Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


Memorandum from esure (RS 58)

  Firstly, I would like to provide some background information on esure. We were founded in 2001 as a joint venture between Peter Wood, the entrepreneur who launched Direct Line in the 1980s, and HBOS. esure became the fastest growing insurer ever in 2005 when it gained over 1 million customers just four years after starting trading. The company went on to launch the revolutionary brand Sheilas' Wheels, marketed primarily at female drivers, in 2005 which has taken on over a quarter of a million customers in just two years.

  esure is particularly concerned about the problem of high accident rates among young drivers. From an insurance perspective, unless statistics improve, esure believes that the average 17 year old driver is going to find it hard to find affordable insurance before long. Currently, premiums are very high for young drivers reflecting their disproportionate likelihood both of claiming and of making more expensive claims—often involving injury to passengers. This in turn means that increasingly only the largest insurers are able to underwrite young drivers and even those that do may have to increase premiums even more in order to properly reflect increasing risk. Consequently, esure believes that policies are required to reduce this risk if insurance is to remain affordable for young drivers.

  We have been actively involved in supporting road safety education seminars in Surrey for the past four years. The Safe Drive Stay Alive seminars are attended by all "A" level students in the area with the aim of educating them forcefully about the dangers of irresponsible driving before they even take to the roads. The seminars screen a filmed recreation of a real life road traffic accident where a local young person was killed and the audience is subsequently addressed by each of the emergency services who attended the scene of that particular accident as well as other victims of irresponsible and dangerous driving.

  esure has also been monitoring the Government's Motoring Offences and Breath Test statistics for a similar length of time and, while the Committee praises the "considerable progress" made in reducing the scale of deaths and injuries on the roads of Great Britain since 2000, our analysis of those statistics has shown that there has been absolutely no progress in tackling the disproportionate amount of serious motoring convictions involving young male drivers.

  The last Motoring Offences and Breath Test statistics to be published (2005) found that male drivers aged between 17 and 20 years old make up 32.2% of all convictions for dangerous driving offences despite only representing around 3% of the UK driving population. The equivalent figure for women of the same age is just 0.5%. esure believes that tackling this high risk group should be a priority for road safety policy in the future and that the Government should place as much emphasis on the causes of poor driver behaviour as is currently being given to tackling a perceived lack of driving skills among this group.

  Attached as appendix 1[92] is an advance copy of an esure commissioned report called "Sex Differences in Driving and Insurance Risk" written by Professor Geoffrey Beattie of the University of Manchester. It will be published in the next couple of weeks.

  The report concludes that the prevalence of young male drivers in motoring conviction statistics is not because men are less skilled drivers than women, but is instead due to inherent behavioural and hormonal factors, which require further detailed study and a recognition of which must form part of the Government's future road safety policies. The conclusion of the report heavily influences our response, which has been restricted to questions 6 and 7 only. esure does not feel appropriately qualified to answer the other part of the inquiry.

  We very much hope that this submission is of interest to the committee and would be pleased to provide oral evidence to your inquiry should you wish.

What further policies, not already widely used, might be considered for adoption and what evidence there is for their success?

  1.  We believe that the Government should target future road safety policy at the attitudes and behaviours of young male drivers specifically in order to produce the biggest and fastest impact on reducing accidents on British roads.

  2.  esure also feels that tackling a perceived lack of driving skill can only ever be part of the solution to reducing bad driving. We believe that the attitudes and behaviours of young male drivers toward road safety are just as important causal factors of poor driving as any lack of driving ability.

  3.  It is our opinion that, by concentrating only on reform of the current driving test and ignoring driver behaviour, the proposed DSA consultation on driver training and testing will fail to produce a comprehensive solution to the problem.

  4.  We have long held the view that road safety education needs to start before people get behind the wheel of a car. We have therefore recently written to the Road Safety Minister Jim Fitzpatrick MP to encourage the Department for Transport to undertake a thorough review of the way young men view road safety in order to develop government educational programmes aimed specifically at changing the attitudes of young men toward driving before they actually start learning to drive.

What should be the priorities for government in considering further targets for casualty reduction beyond 2010?

  5.  The Government should prioritise road safety policies which specifically tackle the inherent behavioural and hormonal factors which contribute directly to the dangerous risk taking and thrill seeking driving behaviours of young male drivers if there is to be any significant reduction in deaths and injuries on the UK's roads in the future.

  6.  esure's analysis of the Government's annual Motoring Offences and Breath Test statistics demonstrate that the vast majority of people convicted of the most serious driving offences are men and that there has been no progress made in reducing this figure since 2000 (see table below).
Offence Type
Percentage Male
20002001 20022002 20042005
Causing death or bodily harm95 949494 9494
Dangerous Driving9797 979697 97
Driving etc after consuming alcohol or taking drugs 909089 898988
Accident offences8888 888787 87
Unauthorised taking or theft of a motor vehicle 969696 959695
Speed limit offences85 84838282 82


  7.  Within that group it is young men in particular (aged 21 and under) who are hugely disproportionately responsible for the most serious offences and, similarly, there has been no progress made in tackling this problem.
Offence Type
Percentage Male under 21
20002001 20022003 20042005
Causing death or bodily harm24 252424 2526
Dangerous driving3438 353333 33
Driving etc after consuming alcohol or taking drugs 121212 121111
Accident offences2121 222220 19
Unauthorised taking or theft of motor vehicle 676864 636362
Speed limit offences5 4433 3


  8.  94% of convictions for causing death or bodily harm on UK roads are by men and approximately one quarter of those are men under 21 years of age. A staggering 97% of convictions for dangerous driving are men and of those over one-third are men under the age of 21.

  9.  For the most recent year in which statistics are available (2005), male drivers aged between 17 and 20 years old make up 32.2% of all convictions for dangerous driving offences despite only representing around 3% of the UK driving population. The equivalent figure for women of the same age is just 0.5%.

  10.  It is clear that in order to make the biggest and fastest impact on improving road safety in the UK the Government must prioritise men and young men in particular when deciding on future road safety policies.

  11.  Therefore specific policies need to be developed for specific groups and those policies must be based on an understanding of the differences between male and female driving behaviours and the particular driving attitudes of young male drivers.

  12.  The "Sex differences in driving" report (appendix 1) provides evidence from studies around the world which show that differences between male and female drivers in terms of crash rates derive from fundamental differences in specific areas of behaviour and psychological functioning.

February 2008







92   Not printed here. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 29 October 2008