Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


Memorandum from RAC (RS 30)

ABOUT RAC

  1.  RAC provides a comprehensive range of motoring and vehicle services for both consumers and businesses. These range from those learning to drive with BSM, people who enjoy peace of mind with RAC breakdown cover and to customers utilising HPI for vehicle history checks. RAC is part of Aviva, the world's fifth-largest insurance group and the biggest in the UK, where it operates under the Norwich Union brand.

  2.  Since 1988 the RAC has produced an annual research publication, known as the Report on Motoring (previously known as the Lex Report on Motoring), which reports motorists' views of the issues of most relevance to drivers in the UK today. In 2007, the focus of the Report on Motoring was on driving and safety. The Report is based on an extensive programme of specially-commissioned research amongst British motorists. In 2007, a total of 2,029 face-to-face interviews were carried out, and a further nine focus group discussions were held amongst particular interest groups.

  3.  RAC welcomes the opportunity to submit evidence to the Committee relating to road safety, and share with you some of our findings. The 2007 Report on Motoring demonstrated that road safety and the reduction of casualties and fatalities on our roads features higher on the list of Britain's motorists than any other issue.

  4.  Furthermore, the Report indicated that driving and safety is by far the greatest concern for the vast majority of motorists ahead of congestion, the cost of motoring, the number of cars on the road and the environment. The concerns motorists have about driving safely are overwhelmingly about the behaviours of other motorists.

To what extent have targets for casualty reduction been a useful tool for focusing professional activity?

  5.  RAC welcomes the Government's commitment to reducing the number of casualties and deaths on our roads; however we remain concerned at the continuing high level. In 2005, Department for Transport statistics[87] show there were 3,201 deaths and 28,954 serious injuries on our roads. Whilst the trend in deaths and casualties is declining, the rate of this decline appears to be slowing year-on-year.

  6.  The UK's targets for reducing the number of fatalities differ from the Swedish model, where in 1997 they adopted a "zero tolerance" approach which aims to have no road deaths. In our research for the 2007 Report on Motoring, drivers were informed that there were 3,201 deaths on UK roads each year and were asked how acceptable they thought a policy of "zero fatalities", similar to the Swedish approach, would be in this country.

  7.  Our research demonstrated that a majority (54%) of Britain's motorists would, in principle, support a policy of "zero fatalities" although, this support is strongly tempered by scepticism about how "realistic" such a policy would be. What did become apparent however, is that 59% of motorists would support a more ambitious national target that aims for a sizeable reduction in road deaths.

What further measures need to be adopted to reduce deaths and injuries arising from drinking and driving?

  8.  Department for Transport statistics[88] show that in 2005 car drivers over the alcohol limit were involved in 6% of all casualties and 17% of all deaths on our roads. Drinking and driving killed or seriously injured 2,660 people, and injured a further 12,740. Nearly 1 in 6 of all deaths on Britain's roads involve drivers who are over the legal alcohol limit.

  9.  RAC would support a reduction in the UK drink-drive limit to 50 mg per 100 ml of blood in line with other EU countries. In addition, RAC believes such a reduction should be accompanied by increased detection and continued focus on the most serious offenders.

  10.  RAC supports education measures to remind drivers what the limit means in practice and to help them understand "morning after motoring" when it might be some time since the driver last consumed a drink.

  11.  RAC also welcomes proposals to make roadside breath tests admissible in court, without the need for supporting blood test results, to save police time and provide a more instant deterrent to drivers.

  12.  RAC supports further investigation into the benefits and applications of new technology such as "alcolocks", as a deterrent to repeat offenders.

  13.  Driving under the influence of alcohol is a long-standing and well-documented problem. Drug-driving receives less public attention but is of no less concern and RAC believes drug driving is as prevalent and dangerous as drink driving. The current roadside "Field Impairment Test" includes asking drivers to put their finger to their nose; stand on one leg; and count to 30. Together with an examination of the pupil in the eye the police officer determines if drug-driving has taken place. RAC does not believe that this is scientifically reliable and calls for more robust tests to be developed.

  14.  In the 2007 Report on Motoring, motorists were asked what concerns them most about their driving safety. Of greatest concern to motorists were other motorists under the influence of illegal drugs (76%), and other motorists driving over the legal alcohol limit (74%).

  15.  The research also tested the acceptability to motorists of a range of safety initiatives. The evidence showed resounding support in favour of initiatives to tackle drink driving. The essential message was that drivers will accept lowering the drink-drive limit to 50 mg of alcohol per 100 ml of blood (69%); an increase in random breath testing (71%); the "naming and shaming" of convicted drink/drug drivers (73%); and, the installation of "alcolocks" to test driver's breath before the engine starts (67%). Our research showed that motorists would accept the inconvenience that such measures would have on the law abiding majority, as long as they are effective in combating drink driving.

Are there specific blockages caused by shortages of appropriately trained and skilled staff?

  16.  People who drive for work and drivers who habitually speed are both more likely to say they feel very safe on today's roads but, for differing reasons, both are more at risk than the average motorist.

  17.  Research by the Transport Research Laboratory has shown that, even taking into account their higher mileage; people who drive for work have up to 50% more accidents than private motorists. RAC therefore believes that, whilst regular training for all drivers should be encouraged, employers have a particularly important role to play in helping to reduce the number of accidents related to those driving on company business.

  18.  Research for the 2007 Report on Motoring tested company car drivers about whether their employers undertake basic checks routinely. The research showed that 56% had the validity of their driving licence checked annually; 56% were provided with guidance of what to do in the event of a crash; 42% were provided with a policy or guidance for driving whilst at work; and, 33% were provided with realistic journey planning to include adequate rest periods.

What further policies, not already widely used, might be considered for adoption and what evidence there is for their success?

  19.  The Department for Transport acknowledges[89] that there are a number of groups who remain more at risk on the roads—these include young drivers and those who drive for work. In addition, the Department for Transport's research highlights some key areas for concern—these include drink driving and speeding.

  20.  RAC believes a lifelong learning approach is needed for driver education. Driving is a skill for life and RAC therefore calls on Government to formalise this by including driver education in the national curriculum. Young people are taught about responsible attitudes to sexual relations and alcohol consumption, but despite the fact most go on to drive, they are not taught about safe and responsible attitudes to driving. The 2007 Report on Motoring found that young drivers see the need to be better prepared before they are allowed to drive and list their top three priorities as learning more about "safe driving" at school (58%); more emphasis on "teaching to drive safely" (37%); and, better preparation for modern driving (30%). The over-riding message emerging from the research was that Britain's motorists want, and would accept, greater measures to help prepare young people for driving and to help them drive safely.

  21.  RAC is calling for a life-long approach to driver education to ensure that all drivers are equipped to deal with modern road and traffic conditions. The realities of driving today are very different to the conditions back in, and prior to, the 1980's, when 62% of today's motorists passed their test. Today, cars are more powerful, complex, have more equipment, and traffic conditions are more demanding; for example, our roads are more congested.

  22.  The Report on Motoring 2007 tested various measures which would encourage a lifelong learning approach to driving for their level of acceptability with today's motorists. Our research showed that 42% of drivers supported periodical re-testing with compulsory re-training for those who failed; 51% of drivers supported re-testing for all drivers over the age of 65, with periodical re-testing thereafter; and, 79% of drivers supported regular medical checks for elderly drivers.

  23.  Statistics from the Department for Transport[90] show that whilst speeding is identified as a "contributory factor" in 15% of all accidents, this increases to 26% in the case of all fatal accidents, demonstrating that speed does kill. However, speeding is often considered socially acceptable. Research for the 2007 Report on Motoring demonstrated that 47% of motorists admit to driving significantly above the speed limit in built-up areas and 54% admit to doing so on motorways.

What should be the priorities for government in considering further targets for casualty reduction beyond 2010?

  24.  RAC believes the Government needs to set realistic and achievable targets for casualty reduction beyond 2010. Where appropriate, RAC believes that national targets should be separated into specific localised targets that reflect local concerns and priorities.

  25.  RAC believes there needs to be a lifelong approach to learning to drive, with a more prominent and integrated system equipping people with the skills they need to drive safely throughout their lives. Statistics show that young drivers are at greatest risk, and as such RAC calls for the Government to include driver education as part of the national curriculum.

  26.  In relation to combating drink driving, RAC would support random breath testing and a reduction in the drink-drive limit to be in line with other EU countries.

  27.  The 2007 Report on Motoring concluded that drivers need help to better understand the inherent risk in how they drive. The research showed that motorists would like ongoing education and training combined with proportionate and effective enforcement to become safer drivers, but ultimately, that drivers need to take personal responsibility. RAC believes that all motoring organisations have a role to play in helping motorists achieve this and become safer drivers.

February 2008







87   Road Casualties in Great Britain in 2005, Department for Transport. Back

88   Road Casualties in Great Britain in 2005, Department for Transport. Back

89   Department for Transport, "Tomorrow's roads-safer for everyone", February 2007. Back

90   Road Casualties in Great Britain in 2005, Department for Transport. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 29 October 2008