House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2008 - 09
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Equality Bill


 

Equality Bill
Part 5 — Work
Chapter 3 — Equality of terms

 
 

Insurance Group, which established that occupational pensions were equal pay for the

purposes of Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome. Where the application of the rule relates to the

terms on which a person becomes a member of the scheme, it has effect from 8 April 1976.

This was the date of the judgment in Defrenne v Sabena, where the Court, in holding that the

principle of equal pay was directly effective, indicated that Article 141 (formerly Article 119)

5

of the Treaty of Rome should not be applied to periods of service prior to the judgment.

219. Where there has been a breach of a term modified by a sex equality rule, proceedings

may be brought against the person responsible for the breach under Part 9 of the Bill.

Background

220. The clause replaces equivalent equal treatment provisions in section 62 of the

10

Pensions Act 1995.

Example

• A scheme rule requires employees to work full time before they may join the scheme.

There may be a breach of the equality rule because the scheme rule may have an

adverse impact on female employees, who are less able to comply with the

15

requirement to work full-time.

Clause 63: Sex equality rule: consequential alteration of schemes

Effect

221. This clause gives trustees and managers of an occupational pension scheme the power,

by resolution, to alter scheme rules to conform to the sex equality rule in clause 62.

20

222. They may use the power if:

• they lack the power to alter rules; or

• procedures for altering rules, including obtaining consent from another person (for

example the employer), are unduly complex or would take too long.

223. In line with clause 62, where the operation of an equality rule relates to the terms on

25

which a person becomes a member of the scheme, any alteration made relying on this section

may only have effect from 8 April 1976. Where the alteration relates to a term on which a

member of the scheme is treated, reliance on this section may have effect only from 17 May

1990.

E48


 

Equality Bill
Part 5 — Work
Chapter 3 — Equality of terms

 
 

(a)   

a term on which persons become members of the scheme, or

(b)   

a term on which members of the scheme are treated.

(4)   

A discretion is relevant if its exercise in relation to the scheme is capable of

affecting—

(a)   

the way in which persons become members of the scheme, or

5

(b)   

the way in which members of the scheme are treated.

(5)   

The reference in subsection (3)(b) to a term on which members of a scheme are

treated includes a reference to the term as it has effect for the benefit of

dependants of members.

(6)   

The reference in subsection (4)(b) to the way in which members of a scheme are

10

treated includes a reference to the way in which they are treated as the scheme

has effect for the benefit of dependants of members.

(7)   

If the effect of a relevant matter on persons of the same sex differs according to

their family, marital or civil partnership status, a comparison for the purposes

of this section of the effect of that matter on persons of the opposite sex must

15

be with persons who have the same status.

(8)   

A relevant matter is—

(a)   

a relevant term;

(b)   

a term conferring a relevant discretion;

(c)   

the exercise of a relevant discretion in relation to an occupational

20

pension scheme.

(9)   

This section, so far as relating to the terms on which persons become members

of an occupational pension scheme, does not have effect in relation to

pensionable service before 8 April 1976.

(10)   

This section, so far as relating to the terms on which members of an

25

occupational pension scheme are treated, does not have effect in relation to

pensionable service before 17 May 1990.

63      

Sex equality rule: consequential alteration of schemes

(1)   

This section applies if the trustees or managers of an occupational pension

scheme do not have power to make sex equality alterations to the scheme.

30

(2)   

This section also applies if the trustees or managers of an occupational pension

scheme have power to make sex equality alterations to the scheme but the

procedure for doing so—

(a)   

is liable to be unduly complex or protracted, or

(b)   

involves obtaining consents which cannot be obtained or which can be

35

obtained only with undue delay or difficulty.

(3)   

The trustees or managers may by resolution make sex equality alterations to

the scheme.

(4)   

Sex equality alterations may have effect in relation to a period before the date

on which they are made.

40

(5)   

Sex equality alterations to an occupational pension scheme are such alterations

to the scheme as may be required to secure conformity with a sex equality rule.

48


 

Equality Bill
Part 5 — Work
Chapter 3 — Equality of terms

 
 

Background

224. The clause replaces equivalent equal treatment provisions in section 65 of the

Pensions Act 1995.

Example

• The scheme rules of a large scheme require consultation with all the members before

5

an amendment to the rules may be made. This is impracticable, particularly as some

deferred members cannot be traced. Scheme trustees may make the necessary

alterations to scheme rules relying on this power.

Clause 64: Defence of material factor

Effect

10

225. As a general rule, if the work of two colleagues of the opposite sex is equal but their

terms are not, the sex equality clause takes effect. This clause provides that neither a sex

equality clause nor a sex equality rule will apply if the employer can show that the difference

in terms is due to a material factor which is relevant and significant and not simply because

one is male and the other female.

15

226. If there is evidence that the factor which explains the difference in terms is indirectly

discriminatory on grounds of sex, the employer must show that it is a proportionate means of

meeting a legitimate aim or the sex equality clause will apply. For these purposes, the long-

term objective of reducing pay inequality will always count as a legitimate aim.

227. Subsection (4) deals with the application of the material factor defence to

20

occupational pension schemes.

Background

228. The Equal Pay Act 1970 and Pensions Act 1995 made similar provision permitting

employers and trustees to objectively justify differences to which an equality clause or rule

would otherwise apply. This clause draws those separate provisions into one clause and

25

clarifies the way in which they are to be applied. The reference in the former legislation to a

difference being “genuinely” due to a material factor has not been repeated in this clause since

the adverb added nothing to the meaning of the requirement, which is that the employer’s

obligation is to show that the reason for the difference is genuine and not a sham. The clause

incorporates the effect of EC law in respect of objective justification of indirectly

30

discriminatory factors.

229. The reference to an employer’s objective of reducing pay inequality between men and

women always being considered a legitimate aim is new.

230. Examples

• An employer introduces a bonus payment to encourage staff doing the same work to

35

work a new night shift to maximise production. Only a small number of female staff

can work at night and the bonus payments go almost entirely to male employees.

Despite the disparate effect on the female employees, the employer’s aim is legitimate

and the payment of a bonus to night workers is a proportionate way of achieving it.

E49


 

Equality Bill
Part 5 — Work
Chapter 3 — Equality of terms

 
 

64      

Defence of material factor

(1)   

The sex equality clause in A’s terms has no effect in relation to a difference

between A’s terms and B’s terms if the responsible person shows that the

difference is because of a material factor—

5

(a)   

which is not the difference of sex, or

(b)   

which is within subsection (2).

(2)   

A factor is within this subsection if—

(a)   

A shows that, as a result of the factor, A and persons of the same sex

doing work equal to A’s are put at a particular disadvantage when

10

compared with persons of the opposite sex doing work equal to A’s,

but

(b)   

the responsible person shows that relying on the factor is a

proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

(3)   

For the purposes of subsection (2), the long-term objective of reducing

15

inequality between men’s and women’s terms of work is always to be

regarded as a legitimate aim.

(4)   

A sex e quality rule has no effect in relation to a difference between A and B in

the effect of a relevant matter if the trustees or managers of the scheme in

question show that the difference is because of a material factor which is not

20

the difference of sex.

(5)   

“Relevant matter” has the meaning given in section 62.

(6)   

For the purposes of this section, a factor is not material unless it is a material

difference between A’s case and B’s.

49


 

Equality Bill
Part 5 — Work
Chapter 3 — Equality of terms

 
 

• A firm of accountants structures employees’ pay on the basis of success in building

relationships with clients (including at after hours client functions). Because of

domestic responsibilities, fewer women than men can maintain regular client contact

and women’s pay is much lower. The employer is unable to show the way it rewards

client relationship building is proportionate, taking into account the disadvantage to

5

women employees.

• In imposing a new pay structure which seeks to remove pay inequalities between men

and women employees, and to accommodate the interests of all the various groups, an

employer includes measures which seek to protect the pay of the higher paid group for

a short period of time. The intention to remove pay inequalities is a legitimate aim, and

10

the question will be whether the imposition of the particular temporary pay protection

arrangements is a proportionate means of achieving it.

Clause 65: Exclusion of sex discrimination provisions

Effect

230. This clause ensures that the sex discrimination provisions of the Bill do not apply

15

where an equality clause or rule operates (or would operate in the absence of a defence of

material factor or the exceptions set out in Part 2 of Schedule 7).

231. The sex discrimination provisions prohibit sex discrimination in relation to non-

contractual pay and benefits such as promotion, transfer and training and in relation to offers

of employment or appointment.

20

232. The equality of terms provisions operate only in relation to the terms of a contract of

employment, the terms of appointment to a personal or public office and the terms of service

of members of the armed forces.

Background

233. This provision brings together sex discrimination and equality of terms provisions

25

previously found in the Equal Pay Act 1970 and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and explains

how they work together.

Example

• A female sales manager is entitled under her contract to a bonus every year in

proportion to the number of sales her team achieves. She discovers that a male sales

30

manager for the same firm doing the same job has a contract which includes a larger

bonus payment in relation to the same number of sales. Her claim will be dealt with

under the equality clause provisions.

Clause 66: Sex discrimination in relation to contractual pay

Effect

35

234. This clause deals with sex discrimination in relation to contractual pay in

circumstances where a sex equality clause would not operate. This could be because there is

no colleague doing equal work with whom a claimant can compare their pay or other terms.

E50


 

Equality Bill
Part 5 — Work
Chapter 3 — Equality of terms

 
 

65      

Exclusion of sex discrimination provisions

(1)   

The relevant sex discrimination provision has no effect in relation to a term of

A’s that—

(a)   

is modified by, or included by virtue of, a sex equality clause or rule, or

5

(b)   

would be so modified or included but for section 64 or Part 2 of

Schedule 7.

(2)   

Neither of the following is sex discrimination for the purposes of the relevant

sex discrimination provision—

(a)   

the inclusion in A’s terms of a term that is less favourable as referred to

10

in section 61(2)(a);

(b)   

the failure to include in A’s terms a corresponding term as referred to

in section 61(2)(b).

(3)   

The relevant sex discrimination provision is, in relation to work of a

description given in the first column of the table, the provision referred to in

15

the second column so far as relating to sex.

 

Description of work

Provision

 
 

Employment

Section 36(2)

 
 

Appointment to a personal office

Section 46(6)

 
 

Appointment to a public office

Section 47(6)

 

20

66      

Sex discrimination in relation to contractual pay

(1)   

This section applies in relation to a term of a person’s work—

(a)   

that relates to pay, but

(b)   

in relation to which a sex equality clause or rule has no effect.

50


 

Equality Bill
Part 5 — Work
Chapter 3 — Equality of terms

 
 

The clause enables a person who is treated less favourably than others by being paid less

because of the person’s sex to pursue a claim for direct discrimination in these circumstances.

Background

235. This clause is a new provision designed to allow claims to be brought where a person

can show evidence of direct sex discrimination in relation to contractual pay but is unable to

5

gain the benefit of a sex equality clause due to the absence of a comparator doing equal work.

Example

• An employer tells a female employee “I would pay you more if you were a man”. In

the absence of any male comparator the woman cannot bring a claim for breach of an

equality clause but she can bring a claim of direct sex discrimination against the

10

employer.

Clause 67: Relevant types of work

Effect

236. This clause sets out the types of work that are covered by the provisions for pregnancy

and maternity equality set out in the clauses which follow.

15

237. Background

237. This clause replaces various provisions in the Equal Pay Act 1970, which set out who

is covered by the pregnancy and maternity equality requirements.

Clause 68: Maternity equality clause

Effect

20

238. This clause requires that a woman’s contract must be read as including a maternity

equality clause. Clause 69 sets out how a maternity equality clause modifies a woman’s pay.

No comparator is required in these cases.

239. A maternity equality clause is capable of affecting the terms of an occupational

pension scheme but only in the way a maternity equality rule (as described in clause 70 would.

25

This ensures that the provisions relating to pregnancy and maternity equality of terms at work

and the provision governing pension schemes in clause 70 operate effectively together.

Background

240. This clause reflects provisions of the Equal Pay Act 1970.

E51


 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Revised 24 April 2009