Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum from TranSys (TPT 19a)

ITSO AND OYSTER—TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION AND ISSUES

INTRODUCTION

  The PRESTIGE Project contract was signed on 14 August 1998 after years of investigatory trials and negotiations. ITSO was formed in December 1998 to develop a specification for an interoperable smartcard. ITSO comprises authorities and operators of each public transport sector, as well as system and equipment suppliers and is supported by the Department of Transport (DfT). Its primary objectives are to:

    —  Develop a specification for an interoperable public transport smartcard across the UK.

    —  Encourage implementation of the specification.

    —  Ensure the confidentiality of data for each party.

    —  Provide open standards to parties wishing to conform to the specification.

ITSO AND OYSTER DIFFERENCES

  ITSO is designed to meet the needs of all UK transport operators and Public Transport Executives (PTEs) without particular emphasis of any one aspect. Oyster is designed explicitly to meet the needs of TfL with performance optimised around the associated business operations. Different methods are employed by ITSO and Oyster in how ticketing functions are delivered:

    —  ITSO joins multiple discrete schemes (Scotland, Cheshire etc) via centralised security management whereas Oyster operates as a single overall scheme.

    —  ITSO is decentralised with multiple card and product issuers and service operators with the associated databases. Oyster operates a single, consolidated scheme database.

    —  ITSO Ltd mandates the security scheme to be applied by ITSO scheme operators, including the supply of the security service and secure modules (but does not take any financial liability). TranSys bears the card security fraud risk for Oyster and uses TranSys designed solutions.

    —  ITSO supports multiple smart card technologies. Oyster cards are currently only issued using a single technology, although the installed readers are capable of being upgraded to read more.

    —  ITSO supports a wide range of ticketing products, including singles, returns, reserved seats, travelcards, loyalty products and a stored value purse. Oyster currently supports zonal travelcards (including the Freedom Pass concession) and the Pay As You Go "ePurse" product.

    —  In ITSO responsibility for managing the operating software and scheme updates is devolved to the schemes who may have to bear the costs for other schemes/PTEs to accommodate any changes required. Oyster scheme updates are controlled through TranSys, who are responsible for managing the system including the end devices.

    —  ITSO was created explicitly to be an open standard. Oyster is not designed as an open standard, due to the fraud liabilities represented by the TranSys PFI model. Information has been restricted to partners integrating Oyster in conjunction with TranSys.

    —  ITSO modifications are processed through a Technical Committee of respective experts (drawn from the ITSO membership) prior to agreement by the wider membership, then DfT and finally ITSO Management Board. Oyster updates are designed and managed by TranSys, in conjunction with TfL.

    —  Settlement and Clearing is outside of the ITSO specification. Oyster supports Settlement and Clearing as part of the scheme design.

  As a consequence of these differences, there are a number of significant challenges presented by the integration of ITSO on Prestige:

    —  ITSO card processing takes significantly longer than for Oyster cards, due to the additional data stored (for full accountability) and security module use.

    —  The prevention of transaction loss requires end-to-end acknowledgement of data transfers.

    —  Larger ITSO transaction sizes (for full accountability) and additional operating data required to support the ITSO functions require greater communication bandwidth and storage capacity within the system.

    —  Additional data transfer will affect operational processes (eg bus driver sign-on times).

    —  TranSys is unable to underwrite performance across all ITSO card types as it cannot control the performance characteristics of cards that are ITSO certified. It is only reasonably possible for TranSys to underwrite performance for an agreed subset of ITSO card types issued on an agreed retailing basis.

    —  The ITSO Specification is continually evolving, creating a constantly moving baseline that needs to be managed and assessed.

ITSO ON PRESTIGE

  The objective of the ITSO on PRESTIGE (IOP) Project is the "acceptance of ITSO-compliant smartcards with a limited range of products by PRESTIGE Validation Devices to make them able to accept ITSO cards".

  A Variation Notice to the existing Ticketing Services Contract (TSC) was issued by TfL to TranSys. It specifies the need for a Design Study that would enable TTL and the Department for Transport (DfT) to authorise the implementation of the IOP Project.

  The Design Study comprises three stages:

    —  Stage One—Scoping Study (completed).

    —  Stage Two—Requirements Analysis (completed[26]).

    —  Stage Three—Programme Definition and Firm Fixed Price Proposal (work-in-progress).

KEY REQUIREMENT

  The overarching statement of requirements is that, "Operationally, there must be no degradation to the current Oyster service as a result of the implementation of ITSO on PRESTIGE":

    —  Operations include passenger gate throughput transaction times, bus driver sign-on times, fares revisions, and the provision of (management) reports, as specified in the TSC.

    —  Degradation refers to all performance measures cited in the TSC (no relief will be given to the terms of the current TSC), the ability of TfL to deliver the Oyster service, and the availability of the Oyster service.

    —  Oyster Service refers to current provision under the TSC or any addenda thereto made by previous variations to the PRESTIGE contract; there will be no adverse affect on the TSC.

    —  Implementation relates to any and all interfaces between ITSO and Oyster on PRESTIGE.

  The following key requirements in addition to the above from the Variation Notice were derived. The system must:

    —  deliver a passenger experience similar to that of Oyster, where possible;

    —  be fully ITSO certified;

    —  support all ITSO card types and relevant product types;

    —  provide ITSO card read / validation performance of less than 750 milliseconds;

    —  operationally support ITSO Hotlists and Action Lists;

    —  fully implement TfL's existing magnetic ticket business rules applied to ITSO cards; and

    —  provide support for revenue control activities, including passback protection.

  IOP will provide an ITSO Operating service in that it will accept ITSO products presented on a smartcard, without providing product retailing functionality to TfL.

IMPLEMENTATION SOLUTION

  The End Stage Two Report included various options to meet the requirements. Option 2 was selected for the Stage Three activities. This option is full replacement of the PRESTIGE readers and the functional capability to support ITSO Hot Lists and Action Lists as well as facilitating staff Customer Service assistance and providing Passengers access to information on their ITSO cards.

  The following technical solutions will be required to implement ITSO on PRESTIGE:

    —  Provision of TfL ITSO back office (purchase and integration) and associated ITSO infrastructure enhancements.

    —  Upgrade the card readers (hardware and software) to provide the required card performance and to include the ITSO Security Access Module (ISAM).

    —  Upgrade Ticket Office Machines (software) to read and display ITSO card contents to enable ticket office personnel to determine whether or not passengers have the correct products with which to travel in "Oysterland".

    —  Upgrade Patron Operated Machines (software) to read and display ITSO card contents to enable passengers to determine whether they have the correct products on their ITSO cards with which to travel in "Oysterland".

    —  Provide the functionality (hardware and software) for ITSO data to be retrieved from the memory of a failed card reader to ensure no transaction data is lost.

November 2007






26   The results of the requirements analyses are presented in the ITSO on PRESTIGE Project-Design Study: End Stage Two Report. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 1 April 2008