House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2008 - 09
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

315

 

House of Commons

 
 

Tuesday 30 June 2009

 

Public Bill Committee

 

New Amendments handed in are marked thus Parliamentary Star

 

Parliamentary Star - whiteAmendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance

 

Equality Bill


 

Note

 

The Amendments have been arranged according to the Order of the Committee

 

[2 June 2009].

 


 

Mr Tim Boswell

 

242

 

Clause  143,  page  105,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

‘(d)    

respect and protect the human rights of any person for whom it has

 

responsibility, whether or not they have a relevant protected

 

characteristic.’.

 

As an Amendment to Mr Tim Boswell’s proposed Amendment (No. 242):—

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

(a)

 

At beginning insert ‘fulfil’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Amendment to take the usual formation of human rights legislation.

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

249

 

Clause  143,  page  105,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

‘(2)    

Subsection (1)(b) does not apply in so far as it relates to religion or belief.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment removes the duty on public authorities to have regard to promoting equality of

 

opportunity between religious people.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 30 June 2009                     

316

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

19

 

Clause  143,  page  105,  line  14,  at beginning insert ‘Subsection (1) will also apply

 

to’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

20

 

Clause  143,  page  105,  leave out lines 15 and 16 and insert ‘except in relation to matters

 

of employment’.

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

307

 

Parliamentary Star - white    

Clause  143,  page  105,  line  27,  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

In meeting the needs of persons who share a relevant protected characteristic that

 

are different from the needs of persons who do not share it, a person complying

 

with its duties under this section shall prefer the inclusive provision of services

 

over separate provision of services.’.

 

Mr David Drew

 

279

 

Clause  143,  page  105,  line  31,  leave out ‘and’.

 

Mr David Drew

 

280

 

Clause  143,  page  105,  line  32,  at end insert ‘and,

 

(c)    

eliminate hatred and hostility towards members of different groups.’.

 

John Mason

 

49

 

Clause  143,  page  105,  line  32,  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

Having due regard to the need to foster good relations between persons who share

 

a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it involves

 

ensuring a proper balance between the rights of persons who share a relevant

 

protected characteristic and the rights of persons who share a different relevant

 

protected characteristic.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Prevents public authorities using the public sector equality duty to favour the rights of one group

 

over another.

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

297

 

Clause  143,  page  105,  line  32,  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

In complying with its duties under this section, a public authority shall not inhibit

 

lawful free expression.’.

 

This underpins the need to preserve lawful freedom of expression in public life.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 30 June 2009                     

317

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

21

 

Clause  143,  page  105,  line  35,  at end insert—

 

‘(5A)    

A public authority must collect and publish data annually showing, in the exercise

 

of its functions, the extent to which it has succeeded in meeting the requirements

 

under subsection (1).’.

 

As an Amendment to Mr Mark Harper’s proposed Amendment (No. 21):—

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

(a)

 

Line  2,  leave out from ‘meeting’ to end and insert—

 

‘(a)    

eliminating discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other

 

conduct that is prohibited by or under this Act;

 

(b)    

advancing equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant

 

protected characteristic and persons who do not share it;

 

(c)    

fostering good relations between persons who share a relevant protected

 

characteristic and persons who do not share it.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Public authorities must publish data on whether they have achieved the three parts of the equality

 

duty, rather than on whether they have had regard to this requirement.

 


 

Lynne Featherstone

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

281

 

Schedule  18,  page  215,  line  25,  leave out paragraph 1.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

To remove the exception from the age public sector equality duty so far as relating to education

 

and public services for young people, such as children’s homes.

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

298

 

Schedule  18,  page  215,  line  41,  leave out ‘, race or religion or belief’ and insert ‘,

 

nationality’.

 

The Solicitor General

 

282

 

Schedule  18,  page  216,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

‘Judicial functions, etc.

 

      (1)  

Section 143 does not apply to the exercise of—

 

(a)    

a judicial function;

 

(b)    

a function exercised on behalf of, or on the instructions of, a person

 

exercising a judicial function.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 30 June 2009                     

318

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

      (2)  

The references to a judicial function include a reference to a judicial function

 

conferred on a person other than a court or tribunal.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment would provide that the duties imposed by clause 143 on public authorities, as well

 

as on other persons exercising public functions, will not apply to the exercise of judicial functions

 

(or other functions exercised in a judicial context).

 

John Mason

 

50

 

Schedule  18,  page  216,  leave out lines 21 to 24.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The Commons, the Lords, the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly are exempt from the

 

public sector equality duty. This amendment would remove those exemptions.

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

300

 

Schedule  18,  page  216,  leave out line 25.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment removes the exemption for the General Synod of the Church of England from the

 

duty in section 143(2).

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

192

 

Schedule  18,  page  216,  line  31,  at end insert—

 

‘(j)    

persons involved in the commissioning, content and broadcast of

 

programmes.’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

278

 

Schedule  18,  page  216,  line  34,  at end insert—

 

‘(aa)    

a function in connection with membership of the House of Commons;’.

 

The Solicitor General

 

283

 

Schedule  18,  page  216,  line  40,  leave out paragraphs (d) and (e).

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment is consequential on amendment 282.

 

The Solicitor General

 

284

 

Schedule  18,  page  216,  line  43,  leave out paragraph (f).

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment would remove from the exceptions to the duty imposed by clause 143 on persons

 

other than public authorities who exercise public functions, an exception for decisions to

 

prosecute; accordingly, the duties imposed by clause 143 on public authorities, and others

 

exercising public functions, will apply to such decisions.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 30 June 2009                     

319

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

193

 

Schedule  18,  page  216,  line  44,  at end insert—

 

‘(g)    

a function in connection with the commissioning, content and broadcast

 

of programmes.’.

 

The Solicitor General

 

285

 

Schedule  18,  page  216,  line  45,  leave out sub-paragraph (4).

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment is consequential on amendment 282.

 


 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

266

 

Schedule  19,  page  218,  line  43,  at end insert—

 

‘The relevant qualifications regulator (The Office of the Qualifications and

 

Examinations Regulator—Ofqual).’.

 


 

John Mason

 

51

 

Page  107,  line  6,  leave out Clause 145.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Removes all ministerial order-making powers related to the public sector equality duty. This would

 

require the Government to use primary legislation instead.

 


 

John Mason

 

52

 

Page  107,  line  29,  leave out Clause 146.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Removes all ministerial order-making powers related to the public sector equality duty. This would

 

require the Government to use primary legislation instead.

 



 
 

Public Bill Committee: 30 June 2009                     

320

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

22

 

Clause  147,  page  108,  line  27,  at end insert—

 

‘(5)    

Before regulations are made under this section, there must be laid before both

 

Houses of Parliament—

 

(a)    

draft regulations, and

 

(b)    

evidence that the regulations will enable the better performance by public

 

authorities of the duty imposed by subsection (1).’.

 

John Mason

 

53

 

Page  108,  line  18,  leave out Clause 147.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Removes all ministerial order-making powers related to the public sector equality duty. This would

 

require the Government to use primary legislation instead.

 


 

John Mason

 

54

 

Page  109,  line  1,  leave out Clause 148.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Removes all ministerial order-making powers related to the public sector equality duty. This would

 

require the Government to use primary legislation instead.

 


 

John Mason

 

55

 

Page  110,  line  17,  leave out Clause 149.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Removes all ministerial order-making powers related to the public sector equality duty. This would

 

require the Government to use primary legislation instead.

 


 

The Solicitor General

 

84

 

Clause  151,  page  111,  line  8,  after ‘person’, insert ‘other than the Assembly

 

Commission’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment would provide for the National Assembly for Wales Commission not to be a

 

“relevant Welsh authority”; accordingly, a Minister of the Crown (not the Welsh Ministers) would

 

have power to make an order to add the Commission to Schedule 19 or to impose specific duties

 

on it.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 30 June 2009                     

321

 

Equality Bill, continued

 
 

The Solicitor General

 

85

 

Clause  151,  page  111,  line  12,  after ‘authority’, insert ‘or the Assembly

 

Commission’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment would provide for the National Assembly for Wales Commission not to be a

 

“relevant cross-border authority”; accordingly, a Minister of the Crown (not the Welsh Ministers)

 

would have power to make an order to add the Commission to Schedule 19 or to impose specific

 

duties on it.

 

The Solicitor General

 

86

 

Clause  151,  page  111,  line  14,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

The Assembly Commission has the same meaning as in the Government of Wales

 

Act 2006.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment would define “the Assembly Commission” in amendments 84 and 85 as the

 

National Assembly for Wales Commission or Comisiwn Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru.

 


 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

303

 

Clause  152,  page  112,  line  19,  after ‘needs’, insert ‘to the extent that it is

 

reasonable to meet them’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

To ensure that bodies do not undertake unreasonable measures positive action to accommodate

 

unreasonable needs.

 


 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

29

 

Clause  153,  page  113,  line  2,  leave out ‘reasonably thinks’ and insert ‘can

 

demonstrate’.

 

Mr Mark Harper

 

John Penrose

 

Mr John Baron

 

23

 

Clause  153,  page  113,  line  16,  leave out ‘as qualified as’ and insert ‘equally

 

qualified to’.

 

Dr Evan Harris

 

Lynne Featherstone

 

301

 

Clause  153,  page  113,  line  17,  leave out paragraph (b).


 
contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Revised 30 June 2009