Select Committee on Welsh Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the National Deaf Childrens' Society

ADDITIONAL LEARNING NEEDS PROPOSED LCO

  NDCS is the national charity dedicated to creating a world without barriers for deaf children and young people. We represent the interests and campaign for the rights of all deaf children and young people from birth until they lead independent lives. Our vision is a world without barriers for every deaf child.

  Our starting point with this submission is that governments and legislatures should have the willingness and power to create a better world for deaf children. Given that Wales has some devolved functions in this area, it would be better for them to have all the powers to make a real change in this area, determined by need and the best interests of deaf children and their families, than have the scope and nature of the reform driven by legislative competence restrictions.

  We therefore support in principle this LCO with one caveat; that the definition of disability is a narrow one, explicitly only covering those with physical or mental disabilities. We believe that this definition should be expanded to cover those with a sensory impairment as well. This would remove any doubt as to the extent of the Order, and remove anomalies at Measure stage resultant solely from the scope of the LCO.

  With that pre-amble, our answers to the questions in your consultation:

1.   To what extent might the transfer of functions proposed have wider implications for the UK budget?

  The LCO is not a transfer of functions, which can have budgetary implications, but a transfer of legislative competence which, given the method of funding the devolved legislatures, won't have any immediate effect on the UK budget.

2.   To what extent might the transfer of functions impact on reserved functions; for example, would the transfer of functions increase regulatory burdens on business?

  We can't see any way in which this LCO would impact on any reserved functions. It only touches on Education issues, 100% devolved already.

3.   Are there any cross-border issues relating to the LCO? (Would legislation subsequently be required in England?)

  This LCO would simply be enhancing the powers of the Assembly in areas it already has competency. The only way in which it would have legislative effects for England would be if the Westminster Government subsequently decided, having seen the decisions taken by the Assembly, that some ideas were worth incorporating into legislation for England. But that would be a policy decision for the Westminster structures and not in any way dependent on this LCO.

4.   Would the proposed LCO necessitate the formation or abolition of Walsh institutions and structures? If so, where does the legislative competence to exercise such changes lie?

  None. Excepting some schools which specialise in delivery of ALN services, and of which the Assembly Government and relevant LEA already have responsibility, there are no public institutions in Wales which specialise in this area (aside from the NHS and no specialist trusts there) and which could therefore be affected.

5.   Is the LCO request in the spirit and scope of the devolution settlement?

  Yes. It is clearly within the mainstream of Education, a devolved area.

6.   Is the use of the LCO mechanism in accordance with the Government of Wales Act 2006?

  Yes.

7.   Is the use of an LCO more appropriate than, for example, the use of framework powers in a Westminster Bill?

  We are agnostic as to whether the legislative competence reaches the Assembly via a LCO or via framework powers. There being no appropriate item of legislation at the moment at Westminster, this LCO is an entirely suitable vehicle.

8.   The extent to which there is a demand for legislation on the matter(s) in question?

  There is widespread public policy interest in Wales on the issues covered by this LCO, including the biggest examination of any subject by an Assembly committee, that on SEN in the previous Assembly. Although we are cautious about the policy direction signalled by the Assembly Government in SEN thus far, that is a distinct issue as to whether the Assembly should have the competence at primary legislation level in this area, which is the subject of this LCO.

  I hope our comments on this issue are helpful and look forward to hearing your views in due course.

Susan Daniels OBE

Chief Executive

22 October 2007





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 21 December 2007