Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


Memorandum from London First (PPP 07)

  London First is a business membership organisation whose mission is to make London the best city in the world in which to do business. London First delivers its activities with the support of 300 of the capital's major businesses, representing approximately a quarter of London's GDP, from key sectors such as financial, professional services, property, ICT, creative industries, hospitality and retail. We also represent the interests of all of London's higher education institutions as well as many of the further education colleges.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF LONDON FIRST POSITION:

    —  London's success is critical to UK prosperity and dependent on sustained investment in the Tube system.

    —  Investment in the next major phase of capacity increase must be safeguarded.

    —  Reliability on the worse performing lines must be improved.

    —  The needs of the business community must be considered when planning the extensive upgrade works.

    —  Contracts that replace Metronet BCV and Metronet SSL must secure the forward programme.

LONDON'S SUCCESS IS CRITICAL TO UK PROSPERITY AND DEPENDENT ON SUSTAINED INVESTMENT IN THE TUBE SYSTEM

  1.  London is the most highly productive region in the UK, with GVA per head (on a workplace basis) 53% above the national average (ONS, GLA 2007). Increasing employment in the central business cluster adds not only the value of these extra jobs, but increases the productivity of existing workers—the agglomeration effect. With 12.4% of the UK population, London produced 20% of GDP growth between 1994 and 2004. London also contributes up to £20 billion more in taxes than it receives from the Exchequer (Oxford Economic Forecasting November 2005).

  2.  The strength of London's economy—and that of the UK—depends on its success as a world city. Foreign-owned companies are responsible for 14% of employment in London. The attractiveness of London for foreign investment also benefits the rest of the UK. A survey of inward investors in 2002 showed almost 60% of companies surveyed planned to expand their operations to other parts of the UK. Between 2000 and 2004 London was responsible for 39% of export growth. With the UK increasingly in deficit as a net importer of goods, the export success of key service sectors in London allows the country as a whole to buy goods from across the world.

  3.  London's continued productivity and prosperity depend on two key factors—investment in transport and its ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilled individuals. This continual growth is not constrained by domestic growth parameters but, instead, potentially linked to the growth of the global economy. It can also, however, take place in one of the other global economic centres.

  4.  Around three million people rely on the Tube every day. London's employers, workers, visitors and customers depend on it to keep the capital moving. For businesses, a safe, clean reliable Tube is a necessity. Sustaining the tube modernisation programme, and finding the funding to do so, is crucial to the future prosperity of London. The PPP has allowed investment to be committed on a scale not seen before; while substantial progress has been made, that commitment must not be allowed to falter.

INVESTMENT IN THE NEXT MAJOR PHASE OF CAPACITY INCREASE MUST BE SAFEGUARDED

  5.  There is no dispute about the forecasts for the growth of population in London. Whereas the new homes needed to house 900,000 more people by 2025 will be spread around London, with the majority to the east, new jobs will be heavily concentrated in financial and business services in the central areas. The effect will be a huge increase in transport demand on an already overloaded system. We welcome the Government's commitment to funding of Crossrail, but understand that the scheme's earliest opening date is 2017. On current plans, overcrowding on rail and Tube lines will double by 2016, which will in turn cause greater delays and breakdown.

  6.  This is not just a problem for over-stretched transport operators and disgruntled commuters. It is a threat to the growth and competitiveness of London's—and the UK's—economy. Whereas population increase is likely to happen anyway, the potential for 440,000 new jobs in financial and business services will not be realised if transport into the central areas is full. This sector cannot grow without increased transport capacity, including Phase 2 of the tube modernisation programme.

  7.  Phase 2 of the tube upgrade programme will need to increase capacity to accommodate growth and reduce overcrowding. Most of the 28.5% planned increase in capacity is due in this phase, including upgrading the Northern, Victoria, Metropolitan and Piccadilly Lines. In addition, Phase 2 will need to:

    —  Put in place high visibility safety and security measures.

    —  See the upgrade of stations such as Victoria.

    —  Introduce a tunnel cooling system, which may be essential if the planned capacity increases are to be realised.

  Given the back-end loading of Phase 1 of the PPP and provision for inflation, there will need to be a substantial increase for Phase 2 in cash terms.

RELIABILITY ON THE WORSE PERFORMING LINES MUST BE IMPROVED

  8.  While it is not possible at present to anticipate negotiations over roll-forward of the PPP contracts from 2010, Phase 2 will need to cover renewing outworn assets in order to maintain and improve reliability. Lost Customer Hours—a key PPP measure of availability—saw an improvement across the network of less than half a percent last year.[27]

THE NEEDS OF THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY MUST BE CONSIDERED WHEN PLANNING THE EXTENSIVE UPGRADE WORKS

  9.  We welcome the work London Underground (LU) has done in the life of the PPP contracts to improve dialogue with the business community and exchange long-term, strategic discussions around essential tube closures. The Tube User Forum offers the regular opportunity to provide for and predict business needs, and thereby minimise the negative effect of closures on London's economy.

CONTRACTS THAT REPLACE METRONET BCV AND METRONET SSL MUST SECURE THE FORWARD PROGRAMME

  10.  We believe Metronet Rail BCV & SSL must emerge from administration at the earliest possible moment, and mid-January 2008 at the latest. On that basis, there are good arguments for Transport for London (TfL) taking on Metronet's assets in the short term, and perhaps in the longer term for LU bringing day-to-day maintenance in-house and contracting out packages of upgrading work. However, this model must be backed up by sufficient expertise in systems integration and contract management in order to be successful, as the upgrading work will itself be vulnerable to changes in funding.

  11.  The greatest value of the PPP is that it commits LU to a programme. For Tube Lines this is fixed until 2010, and while the terms of its roll forward for another 7½ years will be subject to negotiation, once the contract is signed the programme will be fixed. TfL may be able to parcel up upgrading contracts so as to lock in the forward programme, but this could require a large number of long-term contracts to be let at once. If contract-letting is phased over several years there exists the scope for delaying work, for example to make good a funding gap. Such a delay must not be exploited to the detriment of the vital modernisation programme currently enabled by the Tube PPP.

  12.  LU's project management capacity must avoid a scenario in which the upgrade programme becomes subject to the kind of spending pressures seen in the 1990s, when over-spends on the Jubilee line extension were clawed back from funding intended for the core Tube network. Whatever form the PPP contracts take, they must lock in the forward programme and consign to history the years of underinvestment that have plagued London's Tube.

October 2007







27   2006-07 compared to 2005-06-Network LCH (LU) [unpublished]. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 25 January 2008