Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


Memorandum from Freight Transport Association (FTA) (RS 20)

INTRODUCTION

  1.  Freight Transport Association represents the freight transport interests of businesses throughout the UK. Its members range from small and medium size enterprises to multi-national public companies and are involved in all modes of transport. FTA members operate over 200,000 heavy goods vehicles, about half the UK fleet, are responsible for 90% of freight moved by rail and 70% of goods shipped by sea and air. This unique multi modal mandate enables FTA to speak authoritatively on all aspects of freight based on the broader transport needs of industry in the economy.

BACKGROUND

  2.  Good progress is being made in road traffic accident reduction in the UK. The Government appears to be on course to meet its target for reducing the number of people killed or seriously injured in road accidents by 40% in 2010 compared to the baseline period of 1994-98. However, the rate of casualty reduction slowed markedly in 2006 to just 0.6%. If this lower rate of decline persisted, the casualty reduction target would be missed. The targets to reduce child casualties and slight injuries have already been achieved.

SUMMARY OF PROGRESS AGAINST SAFETY STRATEGY KPIs
Casualty reduction indicator Target (reduction from 1994-98 baseline) % change 1994-98 baseline to 2006 Progress needed by 2010
Number of people killed or seriously injured -40% by 2010-33-7%
Number of children killed or seriously injured -50% by 2010-52None
Number of slight injuries per 100 million vehicle km -10% by 2010-28None


Source: Road Casualties Great Britain 2006


  3.  The frequency of accidents is falling for all road user groups—whether the measure used is killed and serious injury accidents or slight accidents. Factors influencing this reduction include vehicle design and safety features, traffic management and road user behaviour.

  4.  For HGV operators appropriate road safety policy make good business sense. Minimising the number of accidents and their severity means costly downtime linked to vehicles and drivers being off the road can be minimised.

SUMMARY OF PROGRESS BY VEHICLE TYPE AND SEVERITY OF ACCIDENT: % CHANGE 1994-98 BASELINE TO 2006
User groupKilled/Seriously injured Slight All
Pedestrians (rate per 100,000 of population) -42-34-36
Cyclists (rate per 100 million vehicle km) -42-41-42
Car (rate of 100 million vehicle km)-45 -22-25
HGV (rate per 100 million vehicle km)-40 -30-32
Bus and coach (rate per 100 million vehicle km) -45-29-30
Motorcyclist (rate per 100 million vehicle km) -25-28-27


Question 1  To what extent have targets for casualty reduction been a useful tool for focusing professional activity?

  5.  Targets for road accident casualty reduction have provided a context for:

    Enforcement priorities

    —  Maintaining the momentum and focus of the work of Traffic Commissioners and VOSA on road worthiness inspections and traffic enforcement—for example drivers hours rules which aim to improve road safety by preventing professional drivers driving for longer than is safe to do so. Proposals in the draft Local Transport Bill included plans to increase the focus of Traffic Commissioners on bus punctuality issues. FTA rejected these plans, which were subsequently dropped, on the basis that it would result on a detrimental effect on compliance in the goods vehicle sector.

    —  Setting the priorities of police traffic enforcement activities and accident investigation,

    Highways Authority initiatives

    —  Distribution by VOSA of fresnel lenses at UK ports to left-hand-drive foreign hgvs has been prompted by the need to tackle growing incidents of "side swipe" accidents. Highways Agency report that sideswipe accidents dropped by about 59% during the pilot period.

    —  Transport for London is planning to issue redesigned fresnel lenses free of charge to operators in 2008 for use by hgvs in urban environments to improve visibility of cyclists and other vulnerable road users.

    —  Transport for London's Freight Unit is working closely with the FTA and other industry stakeholders to develop a Freight Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS). The scheme includes industry working with the TfL-funded Commercial Vehicle Education Unit to promote awareness of occupational road risk and develop in-house preventative strategies for operators.

    —  The Greater London Authority (GLA) has launched a "Share the Road" campaign in London enabling road user stakeholders to gain a shared understanding of the different needs of road users with the common aim of accident reduction.

    Legislative developments

    —  Legislation focussed on reducing road accident risk and lessening road accident severity has continually evolved, with new offences developed (such as the ban on the use of hand-held mobile phones whilst driving) and tougher penalties introduced.

    —  There has been a greater safety focus for the instruction and testing of new drivers, additional test time has been introduced as well as extra questions in the theory test.

    Academic research

    —  The risks of sleep deprivation and their link to occupational road risk is an important stream of academic research and industry best practice advice. The University of Loughborough is a leading centre for this research and FTA uses its staff and findings in providing advice for operators and drivers.

  6.  Targets for casualty reduction also provide a context for industry road safety initiatives, for example:

    —  Use of "Well Driven?" as a code of practice for professional drivers and a mechanism for other motorists to feedback positive and negative experiences of hgv driving.

    —  Development of industry accident benchmarking initiatives as a mechanism for individual companies to identifying opportunities for improvement and report performance in a consistent way as a corporate social responsibility indicator.

    —  Use of accident monitoring/accident records used as a KPI in driver reward.

    —  Incorporation into wider workplace transport safety policies and procedures.

    —  Awareness raising by the industry for other road users—such as "If you can't see my mirrors then I can't see you" stickers on the rear of HGVs.

Question 2  What further measures need to be adopted to reduce deaths and injuries arising from drinking and driving?

  7.  The Government could encourage the wider adoption by companies of blood alcohol limits below the UK minimum threshold of 80 milligrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood, or indeed zero-alcohol policies for professional drivers, supported by in-company random checks. However, professional drivers should not be singled out as a road user group for mandatory lower blood alcohol limits or a zero-alcohol limits.

Question 3  How does GB compare to other EU countries in its approach to reducing deaths and injuries?

  8.  FTA's response to Q1 highlights the role road safety targets in Great Britain have had in setting enforcement priorities, compliance standards and conditioning the approach taken to road safety for operators of commercial vehicle fleets. The strong road safety culture among UK commercial operators relative to foreign carriers is illustrated by the following table taken from the Summary of Evidence from the joint FTA/RHA/HM Treasury Haulage Industry Task Group, which was published in December 2006.

RATIO OF VEHICLES/DRIVERS RECEIVING PROHIBITIONS AT VOSA CHECKS
TARGETED CHECKS   RANDOM CHECKS
Type of offenceGB Non-GBGB Non-GB
Drivers Hours6.7%20.8% 3.4%14%
Roadworthiness (all)23% 31.5%



NB:   Targeted checks are made using intelligence-based information. This data is more comprehensive for UK operator as it includes an operators vehicle test history as well as VOSA encounters at the roadside. The data for non UK vehicles is based only on the operators roadside encounter history with VOSA.


Question 6  What further policies, not already widely used, might be considered for adoption and what evidence is there for their success?

  9.  EU Drivers' hours rules require that drivers stop for regular rest breaks and not drive for more than 4.5 hours at any one stretch on the ground of road safety. In recent years a number of dedicated truck parking areas and laybys used regularly by trucks have closed. Reduced availability of driver facilities, combined with congestion creating less predictable journey times on the motorway and trunk road network and reductions in flexibility on the length of breaks resulting from an overhaul of EU drivers' hours rules from 11 April 2007 means operators (especially in London and the South East of England) have difficulty in adhering to the rules.

  10.  In October 2007 FTA gathered its members' views on how the recent closures of truckstops in the UK (such as the Alconbury truckstop on the A14 near Cambridge and Truckworld in Essex) have impacted on their operations. 1 in 7 operators have experienced difficulty with adhering to legally required drivers' hours rules on breaks when drivers have nowhere to stop and take the required breaks.

  11.  FTA believes that there should be a coherent national strategy for driver facilities and that the responsible highways authority (whether that is the Highways Agency or a local authority) provides regularly spaced facilities for hgv drivers on major freight routes. These include the motorway network, key interurban corridors such as the A34 and A66 and port access routes such as the A14 and A12.

Question 7  What should be the priorities for government in considering further targets for casualty reduction beyond 2010?

  12.  Future targets for road casualty reduction should continue to be generic in their application to road users. FTA believes that professional drivers should not be singled out as a target group in order to deliver an "easy win".

  13.  The road freight sector has made significant improvements in its accident record. Government should build on these initiatives through:

    Targeted enforcement

    Enforcement Authorities should focus their enforce activities against those operators with the poorest safety record. Companies that have an established culture of safety and compliance should benefit from lighter touch enforcement.

    Safety best practice

    Early adopters of safety best practice should be encouraged and supported, where appropriate, through grants or vehicle. Examples of vehicle safety features which should be encouraged includes:

    —  electronic vehicle stability control;

    —  improved vehicle lighting or fitment of reflective tape for enhanced visibility at night; and

    —  front and rear underrun and sideguards that go beyond legal requirements.

    Encouraging hgvs to use motorways

    Motorways remain much safer than rural trunk roads (their "all severity" rate of 8 accidents per 100 million vehicle kilometres compares to 23 accidents per 100 million vehicle kilometres for rural trunk roads). Motorways should be the route of choice for operators. To ensure this is the case they must deliver journey time reliability. The most effective measure to relieve congestion on heavily trafficked motorway routes is through adding additional lanes. Whilst the Highway Agency's use of technology and effective incident management to get more capacity out of the existing network by improving traffic flow is welcome, this cannot be a substitute for widening. Importantly, as Active Traffic Management, particularly hard should running, is rolled out to other parts of the network it must meet the rigorous safety standards applied to pilot schemes.

    Road safety education

    Education aimed at raising safety consciousness and initiatives to modify behaviour should be targeted at vulnerable groups and situations where the risk of accidents is high should be the main targets. Issues of particular relevance to hgvs include:

    —  Cyclists:

        —  How to behave around hgvs. In particular:

  —  Positioning at red traffic lights.

  —  Anticipating HGV maneoveres at left hand turns.

        —  Being seen at night/in times where visibility is poor.

    —  Highway Code:

        —  Inclusion of awareness of trucks in the Highway Code and how motorists should manoeuvre and position themselves on the road with trucks in mind (for example awareness of hgv cut-ins at roundabouts and rear view limitations for HGVs.

    —  Driving test:

        —  Additional information to be included in the driving test on motorway driving. This should include:

  —  Use of the middle lane of motorways.

  —  Safe practice for overtaking lorries—don't sit alongside lorries travelling at the same   speed. Either stay behind in the mirror's view or get in front.

    —  Ongoing professional development for drivers:

        —  The EU's Driver CPC qualification is a ongoing training programme requiring professional drivers to undertake 35 hours of training over five years. A key element to the Driver CPC syllabus is road safety.

February 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 29 October 2008