House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2008 - 09
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 18 June 2009                     

198

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

Lynne Featherstone

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

164

 

Clause  34,  page  25,  line  27,  leave out subsection (8).

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment removes the powers of Government to remove specific types of premises from the

 

application of this protection.

 


 

The Solicitor General

 

61

 

Schedule  4,  page  166,  line  14,  leave out ‘5(4)(b)’ and insert ‘5(4)(c)’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment would correct a minor drafting error.

 


 

Lynne Featherstone

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

165

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  22,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

An employer (A) discriminates against a person (B) in the arrangements in

 

subsection (1)(a) if A fails to take reasonable steps to ensure that—

 

(a)    

the selection for interview is carried out on an anonymous basis, or

 

(b)    

the person selecting for interview does not know the gender, race, sexual

 

orientation, age or marital status of B or whether B has a disability.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment protects job applicants from subliminal discrimination arising from information

 

assumed from an applicant’s name. It also prevents information being made available to people

 

short-listing that reveals whether an applicant has protected characteristic.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

207

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  22,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

An employer must not ask for details of an applicant’s health or disabilities before

 

an offer of employment to which subsection (1) applies has been made except in

 

so far as necessary to make reasonable adjustments to the recruitment process.’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

208

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  34,  at end insert—


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 18 June 2009                     

199

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

‘(3A)    

An employer must not ask for details of an applicant’s health or disabilities before

 

an offer to which subsection (3) applies has been made except in so far as

 

necessary to make reasonable adjustments to the selection process.’.

 


 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

213

 

Clause  38,  page  28,  line  2,  after ‘worker’, insert ‘with a protected characteristic

 

compared to a contract worker without a protected characteristic’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

214

 

Clause  38,  page  28,  line  10,  after ‘worker’, insert ‘with a protected characteristic

 

compared to a contract worker without a protected characteristic’.

 


 

John Mason

 

41

 

Schedule  6,  page  169,  line  15,  leave out paragraphs 2 and 3.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Political appointments, honours and peerages are exempt from the ban on discriminating against

 

office-holders. this amendment would remove those exemptions.

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

199

 

Schedule  6,  page  170,  line  9,  at end insert ‘or other authorities of the GLA family’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

An amendment to clarify that elected members of GLA authorities (MPA, LFEPA etc.) are to be

 

treated in the same way as members of the GLA.

 


 

The Solicitor General

 

62

 

Clause  51,  page  40,  line  14,  after second ‘a’, insert ‘relevant’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment and amendment 63 would correct a minor drafting error to clarify that the

 

interpretation of a reference to conferring a relevant qualification applies in relation to all

 

relevant qualifications. A reference to conferring a relevant qualification would then include a

 

reference to renewing or extending its conferment.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 18 June 2009                     

200

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

The Solicitor General

 

63

 

Clause  51,  page  40,  line  15,  after ‘a’, insert ‘relevant’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See the explanatory statement for amendment 62.

 


 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

209

 

Clause  52,  page  40,  line  27,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

An employment service-provider must not ask for details of an applicant’s health

 

or disabilities before an offer to which subsection (1) applies has been made

 

except in so far as necessary to make reasonable adjustments to the selection

 

process.’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

210

 

Clause  52,  page  41,  line  5,  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

An employment service-provider must not ask for details of an applicant’s health

 

or disabilities before an offer to which subsection (4) applies has been made

 

except in so far as necessary to make reasonable adjustments to the selection

 

process.’.

 

The Solicitor General

 

226

 

Clause  52,  page  41,  line  12,  leave out from ‘service-provider’ to end of line 14 and

 

insert ‘, except in relation to the provision of a vocational service.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment and amendments 227 to 229 would maintain the effect of the existing law by

 

providing for persons who provide certain employment services to be subject to the anticipatory

 

duty to make reasonable adjustments that is imposed by Part 3 in relation to services generally.

 

The Solicitor General

 

227

 

Clause  52,  page  41,  line  14,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

The duty imposed by section 27(7)(a) applies to a person concerned with the

 

provision of a vocational service; but a failure to comply with that duty in relation

 

to the provision of a vocational service is a contravention of this Part for the

 

purposes of Part 9 (enforcement).’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement for amendment 226.

 


 

The Solicitor General

 

64

 

Clause  53,  page  41,  line  37,  leave out subsection (3).


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 18 June 2009                     

201

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment would omit Clause 53(3) which excludes from the scope of Clause 52 services the

 

provision of which is otherwise than by way of a trade or profession, reinstating the effect of

 

existing law, whereby the manner in which employment services are provided is irrelevant.

 

The Solicitor General

 

228

 

Clause  53,  page  42,  line  4,  leave out subsection (7).

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement for amendment 226.

 

The Solicitor General

 

229

 

Clause  53,  page  42,  line  12,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

A reference to the provision of a vocational service is a reference to the provision

 

of an employment service within subsection (2)(a) to (d) (or an employment

 

service within subsection (2)(f) or (g) in so far as it is also an employment service

 

within subsection (2)(a) to (d)); and for that purpose—

 

(a)    

the references to an employment service within subsection (2)(a) do not

 

include a reference to vocational training within the meaning given by

 

subsection (8)(b), and

 

(b)    

the references to an employment service within subsection (2)(d) also

 

include a reference to a service for assisting persons to retain

 

employment.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement for amendment 226.

 


 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

211

 

Clause  54,  page  42,  line  20,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

A trade organisation must not ask for details of an applicant’s health or

 

disabilities before an offer of membership to which subsection (1) applies has

 

been made except in so far as necessary to make reasonable adjustments to the

 

selection process.’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

212

 

Clause  54,  page  42,  line  34,  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

A trade organisation must not ask for details of an applicant’s health or

 

disabilities before an offer of membership to which subsection (4) applies has

 

been made except in so far as necessary to make reasonable adjustments to the

 

selection process.’.

 



 
 

Public Bill Committee: 18 June 2009                     

202

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

The Solicitor General

 

65

 

Clause  58,  page  45,  line  19,  leave out from ‘person’ to ‘scheme’ in line 20 and

 

insert ‘who is a pension credit member of an occupational pension scheme as they apply

 

in relation to a disabled person who is a deferred member or pensioner member of the’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

A non-discrimination rule does not apply in relation to pension credit members of an occupational

 

pension scheme. This amendment and amendments 66 and 89 would ensure that disabled pension

 

credit members are protected from discrimination in so far as communications in relation to the

 

scheme are concerned.

 

The Solicitor General

 

66

 

Clause  58,  page  45,  line  26,  leave out subsection (2).

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement for amendment 65.

 


 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

239

 

Clause  64,  page  49,  line  23,  at end add ‘Any difference on the grounds of sex or age

 

in the provision of goods or services shall not be discriminatory if the difference is

 

because of a material factor which is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate

 

aim.’.

 


 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

28

 

Clause  73,  page  55,  line  14,  leave out ‘by regulations’ and insert ‘not’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

15

 

Clause  73,  page  55,  line  17,  at end insert ‘and

 

(b)    

employees who have a disability and employees who do not have a

 

disability.’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

14

 

Clause  73,  page  55,  line  19,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

the Armed Forces;

 

( )    

the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service or the Government

 

Communications Headquarters;’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 18 June 2009                     

203

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

13

 

Clause  73,  page  55,  line  20,  leave out paragraph (b).

 

The Solicitor General

 

67

 

Clause  73,  page  55,  line  20,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

a government department or part of the armed forces not specified in that

 

Schedule.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment would exclude the security and intelligence agencies and GCHQ’s military

 

helpers from the scope of Clause 73. As a result, that clause would not apply to any government

 

department or any part of the armed forces.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

12

 

Page  55,  line  13,  leave out Clause 73.

 


 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

240

 

Clause  77,  page  58,  line  4,  leave out ‘with or’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

241

 

Clause  77,  page  58,  line  6,  leave out ‘with or’.

 


 

John Mason

 

44

 

Schedule  9,  page  181,  line  33,  leave out ‘proportionate’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The addition of a new proportionality test narrows the scope of existing exceptions for religious

 

employment. This amendment, in conjunction with the amendment to leave out sub-paragraph (8),

 

retains the status quo.

 

The Solicitor General

 

68

 

Schedule  9,  page  181,  line  36,  leave out ‘work’ and insert ‘employment’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment would ensure that paragraph 2 of Schedule 9 refers consistently to

 

“employment”.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 18 June 2009                     

204

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

John Mason

 

45

 

Schedule  9,  page  181,  line  37,  leave out ‘proportionate’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The addition of a new proportionality test narrows the scope of existing exceptions for religious

 

employment. This amendment, in conjunction with the Amendment to leave out sub-paragraph (8),

 

retains the status quo.

 

John Mason

 

42

 

Schedule  9,  page  181,  line  41,  leave out sub-paragraph (8) and insert—

 

‘(8)    

Employment is for the purposes of an organised religion if—

 

(a)    

A has an ethos based on religion or belief, or

 

(b)    

the employment wholly or mainly involves—

 

(i)    

leading or assisting in the observation of liturgical or ritualistic

 

practices of the religion, or

 

(ii)    

promoting or explaining the doctrine of the religion (whether to

 

followers of the religion or to others).’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Sub-paragraph (8) narrows the scope of existing exceptions for religious employment. This

 

amendment would instead broaden the scope of the exceptions to benefit all religious

 

organisations.

 

John Mason

 

43

 

Schedule  9,  page  181,  line  41,  leave out sub-paragraph (8).

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Sub-paragraph (8) narrows the scope of existing exceptions for religious employment. This

 

amendment, in conjunction with the amendments to lines 33 and 37, retains the status quo.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

189

 

Schedule  9,  page  181,  line  42,  leave out ‘wholly or’.

 

John Mason

 

46

 

Schedule  9,  page  182,  line  6,  leave out from ‘requirement’ to ‘if’ and insert ‘to

 

which sub-paragraph (2) applies’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Place the exceptions from paragraph 2 of Schedule 9 into paragraph 3, which has a broader

 

framework. This would provide wider protection for the freedom of association of religious bodies.

 

John Mason

 

47

 

Schedule  9,  page  182,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

    ‘(2)  

This sub-paragraph applies to—

 

(a)    

a requirement to be of a particular religion or belief;

 

(b)    

a requirement to be of a particular sex;

 

(c)    

a requirement not to be a transsexual person;

 

(d)    

a requirement not be married or a civil partner;


 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Revised 18 June 2009