the council, "Why do you not do the survey specifically for this pocket?" and that was the most deprived area in Glasgow. Obviously if you want to tackle poverty in those pockets which are the most deprived then you have to have figures for that particular pocket.

  Ms McDiarmid: There is absolutely no denying the need to tackle concentrations of multiple deprivation, however our point is that there is more than one geography of poverty. In rural communities poverty is placed differently because of the settlement pattern. 40% of our population in Highland live within communities of less than 1,000 people. That is a massive proportion of our population living in dispersed and diffuse communities. You cannot identify concentrations of poverty if your population is not concentrated.

  Q54  Mr Davidson: Can you identify individuals? What are you doing at the moment to target council services at poor people?

  Ms McDiarmid: A number of things. There are universal services obviously which the council provides, including our education service.

  Q55  Mr Davidson: I understand that.

  Ms McDiarmid: Specific services around fuel poverty, the council has got its own housing stock, it has a programme of warm and dry improvements where the majority of its capital funding is invested. For example, last year over five million pounds was used to bring energy efficiency improvements to around 1,000 homes.

  Q56  Mr Davidson: Is that only on poor people's homes?

  Ms McDiarmid: That is on council houses.

  Q57  Mr Davidson: No, the point I am making to you is what are you doing specifically targeted at poor people, these poor people who are dispersed? What in particular do you do for them?

  Ms McDiarmid: In terms of council housing we focus our improvements on the lowest energy efficiency.

  Q58  Mr Davidson: That is the house, you are targeting that at the house and there might be five earners living in the house, so that particular house will not necessarily be occupied by somebody who is poor because you are doing a street.

  Ms McDiarmid: Generally they will be poorer than home owners.

  Q59  Mr Davidson: In general but not necessarily.

  Ms McDiarmid: Other things are to improve rural transport.


35   Note from witness: Shucksmith, M (2000) `Exclusive Countryside? Social Inclusion and regeneration in rural areas, Joseph Rowntree Foundation at www.jrf.org.uk Back

36   Note from witness: see Shucksmith, 2000. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 20 December 2007