Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


Memorandum from Help the Aged (BBS 04)

  Help the Aged welcomes the opportunity to submit evidence to the House of Commons Transport Committee on the Blue Badge (disabled parking) Reform Strategy. Help the Aged has drawn on our extensive research and experience of working with and talking to older people. Through the Charity's engagement strategy, Vocal Point, all issues older people raise with any member of the Charity are logged anonymously and monitored to feed into the work of the organisation and steer the issues on which we actively lobby and campaign. We also proactively seek older people's opinions on specific topics through focus groups and listening events, as well as liaising with members of Speaking Up For Our Age, a programme which facilitates and supports hundreds of local older people's forums. For this consultation, we also engaged the opinions of our regional development officers who are often involved with older people in local and national consultation.

SUMMARY

    —  Help the Aged welcomes the inquiry into the Blue Badge (disabled parking) Reform Strategy. Public transport remains inaccessible for large numbers of older people and the Blue Badge scheme is therefore of vital importance in maintaining mobility and independence for many older people.

    —  We are very concerned by the narrow eligibility criteria for Blue Badges and feel that any older person receiving Attendance Allowance should automatically be eligible for the Blue Badge scheme.

    —  We recognise that it would be sensible to retain the current three year issuing period, but feel that under no circumstances should this be reduced.

    —  Some Local Authorities no longer issue reminders for Blue Badge schemes and as a result some older people, who have accidentally let their Badge lapse, may be unfairly penalised. We therefore recommend that all Local Authorities be required to issue reminders for the renewal of Badges.

    —  We would be happy for Local Authorities to have greater discretion over the parking concessions they offer, however there must be rigorous guidelines issued to ensure that decision made do not impact negatively on users of the Blue Badge.

    —  It is vital that older people are consulted on decisions about parking concessions, in order to ascertain need amongst this group.

    —  More information should be made automatically available to Blue Badge holders to enable them to use their Blue Badge fully and to understand its limitations.

    —  In addition to the Blue Badge scheme, Help the Aged is calling for greater efforts to improve Community Transport networks, taxi services, and ensure that flexible alternatives to buses are provided. These are vital to ensure that older people who have to give up driving, or lose access to a car through friends, do not become excluded and isolated. Older people will not need to use their own cars, if affordable, accessible, reliable and safe transport is made available.

  Below we offer some comments on key areas of the inquiry.

1.   Should the Assessed Eligibility Criteria be changed and, if so, how?

  1.1  Help the Aged is concerned that the Assessed Eligibility Criteria are too narrowly focused at present. People who become disabled after 65 they are not entitled to Disability Living Allowance (DLA) and are only able to apply for Attendance Allowance, which does not include a mobility component. As a result they are not automatically eligible for a Blue Badge and are forced to rely on discretion. This is blatant age discrimination. We believe that people who are in receipt of Attendance Allowance should automatically be eligible for the Blue Badge scheme.

  1.2  The National Travel Survey has shown that around 45% of people over 70 have difficulty walking and using buses due to limited mobility.[1] Many will therefore be dependant on the Blue Badge Scheme to meet their transport needs.

  1.3  Increases in longevity will inevitably involve a significant increase in the number of "very old drivers". Currently over two million people aged 70 and over hold driving licences in Great Britain—by 2015 this will double to four and a half million, and clearly many of these people will have some form of physical impairment. Statistics show that 38% of people in Great Britain aged 65-74 and 50% of those aged 75+ have a limiting longstanding illness.[2] Currently, men in the UK can expect to live their last 6.7 years with a disability. For women, the average is 8.8 years.[3] The UK can therefore expect many more older disabled drivers in the future.

  1.4  Without access to the Blue Badge scheme many older people will be at risk of isolation and loneliness, which are growing problems in the UK. In 2007 Help the Aged found that 13% of older people felt often or always lonely.[4] The same survey found that 22% of older people were effectively isolated as they needed help to get out and about, but didn't have it.

  1.5  Isolation and loneliness are not necessary effects of the ageing process, but life events associated with older age such as leaving work, health decline and bereavement do put people at greater risk. There is evidence that individuals who have driven their entire life tend to be more isolated in old age when they are forced to stop driving. In a survey on older drivers, a total of 73% reported that they used their car "everyday or most days", and 24% "several times a week".[5]

  1.6  It is clear that for many respondents to this survey, car ownership and driving played a vital role in their lives. Without access to the Blue Badge Scheme, many older drivers would be forced to give up driving and would lose mobility and independence, as these quotations demonstrate:

    "Being disabled through arthritis, my wife and I rely on our car. Driving for both of us is a blessing. We are over four miles from the nearest bus stop, so the car is essential. We have no shop, no post office, no school, no pub. I have stopped driving long journeys, but we are 12 miles from the nearest station".

    "(Being) housebound without a car, and social life reduced to nil, the car is essential to us. (Living without a car) would lead to isolation and depression as kith and kin living long distances away. (It would be) devastating, particularly during cold, wet weather, having to struggle with shopping bags on and off buses, and then walk quite a distance to my own front door".

2.   Should the minimum badge issue period be lowered from the current three years?

  2.1  Most older people who hold a Blue Badge do so on the basis of a long term condition in which they are unlikely to see improvement, therefore in the strictest sense issuing a badge for life would probably be appropriate. However Help the Aged accepts the logic behind the current three year issuing period, to prevent abuse and ensure a properly updated database.

  2.2  However, under no circumstances would we wish to see Blue Badges issued for a shorter period. If the badge issue period were reduced it would not only increase the burden on potentially vulnerable older people, but would also increase the administration costs.

  2.3  Help the Aged is concerned that some Local Authorities no longer issue reminders to Blue Badge holders whose Badges are about to expire. As a result some older people have accidentally let their Badge lapse and been penalised. We therefore recommend that all Local Authorities be required to issue reminders for the renewal of Badges.

3.   Should local authorities have more discretion to vary the yellow-line and on-street parking concessions (eg allowing badge holders to park without charge for more time in some areas and less in others depending on local traffic conditions and disabled access)?

  3.1  Help the Aged would welcome greater flexibility for local authorities to vary parking concessions, as this would allow greater tailoring of provision to the needs of the older people living in the area, but feels that this should only go ahead if backed by rigorous guidelines to ensure that decisions made locally do not impact negatively on users of the Blue Badge.

  3.2  At the moment, older people tell us they often have to modify their plans around where they expect a suitable parking space to be available. In this way the lack of places is restricting the freedom of older people with disabilities. We believe it is vital that older people are consulted to find out more about their needs. This would enable the more efficient distribution of parking concessions.

  3.3  We also believe it is vital that more information is made available to Blue Badge holders to enable them to both use their Blue Badge fully and to understand its limitations.

4.   Should the London Concession (the regulations that exempt the four central London boroughs from the national Blue Badge Scheme) be redrawn so that it is aligned with the London Congestion Charge Zone (recognising that the zone may alter in size)?

  Yes.

5.   Are there any other changes which should be made to the concessions associated with a Blue badge?

  5.1   We believe that more should be done to improve Community Transport networks, taxi services, and ensure that flexible alternatives to the buses are provided. This is vital to ensure that older people do not become excluded and isolated when they stop driving or lose access to a car through a friend or relative. Older people will not need to use their own car, if affordable, accessible, reliable and safe transport is made available.

  5.2  This should be offered in addition to the Blue Badge Scheme, not instead. Many older people feel strongly that they want to keep their cars and continue driving and this free choice should be enabled.

6.   What would be the likely impact of any proposed changes on the number of people holding badges, the availability of disabled parking spaces and on local government administration and costs?

  6.1  The economic costs of failing to support older people's continued mobility are significant. It is absolutely vital that any costs associated with increasing access to Blue Badges for older people are weighed against the cost of losing their contribution as consumers and citizens if their mobility is not enabled.

  6.2  We feel that too much focus has been pinpointed on the abuse of the scheme, and not enough evidence has been placed on the need and the benefit the scheme provides to people who would otherwise be unable to maintain their independence.

  6.3  Flexible alternatives to the bus travel concession should also be viewed as a tactic to offer older people the mobility they require.

February 2008










1   National Travel Survey 2007. Back

2   General Household Survey 2006, table 7.2(b), Office for National Statistics, January 2008. Back

3   Life expectancy (LE), healthy life expectancy (HLE) and disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) at birth and age 65: by country and sex, 2004, ONS, January 2008. Back

4   Spotlight 2007 and "Help Unite Generations" surveys (NOP/ GfK, 2006 and 2007). Back

5   Help the Aged 2008. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 12 June 2008