House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2008 - 09
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Consideration of Bill: 19 May 2009                     

911

 

Policing and Crime Bill, continued

 
 

64C    

Retention of samples etc (violent and sexual offences)

 

(1)    

This section applies where any sample has been taken from a person

 

under this Part where criminal proceedings were instituted against such

 

person in respect of a sexual offence or violent offence and such

 

proceedings concluded otherwise than with a conviction or with the

 

person being cautioned for a recordable offence or given a warning or

 

reprimand in accordance with the Crime and Disroder Act 1998 for a

 

recordable offence.

 

(2)    

Subject to subsections (6) and (7) below, the sample and any information

 

derived therefrom shall be destroyed no later than:

 

(a)    

3 years following the conclusion of the proceedings (“the initial

 

retention date”); or

 

(b)    

such later date as may be ordered under subsection (3).

 

(3)    

On application made by a chief officer of police within the period of 3

 

months before the initial retention date, the Crown Court, if satisfied that

 

there are reasonable grounds for doing so, may make an order amending,

 

or further amending, the date of destruction of the relevant sample and

 

any information derived therefrom.

 

(4)    

An order under subsection (3) shall not specify a date more than 2 years

 

later than the initial retention date.

 

(5)    

Any decisions of the Crown Court may be appealed to the Court of

 

Appeal within 21 days of such decision.

 

(6)    

Subsection (2) does not apply where—

 

(a)    

an application under subsection (3) above has been made but has

 

not been determined.

 

(b)    

the period within which an appeal may be brought under

 

subsection (5) above against a decision to refuse an application

 

has not elapsed; or

 

(c)    

such an appeal has been brought but has not been withdrawn or

 

finally determined.

 

(7)    

Where—

 

(a)    

the period within which an appeal referred to in subsection (5)

 

has elapsed without such an appeal being brought; or

 

(b)    

such an appeal is brought and is withdrawn or finally determined

 

without any extension of the time period referred to in subsection

 

(2),

 

    

the sample and any information derived therefrom shall be destroyed as

 

soon as possible thereafter.

 

(8)    

For the purposes of this Part a “sexual offence” or “violent offence” shall

 

mean such offences of a violent or sexual nature as shall be set out in any

 

order made by the Secretary of State with reference to this section.

 

64D    

Retention of Samples - Residual Power

 

(1)    

On application by a chief officer of police, the Crown Court may make

 

an order requiring the retention of a sample taken from a person and any

 

information derived therefrom in circumstances where such a sample and

 

any information derived therefrom would otherwise be required to be

 

destroyed if it has reasonable grounds to believe that:


 
 

Consideration of Bill: 19 May 2009                     

912

 

Policing and Crime Bill, continued

 
 

(a)    

there is a serious risk of harm to the public or a section of the

 

public; and

 

(b)    

such retention would prevent, inhibit, restrict or disrupt

 

involvement by the person in the commission of a sexual offence

 

or violent offence.

 

(2)    

An order under this section is not to be in force for more than 5 years

 

beginning with the date of the commencement of the order.

 

(3)    

Any decision of the Crown Court may be appealed to the Court of Appeal

 

within 21 days of such decision.

 

(4)    

Where an application has been made for an order under this section, the

 

relevant sample and any information derived therefrom shall not be

 

destroyed until such application and any appeal thereof has been

 

determined.

 

(3)    

At end of section 113(1) insert—

 

    

“provided always that the protections in Part 5 relating to the retention of samples

 

and any information derived therefrom shall also be applied to persons

 

investigated or under arrest under such Acts.”.’.

 


 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Chris Grayling

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

James Brokenshire

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Total signatories: 13

 

Andrew Rosindell

 

Mr Patrick McLoughlin

 

Chris Huhne

 

Paul Holmes

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Jenny Willott

 

David Howarth

 

28

 

Page  116,  line  16,  leave out Clause 95.

 


 

Secretary Jacqui Smith

 

112

 

Page  117,  line  29  [Clause  95],  at end insert—

 

‘(4)    

Before laying such a draft before Parliament, the Secretary of State must

 

consult—

 

(a)    

the Association of Police Authorities,

 

(b)    

the Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and

 

Northern Ireland,

 

(c)    

the General Council of the Bar,

 

(d)    

the Law Society of England and Wales,

 

(e)    

the Institute of Legal Executives, and

 

(f)    

such other persons as the Secretary of State thinks fit.’.


 
 

Consideration of Bill: 19 May 2009                     

913

 

Policing and Crime Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Chris Grayling

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

James Brokenshire

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Total signatories: 13

 

Andrew Rosindell

 

Mr Patrick McLoughlin

 

Chris Huhne

 

Paul Holmes

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Jenny Willott

 

David Howarth

 

29

 

Page  117,  line  32,  leave out Clause 96.

 


 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Chris Grayling

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

James Brokenshire

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Total signatories: 13

 

Andrew Rosindell

 

Mr Patrick McLoughlin

 

Chris Huhne

 

Paul Holmes

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Jenny Willott

 

David Howarth

 

30

 

Page  118,  line  3,  leave out Clause 97.

 


 

Secretary Jacqui Smith

 

113

 

Page  119,  line  5  [Clause  97],  at end insert—

 

‘(10A)    

Before making regulations under this Article, the Secretary of State must

 

publish a draft of the regulations and consider any representations made

 

to the Secretary of State about them.’.

 



 
 

Consideration of Bill: 19 May 2009                     

914

 

Policing and Crime Bill, continued

 
 

New Clauses and Amendments relating to Part 4

 

Interim injunctions: duration

 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Mr Virendra Sharma

 

NC20

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

An interim injunction granted under sections 38 or 39 must include the period for

 

which it shall have effect.

 

(2)    

The period specified in subsection (1) above must not exceed four weeks.

 

(3)    

Interim injunctions granted under sections 38 or 39 may not be renewed.’.

 


 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Mr Virendra Sharma

 

37

 

Page  26,  line  5  [Clause  32],  leave out ‘two’ and insert ‘four’.

 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Mr Virendra Sharma

 

40

 

Page  26,  line  6  [Clause  32],  leave out ‘on the balance of probabilities’ and insert

 

‘beyond reasonable doubt’.

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

200

 

Page  26,  line  6  [Clause  32],  leave out ‘on the balance of probabilities’ and insert

 

‘to the criminal standard of proof’.

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

201

 

Page  26,  line  13  [Clause  32],  leave out paragraph (b).

 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Mr Virendra Sharma

 

38

 

Page  26,  line  13  [Clause  32],  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

The third condition is that the applicant has demonstrated that prosecution of the

 

respondent for a criminal offence was considered but not proceeded with.’.


 
 

Consideration of Bill: 19 May 2009                     

915

 

Policing and Crime Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Mr Virendra Sharma

 

39

 

Page  26,  line  13  [Clause  32],  at end insert—

 

‘(3B)    

The fourth condition is that the respondent is aged 18 or over.’.

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

202

 

Page  26,  line  17  [Clause  32],  leave out paragraph (b).

 

Secretary Jacqui Smith

 

60

 

Page  26,  line  19  [Clause  32],  leave out from first ‘of’ to end of line 20 and insert ‘,

 

or is otherwise related to, the activities of a group that—

 

(a)    

consists of at least 3 people,

 

(b)    

uses a name, emblem or colour or has any other characteristic that

 

enables its members to be identified by others as a group, and

 

(c)    

is associated with a particular area.’.

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

203

 

Page  26,  line  19  [Clause  32],  after ‘a’, insert ‘criminal’.

 

Chris Grayling

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

James Brokenshire

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Andrew Rosindell

 

Mr Patrick McLoughlin

 

149

 

Page  26,  line  20  [Clause  32],  at end add—

 

‘(6)    

In this section “gang” means a group of people who see themselves or are seen by

 

others as a discernable group and exhibit any one or more of the following

 

factors—

 

(a)    

engaging in criminal activity;

 

(b)    

identifying with a particular geographical area;

 

(c)    

having some form of identifying organisational feature;

 

(d)    

being in conflict with other similar gangs.’.

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

204

 

Page  26,  line  32  [Clause  33],  leave out subsections (3) and (4).

 



 
 

Consideration of Bill: 19 May 2009                     

916

 

Policing and Crime Bill, continued

 
 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

205

 

Page  27,  line  4  [Clause  33],  leave out ‘and requirements’.

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

206

 

Page  27,  line  9  [Clause  33],  leave out ‘or (3)’.

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

207

 

Page  27,  line  13  [Clause  34],  leave out ‘or requirement’.

 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Mr Virendra Sharma

 

43

 

Page  27,  line  14  [Clause  34],  leave out from ‘injunction,’ to end of line 16 and

 

insert ‘the period for which it shall be in force.’.

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

208

 

Page  27,  line  16  [Clause  34],  at end insert ‘except that no injunction shall remain in

 

force for a period longer than two years from the date it is made.’.

 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Mr Virendra Sharma

 

42

 

Page  27,  line  16  [Clause  34],  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

The period specified in subsection (2) above must not exceed three years.

 

(2B)    

Injunctions granted under section 32 may not be renewed.’.

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

209

 

Page  27,  line  23  [Clause  34],  leave out paragraph (b).

 

Paul Holmes

 

Chris Huhne

 

210

 

Page  27,  line  26  [Clause  34],  leave out ‘or requirement’.

 


 

Secretary Jacqui Smith

 

61

 

Page  28,  line  4  [Clause  36],  leave out subsections (2) to (4) and insert—

 

‘( )    

The consultation requirement is that the applicant must consult—


 
 

Consideration of Bill: 19 May 2009                     

917

 

Policing and Crime Bill, continued

 
 

(a)    

any local authority, and any chief officer of police, that the applicant

 

thinks it appropriate to consult, and

 

(b)    

any other body or individual that the applicant thinks it appropriate to

 

consult.’.

 

Chris Grayling

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

James Brokenshire

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Andrew Rosindell

 

Mr Patrick McLoughlin

 

150

 

Page  28,  line  10  [Clause  36],  at end insert—

 

‘(c)    

any primary care trust, mental health trust or other NHS authority that the

 

applicant chief officer considers would be appropriate to consult; and

 

(d)    

any youth offending team, local probation service or office of the

 

National Offender Management Service that the applicant chief officer

 

considers would be appropriate to consult.’.

 

Chris Grayling

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

James Brokenshire

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Andrew Rosindell

 

Mr Patrick McLoughlin

 

151

 

Page  28,  line  16  [Clause  36],  at end insert—

 

‘(c)    

any primary care trust, mental health trust or other NHS authority that the

 

constable considers would be appropriate to consult; and

 

(d)    

any youth offending team, local probation service or office of the

 

National Offender Management Service that the constable considers

 

would be appropriate to consult.’.

 

Chris Grayling

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

James Brokenshire

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Andrew Rosindell

 

Mr Patrick McLoughlin

 

152

 

Page  28,  line  22  [Clause  36],  at end insert—

 

‘(c)    

any primary care trust, mental health trust or other NHS authority that the

 

applicant local authority considers would be appropriate to consult; and

 

(d)    

any youth offending team, local probation service or office of the

 

National Offender Management Service that the applicant local authority

 

considers would be appropriate to consult.’.

 



 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Revised 19 May 2009